Hawley, Josh [R-MO]
Republican · MO · 36 bills sponsored
A bill to amend the Sherman Act to prohibit certain entities from purchasing residential real estate, and for other purposes.
# Bill Summary: S 3937 - Residential Real Estate Purchase Restrictions **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would amend the Sherman Act (a major antitrust law) to restrict certain types of entities from buying residential homes. While the specific entities aren't detailed in this summary, such legislation typically targets large corporations, investment firms, or institutional investors that purchase single-family homes in bulk. The goal would be to limit corporate ownership of residential properties and keep more homes available for individual buyers and owner-occupants. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact large real estate investors and corporations that purchase homes as investment properties, as well as homebuyers and renters competing for affordable housing in their local markets. Communities experiencing rising home prices and corporate-driven rental markets would be most directly affected. **Current Status** S 3937 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was sponsored by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO). At this stage, it remains in the early legislative process and would need committee approval and further action to move forward.
GRID Act
# GRID Act Summary I can see this bill (S. 3852) is sponsored by Senator Josh Hawley and is currently in committee, but the information provided doesn't include the bill's actual text or detailed provisions. Without access to the specific content, I cannot accurately summarize what the GRID Act would do, who it would affect, or what its key provisions are. To provide you with an accurate, factual summary, I would need additional information such as: - The bill's official description or summary - Its stated purpose and provisions - Which committee it's assigned to - Any available legislative summaries from Congress.gov **I'd recommend checking Congress.gov directly** (search for "S. 3852") where you can find the full bill text, official summary, and any available analysis. This ensures you get accurate, complete information about what the bill actually proposes.
Special Inspector General for Program Fraud Act
# Special Inspector General for Program Fraud Act (S 3643) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would establish a new "Special Inspector General for Program Fraud" position within the federal government. This official would be tasked with investigating and monitoring fraud, waste, and abuse across federal programs. The inspector general would have authority to oversee how federal agencies spend taxpayer money and identify instances where funds may be misused or lost to fraudulent activities. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect federal agencies and programs that receive government funding, as well as taxpayers concerned with how their money is spent. By creating a dedicated watchdog position focused specifically on fraud prevention and detection, the bill aims to strengthen oversight of federal spending. The inspector general would likely have investigative powers, reporting requirements, and the ability to make recommendations for improving program integrity across government. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO). No further action has been taken on this legislation.
National Historical Park and National Historic Landmark Establishment and Boundary Adjustments Act of 2025
# National Historical Park and National Historic Landmark Establishment and Boundary Adjustments Act of 2025 This bill would establish new national historical parks and/or national historic landmarks and adjust the boundaries of existing ones. Based on its subjects, it appears to focus on sites in New York State and involves designating or expanding protected historic areas. The legislation would affect landowners, local communities, and the National Park Service, which manages these sites. It may also involve public-private partnerships to manage or preserve these historic locations. The bill has passed the Senate and is currently awaiting consideration in the House of Representatives. Without access to the specific text, the exact historic sites involved, boundary changes, and any funding provisions cannot be detailed here. For more specific information about which sites are affected and what the practical impacts would be, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.
Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical Stock Transactions (HONEST) Act
# HONEST Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The HONEST Act aims to restrict members of Congress and their families from trading individual stocks and certain securities. If passed, it would prohibit lawmakers from buying or selling stocks while in office and would likely require them to divest (sell off) existing stock holdings. The bill also includes provisions for oversight and investigation of such trades, with potential penalties for violations. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly affects U.S. senators, representatives, and their immediate family members. Indirectly, it could impact financial markets and investment practices, as it would remove a significant group of traders from the market. **Key Provisions and Current Status:** The bill addresses concerns about "insider trading" by lawmakers—the practice of trading stocks based on non-public information gained through their government positions. It represents an effort toward greater government ethics and transparency. As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Without committee approval, it will not advance further in the legislative process.
