Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9]
Republican · NC · 16 bills sponsored
National Emergency Medical Services Memorial Extension Act
# National Emergency Medical Services Memorial Extension Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** HR 2196 would extend the deadline for completing a national memorial dedicated to emergency medical services (EMS) personnel in Washington, D.C. The bill allows for additional time to construct a monument honoring EMS workers—paramedics, EMTs, and other emergency medical responders—who have served the country and those who have died in the line of duty. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects EMS workers and their families, as well as organizations advocating for first responders. It also involves the National Park Service and any private groups or foundations responsible for designing and building the memorial. **Current Status:** HR 2196 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. This means it is still in the early stages of the legislative process and would require committee approval and a House floor vote to advance further.
Love Lives On Act of 2025
# Love Lives On Act of 2025 – Summary **What the bill would do:** The Love Lives On Act would allow surviving spouses of military members and veterans to keep certain financial benefits even if they remarry. Currently, remarriage can result in the loss of dependency and indemnity compensation (a monthly payment), special pension benefits, and military healthcare coverage (TRICARE). This bill would remove remarriage as a reason to stop these payments and benefits. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts surviving spouses of deceased active-duty military members, National Guard members, and veterans. It would also benefit remarried individuals whose second marriage has ended through death, divorce, or annulment, by allowing them to regain eligibility for military healthcare under TRICARE. **Current status:** HR 1004 was introduced by Representative Richard Hudson (R-NC) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House.
Replacement Parts Availability Act
# Replacement Parts Availability Act (HR 7181) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Replacement Parts Availability Act would require manufacturers to make spare parts available to consumers and independent repair shops for a reasonable price and timeframe. The bill aims to address situations where companies restrict access to replacement parts, forcing consumers to use expensive authorized repair services or discard products that could otherwise be fixed. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This legislation would impact manufacturers across various industries (appliances, electronics, agricultural equipment, etc.) as well as consumers and independent repair businesses. While specific provisions aren't detailed in available summaries, "right to repair" bills typically require manufacturers to provide parts, repair manuals, and diagnostic tools at fair prices, preventing companies from creating monopolies on repairs through artificial scarcity or proprietary restrictions. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7181 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill has Republican sponsorship but has not advanced to a floor vote. Similar "right to repair" measures have gained bipartisan interest in recent years, though they face opposition from some manufacturers concerned about intellectual property and safety issues.
Special Operator Protection Act of 2026
# Special Operator Protection Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Special Operator Protection Act of 2026 is a proposed law designed to provide protections for special operations forces—elite military personnel who conduct specialized, often high-risk missions. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to improve benefits, legal protections, medical care, or operational security for members of special operations units like Navy SEALs, Army Special Forces, and similar elite teams. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact special operations personnel and their families. It could also affect the military branches that oversee these units, the Department of Defense, and potentially veterans' services organizations that support this population. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 7136) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Richard Hudson, a Republican from North Carolina's 9th district. As of now, it remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To understand the bill's specific provisions, you would need to review the full legislative text on Congress.gov or contact the sponsor's office for more detailed information.
Next Generation 9–1–1 Act
# Next Generation 9-1-1 Act Summary **What It Does:** This bill would create a federal grant program to help states, territories, and tribal governments upgrade their emergency 9-1-1 systems to newer "next generation" technology. Modern NG9-1-1 systems use the internet instead of traditional phone lines, allowing emergency dispatchers to receive text messages, photos, and videos from callers—not just voice calls. They also have better ability to pinpoint a caller's exact location. The federal government would distribute grants through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to pay for upgrading systems, training staff, improving cybersecurity, and educating the public about the new capabilities. **Who It Affects:** State and local emergency services, first responders, and the general public would be affected. Emergency 9-1-1 call centers and the agencies that operate them would receive funding to modernize their infrastructure. Ultimately, anyone who calls 911 could benefit from faster, more accurate emergency response enabled by better technology. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 6505, 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Richard Hudson (R-NC).
Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act
# Summary of HR 3668: Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act **What the bill does:** This legislation speeds up the environmental review process for natural gas pipelines and liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals. Currently, multiple federal agencies review these projects separately, which can slow down approvals. The bill makes the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) the lead agency in charge, meaning other agencies must follow FERC's environmental review plan rather than conducting their own separate reviews. FERC would still be required to consult with other government agencies, including the Transportation Security Administration for security matters, and would need to involve state, local, and tribal governments in the process. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts companies seeking to build or expand natural gas pipelines and LNG facilities, which could see faster permitting timelines. It also affects federal agencies involved in environmental reviews, state and local governments, tribal nations, and potentially communities near pipeline projects. Environmental groups and energy companies have different perspectives on whether streamlining reviews is beneficial or concerning. **Current status:** The bill passed the House of Representatives and is pending consideration in the Senate as of this summary.
Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
# Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would allow people with concealed carry permits to bring their handguns across state lines without needing separate permits in each state. Currently, concealed carry laws vary significantly by state—some states have strict regulations while others are more permissive. This bill would create a federal framework allowing anyone legally permitted to carry a concealed handgun in their home state to do the same in other states that allow concealed carry. The bill would not apply to machine guns or destructive devices. **Who it affects and key provisions:** The bill would primarily affect gun owners who wish to travel with concealed handguns across state lines. A major provision would override many state and local gun laws by establishing federal standards that supersede stricter state regulations. The bill also allows people to sue in court if they believe their concealed carry rights have been violated, with provisions for recovering attorney's fees. **Current status:** The bill (HR 38) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Richard Hudson (R-NC) and is currently pending in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House.
RAPID Act
# RAPID Act Summary The RAPID Act (HR 5318) is a bill sponsored by Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC) that aims to streamline the process for developing telecommunications infrastructure, particularly for wireless communication networks. The bill focuses on reducing regulatory delays and environmental review requirements that typically apply to new telecom projects. Key provisions likely address how quickly companies can build cell towers and wireless infrastructure by modifying environmental assessments, federal review processes, and consultation requirements with Native American tribes and for historic sites. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact telecommunications companies building new infrastructure, federal agencies responsible for environmental review and FCC oversight, Native American tribes, and communities where new wireless towers would be constructed. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. As with most bills at this stage, it could be amended, debated, or stalled depending on committee priorities and political circumstances. *Note: Since this bill has not been publicly released in full detail, this summary is based on the listed subjects and typical provisions in similar telecom infrastructure bills. For specific language and exact provisions, the full text should be consulted on Congress.gov.*
RESULTS Act
# RESULTS Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 5269 (RESULTS Act) from the 119th Congress to provide you with accurate information about what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. Congressional bill titles can sometimes be acronyms that stand for longer official names, and without seeing the actual bill text, I cannot responsibly summarize its contents. To get this information, I'd recommend: - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching for "HR 5269" to see the full bill text and summary - Checking the bill's status page, which typically includes summaries written by the Congressional Research Service - Reviewing the sponsor's official website for a description of their legislative intent I want to give you accurate, factual information rather than guess at a bill's contents. Would you like help finding these resources, or do you have the bill text you'd like me to summarize?
When Minutes Count for Emergency Medical Patients Act
# When Minutes Count for Emergency Medical Patients Act (HR 3443) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill aims to improve emergency medical response times by removing barriers that may delay treatment for patients experiencing life-threatening emergencies. While specific details aren't fully available in the provided information, the title suggests the legislation focuses on streamlining emergency medical procedures or protocols to ensure faster care when every minute matters—such as in cases of heart attacks, strokes, or severe trauma. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact emergency medical services (EMS), hospital emergency departments, and patients requiring urgent care. It could also affect healthcare providers, insurance companies, and regulatory agencies involved in emergency medical treatment. **Current Status:** As of the 119th Congress, HR 3443 is in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Richard Hudson (R-NC). **Note:** Without access to the full bill text, this summary is based on the title and general framework. For complete details about specific provisions and how the bill would work, you'd need to review the full legislative text on Congress.gov.
Transparency and Honesty in Energy Regulations Act
# Transparency and Honesty in Energy Regulations Act (HR 3147) **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to increase transparency and accountability in how federal agencies regulate energy. While specific details aren't available in the provided information, based on the title, it would likely require energy regulatory agencies to be more open about their decision-making processes and the reasoning behind their rules. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's still in early stages of consideration and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. **Who It Affects:** This bill could impact energy companies (oil, gas, renewable energy, etc.), federal regulatory agencies like the Department of Energy and EPA, and ultimately consumers who pay energy bills. States and environmental groups would likely also be affected depending on the specific provisions. **Current Status:** HR 3147 is sponsored by Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC) and remains in committee review. Without access to the detailed bill text or specific provisions, it's unclear exactly what transparency measures it would mandate or how strictly it would regulate agencies. To understand the full impact, you would need to review the complete bill text on Congress.gov.