Afghanistan Vetting and Accountability Act of 2025
# Afghanistan Vetting and Accountability Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, introduced by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO), aims to establish stricter vetting procedures and create accountability measures related to Afghanistan. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on reviewing security screening processes for Afghan refugees and individuals who came to the United States following the 2021 withdrawal, and potentially establishing oversight mechanisms to ensure proper vetting occurred. **Who It Affects** The bill would likely impact Afghan refugees and individuals who relocated to the U.S. after the Afghanistan withdrawal, as well as relevant government agencies responsible for vetting and resettlement. It could also affect future immigration and refugee processing procedures. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee (S 3310, 119th Congress), meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill has not advanced to become law. *Note: Without access to the full bill text, this summary is based on the title and sponsorship information. For complete details on specific provisions, the full legislative text would need to be reviewed.*
AI-Related Job Impacts Clarity Act
# AI-Related Job Impacts Clarity Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The AI-Related Job Impacts Clarity Act would require companies using artificial intelligence systems to report information about how AI affects their workforce. If passed, it would establish clearer rules for disclosing whether AI is replacing jobs, changing job duties, or reducing the number of workers needed. The bill aims to make companies more transparent about the employment impacts of their AI deployment. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect businesses that use AI technologies, particularly larger companies implementing significant AI systems. It would also impact workers and job seekers by providing them with better information about how AI is changing their industries and workplaces. Policymakers and researchers would also benefit from standardized data on AI's employment effects. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) in the 119th Congress but has not advanced to a floor vote. The specific reporting requirements and definitions have not yet been finalized, as the bill remains in the early legislative stage.
GUARD Act
# GUARD Act Summary Unfortunately, I cannot provide a detailed summary of the GUARD Act (S 3062) because the information available to me is limited. The bill details you've provided only show that it's currently in committee in the Senate, sponsored by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO), but don't include the actual bill text or its stated purposes. To give you accurate information about what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the full bill text or official legislative summary from Congress. I'd recommend checking Congress.gov (congress.gov), which provides complete bill information including titles, descriptions, full text, and current status for all federal legislation. If you have the bill text or a more detailed summary available, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language for you.
Support Our Farmers and Ranchers Act of 2025
# Support Our Farmers and Ranchers Act of 2025 (S 3058) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, introduced by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO), is currently under review in a Senate committee. Based on its title and sponsor, the legislation appears designed to support American farmers and ranchers, though the specific provisions are not detailed in the available information. Without access to the bill's full text, the exact measures—whether involving subsidies, tax breaks, regulatory relief, or other support mechanisms—cannot be detailed here. **Who It Affects & Current Status:** The bill would directly impact farmers and ranchers across the United States, and potentially affects agricultural markets and rural communities. Since S 3058 is still "in committee," it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. This means the proposal is in its early legislative stage and may undergo revisions before any further action occurs. No substantial details about specific provisions are currently available in public records. **Note:** For a more complete summary, the full bill text from Congress.gov would provide specific details about its intended policies and mechanisms.
Keep SNAP Funded Act of 2025
# Keep SNAP Funded Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would ensure that SNAP (food assistance benefits) continues without interruption if Congress fails to pass a regular budget or continuing resolution for the Department of Agriculture in fiscal year 2026. It would also provide retroactive payments to cover any SNAP benefits that were missed starting September 30, 2025, until the bill becomes law. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly impacts the roughly 42 million Americans who receive SNAP benefits (formerly known as food stamps). It indirectly affects USDA operations and food assistance programs that depend on continuous funding. **Current Status:** The bill (S 3024) was introduced by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee. It has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. This type of bill is typically considered emergency or contingency legislation designed to prevent lapses in food assistance during budget disputes.
Fund Farm Programs Act of 2025
# Fund Farm Programs Act of 2025 - Summary **What It Does:** This bill would provide emergency funding to keep the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Farm Service Agency (FSA) operating if Congress fails to pass a regular budget for fiscal year 2026. The FSA provides critical services to farmers, including farm loans and other financial assistance programs. If passed, the bill would ensure these services continue uninterrupted during any funding gap and would also cover any services farmers missed during the lapse period. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects American farmers who rely on FSA loans and services. It also impacts USDA employees who work at FSA offices and administer these farm programs. **Current Status:** The bill (S 3025) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) and is currently in committee. It has not yet been voted on or advanced further in the legislative process.
Prohibiting Abortion & Transgender Procedures on the Exchanges Act
# Bill Summary: Prohibiting Abortion & Transgender Procedures on the Exchanges Act **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prohibit health insurance plans sold through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces from covering abortion services and certain transgender medical procedures. Currently, some states allow marketplace plans to cover abortion care, while others restrict it. The bill would create a uniform federal rule preventing marketplace insurers from offering these specific services as part of their coverage, regardless of state law. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact people who buy health insurance through ACA exchanges—the government marketplaces where individuals can compare and purchase plans. It would also affect insurance companies offering plans in these marketplaces, as they would need to comply with the coverage restrictions. The restrictions would not affect employer-provided insurance, government programs like Medicaid or Medicare, or insurance purchased outside the marketplace. **Current Status** S 3011 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) in the 119th Congress. No action has been taken to move it forward at this time.
Artificial Intelligence Risk Evaluation Act of 2025
# Artificial Intelligence Risk Evaluation Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Artificial Intelligence Risk Evaluation Act of 2025 would establish a framework for assessing and managing risks associated with artificial intelligence systems. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to create evaluation standards that AI developers and companies would need to follow before deploying new systems to the public. The goal would be to identify potential harms—such as bias, misinformation, or security vulnerabilities—before AI systems cause problems. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily affect technology companies developing AI systems, federal agencies that oversee technology, and potentially consumers who use AI-powered products and services. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet advanced to a full vote in the Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Josh Hawley (R-Missouri). **Note:** Without access to the bill's specific text, this summary reflects the general intent suggested by the title. For detailed provisions and exact requirements, you would need to review the full legislative text available on Congress.gov.
In God We Trust Act
# In God We Trust Act (S 2736) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The "In God We Trust Act" is a bill introduced in the Senate that would require the national motto "In God We Trust" to be displayed in public schools. The bill is named after the phrase, which has been the official U.S. national motto since 1956 and appears on U.S. currency. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect public schools and school districts across the country, requiring them to post the motto in a visible location. Students, parents, educators, and school administrators would be the groups most directly impacted by any new display requirements. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) but has not advanced further in the legislative process. No action has been taken since its introduction.
AI Accountability and Personal Data Protection Act
AI Accountability and Personal Data Protection Act. This bill is currently in committee in the 119th Congress.
Protecting Our Farms and Homes from China Act
# Protecting Our Farms and Homes from China Act (S 2258) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, introduced by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO), aims to restrict Chinese ownership and investment in U.S. agricultural land and residential properties. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill's title suggests it would create barriers or prohibitions preventing Chinese individuals, companies, or government entities from purchasing farmland and homes in the United States. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect: Chinese investors and entities seeking to buy U.S. property, American landowners and farmers who might otherwise sell to Chinese buyers, and residential property markets in the United States. It could also impact U.S.-China trade relations and investment policies. **Current Status** As of now, S 2258 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill has not passed and is still in the early legislative stage. No additional details about key provisions or committee actions are available at this time. *Note: For complete information about specific restrictions and exemptions the bill proposes, you would need to review the full text of S 2258 on Congress.gov.*
STOP CSAM Act of 2025
# STOP CSAM Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary The STOP CSAM Act of 2025 is a proposed federal law designed to combat child sexual abuse material (CSAM) online. Based on its subject matter, the bill appears to address how technology companies and law enforcement handle CSAM by potentially creating new legal requirements, penalties, or procedures related to detecting, reporting, and prosecuting these crimes. The legislation would likely affect tech companies, social media platforms, internet service providers, law enforcement agencies, and potentially victims seeking legal remedies. Key areas the bill touches on include using advanced technology to identify CSAM, establishing clearer legal responsibilities for digital platforms, potentially allowing victims to pursue civil lawsuits, and possibly adjusting how evidence is handled in these cases. The exact provisions aren't detailed in this summary, but the broad subject categories suggest the bill takes a comprehensive approach to the problem. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee as of early 2025, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Further legislative action would be required before it could become law.
Enhanced Penalties for Criminal Flag Burners Act
# Enhanced Penalties for Criminal Flag Burners Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would increase criminal penalties for burning the American flag as a form of protest. Currently, flag burning exists in a legal gray area—the Supreme Court ruled in 1989 that burning a flag as political protest is protected speech under the First Amendment, but some states have laws against it anyway. This bill would create federal penalties (likely fines and/or prison time) specifically targeting flag destruction, attempting to establish a nationwide standard for prosecuting this act. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would directly impact anyone who burns a flag, though supporters argue it protects national symbols while critics contend it restricts free speech rights. The specific penalties aren't detailed in the available information, but such bills typically propose fines and possible jail time. This legislation would represent a federal attempt to criminalize an activity the Supreme Court previously protected as constitutionally-permitted political expression. **Current Status** As of now, S 2079 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was introduced by Senator Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) in the 119th Congress. Given the Supreme Court precedent protecting flag burning as speech, any law passing this would likely face immediate legal challenges.