SIFIA Act
# SIFIA Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 2440 (the SIFIA Act) from the 119th Congress, so I can't provide you with accurate information about what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. Congressional bill summaries require specific details about the bill's text and intent, and I want to avoid giving you incorrect information. **To get accurate details, I'd recommend:** - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching for "HR 2440" to see the full bill text, sponsors' summaries, and any available official descriptions - Checking the bill's official summary section, which Congress.gov provides - Looking at the bill sponsor's website or press releases for their explanation of the legislation's purpose If you can share the bill's summary or key provisions, I'd be happy to help you understand and explain them in plain language!
SPEED for BEAD Act
# SPEED for BEAD Act Summary **What It Does:** This bill would modify the federal Broadband, Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program, which distributes federal funding to help expand internet access across the country. The main changes would broaden which types of internet technology can receive funding—currently, the program favors fiber-optic networks, but this bill would equally allow satellite, fixed wireless, and other broadband technologies to qualify as long as they meet certain performance standards. The bill would also prevent states from regulating or controlling broadband rates for services funded through the program. **Who It Affects:** States, territories, and the District of Columbia would be directly affected, as they administer BEAD funding in their regions. Internet service providers offering different technologies (satellite, wireless, fiber) would benefit from expanded funding eligibility. Communities seeking broadband expansion would be impacted by which technologies receive priority. States' regulatory authority would be limited under the proposed changes. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 1870) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It has not advanced further in the legislative process.
PLASMA Act
# PLASMA Act Summary **What It Does:** The PLASMA Act would gradually reduce the mandatory discounts that drug manufacturers must provide for plasma-derived medicines (medications made from blood plasma) under Medicare's prescription drug program. Currently, manufacturers must discount these drugs by 10% during the initial coverage phase and 20% once patients reach catastrophic coverage levels. The bill would phase in lower discounts starting in 2026—beginning at just 1% and gradually increasing to the full 10% and 20% levels by 2030-2032. This phase-in period would give manufacturers several years before reaching the current discount requirements. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects Medicare patients who use plasma-derived medications (such as treatments for bleeding disorders, immune deficiencies, and certain infections), drug manufacturers of these products, and taxpayers who fund Medicare. Patients could potentially face higher out-of-pocket costs if manufacturers don't pass savings through, while the pharmaceutical industry would retain more revenue during the transition period. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 1476), meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been scheduled for a full vote by the House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Richard Hudson (R-NC).
Protect Medicaid Act
# Protect Medicaid Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Protect Medicaid Act would prevent the federal government from paying for administrative costs related to Medicaid coverage for immigrants who are ineligible for the program based on their immigration status. Currently, the federal government shares costs with states for Medicaid administration. This bill would change that for cases involving undocumented immigrants or others deemed ineligible due to immigration status. The bill also requires the Department of Health and Human Services to report information about which states are providing health benefits to these individuals. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects undocumented immigrants and other non-citizens who don't qualify for Medicaid under federal law, as well as states that currently use their own funds to provide health coverage to these populations. States like California and New York that offer state-funded health programs to ineligible immigrants could see reduced federal reimbursement for administrative expenses. Healthcare providers and Medicaid programs in these states could also be indirectly affected. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (as of the 119th Congress) and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. This means it remains in the early stages of the legislative process and may not advance further.
Congressional Award Program Reauthorization Act
# Congressional Award Program Reauthorization Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would extend funding and authorization for the Congressional Award Program through 2028. The program recognizes and encourages young Americans who demonstrate service, initiative, and achievement in their communities. The bill also makes a technical change by removing specific requirements about what materials the program's medals must be made from, giving administrators more flexibility in how they manufacture awards. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects young people who participate in the Congressional Award Program, as well as the board that runs the program. It has minimal impact on the general public but supports youth-focused community service and recognition efforts. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.