Higher Wages for American Workers Act of 2025
# Higher Wages for American Workers Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Higher Wages for American Workers Act of 2025 (S 2013) is a proposed law currently being reviewed in the Senate. Based on its title, the bill is intended to address worker compensation, though specific details about its provisions are not publicly available in the summary provided. The bill was introduced by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) during the current congressional session. **Current Status** The bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. At this stage, it is still under review and could be modified, rejected, or advanced for further consideration depending on committee actions. **Note:** To provide you with specific information about what provisions the bill contains, who exactly it would affect, and what mechanisms it proposes to raise wages, I would need access to the full bill text. I'd recommend checking Congress.gov (the official congressional database) for the complete language and any available summaries from legislative analysts.
Reauthorizing Support and Treatment for Officers in Crisis Act of 2025
# Reauthorizing Support and Treatment for Officers in Crisis Act of 2025 **What the Bill Does** This bill would extend federal funding through 2029 for programs that provide mental health services and family support to law enforcement officers. These grants would go to state and local police departments, sheriff's offices, and other organizations that help officers cope with job-related stress, trauma, and personal crises. The bill essentially renews a program that was set to expire, keeping the federal money flowing for these support services. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects law enforcement officers and their families, as well as the police departments and community organizations that run these support programs. It could benefit officers struggling with mental health issues, PTSD from critical incidents, family problems, or substance abuse—challenges that are common in policing work. Taxpayers would also be affected through the continued federal spending on these programs. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It has not yet been scheduled for consideration.
No Handouts for Drug Advertisements Act
# No Handouts for Drug Advertisements Act (S 1785) – Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, sponsored by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO), would restrict government funding from being used to pay for pharmaceutical drug advertisements. Currently, some federal agencies may spend taxpayer money on ads promoting specific medications. This bill aims to prevent that practice by prohibiting federal funds from supporting such advertisements. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect pharmaceutical companies that receive federal advertising funds, federal health agencies that currently run drug promotion campaigns, and potentially patients who rely on government-funded health information. Taxpayers would theoretically see their money directed away from drug advertising. **Current Status** The bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No further action has been taken since its introduction, and it has not advanced in the legislative process.
Restoring Safeguards for Dangerous Abortion Drugs Act
# Summary: Restoring Safeguards for Dangerous Abortion Drugs Act **What the bill would do:** This bill seeks to restrict the use of mifepristone, a medication used in medication abortion procedures. Specifically, it would reinstate stricter federal regulations around how the drug can be distributed and used, reversing recent FDA decisions that relaxed those requirements. The bill would likely require in-person medical visits for obtaining the drug and impose other limitations on its availability compared to current rules. **Who it affects:** The bill would directly impact women seeking medication abortion and the healthcare providers who prescribe it. It would also affect pharmacies and clinics that distribute the drug. Indirectly, it touches on broader debates about reproductive healthcare access across the country. **Key provisions and current status:** While specific provisions aren't detailed in available summaries, such bills typically include requirements for in-person dispensing, limits on how far into pregnancy the drug can be used, and restrictions on mail distribution. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced for a full Senate vote. As a Republican-sponsored measure in the divided 119th Congress, its path forward remains uncertain.
No RTO Act
# No RTO Act Summary The **No RTO Act** (S 1604) is a bill introduced by Senator Josh Hawley that would restrict companies' ability to require employees to return to physical office locations. "RTO" stands for "return to office." If passed, this legislation would prevent employers from mandating that remote workers come back to work in-person, protecting employees' right to continue working from home. The bill would primarily affect workers and employers in the private sector who have shifted to remote or hybrid work arrangements. Key provisions of the bill would likely establish protections for remote workers and limit employer authority to impose return-to-office mandates. This would affect millions of American workers who transitioned to remote work during and after the COVID-19 pandemic and wish to maintain that flexibility. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. At this stage, it remains under consideration and discussion within the relevant congressional committee before any further action can be taken.
Fair Prescription Drug Prices for Americans Act
# Fair Prescription Drug Prices for Americans Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Fair Prescription Drug Prices for Americans Act (S. 1587) is a Republican-sponsored bill aimed at addressing prescription drug costs for American consumers. While the bill's specific provisions are not detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on mechanisms to reduce out-of-pocket drug expenses or increase price transparency in the pharmaceutical market. **Current Status and Impact** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a floor vote in the Senate. As a result, it has not become law. The bill was introduced by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO). Without access to the full legislative text and specific provisions, it's difficult to determine exactly which groups would be most affected, though such legislation generally impacts patients, insurance companies, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and healthcare providers. **Note:** To understand the precise details of this bill—including exact provisions, estimated costs, and potential effects—interested readers should consult the full text on Congress.gov or other legislative tracking resources, as the summary information available here is limited.