Gimenez, Carlos A. [R-FL-28]
Republican · FL · 6 bills sponsored
Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act
# Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would expand the Miccosukee Reserved Area—land designated for the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians in Florida—to include a portion of Everglades National Park called Osceola Camp. It would also require the Department of the Interior to work with the Miccosukee Tribe to protect buildings at Osceola Camp from flooding through appropriate measures. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill primarily affects the Miccosukee Tribe, which would gain control over additional land, and the Department of the Interior, which would need to implement flood protection measures. The bill was introduced by Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-FL) but was vetoed, meaning the president rejected it and it did not become law. A veto can potentially be overridden if Congress votes to do so, but that did not happen in this case.
Department of Homeland Security Vehicular Terrorism Prevention and Mitigation Act of 2025
# Summary of HR 1608: Department of Homeland Security Vehicular Terrorism Prevention and Mitigation Act of 2025 **What the Bill Does** This legislation requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to create a comprehensive report assessing how the federal government can better prevent and respond to vehicular terrorism—attacks that use vehicles as weapons. The report must identify current and emerging threats, evaluate vulnerable locations (such as airports, government buildings, and critical infrastructure), describe how DHS coordinates with other law enforcement agencies, and recommend new technologies that could help detect and deter such attacks. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects DHS and related federal agencies tasked with national security. However, its recommendations could influence security measures at airports, public transit systems, government facilities, and other high-risk locations that the general public uses. State and local law enforcement agencies may also be impacted if new coordination efforts or technologies are implemented. **Current Status** The bill has already passed the House of Representatives and is now awaiting action in the Senate. The bill is largely procedural in nature—it directs a study and report rather than implementing specific new security measures immediately—though the recommendations could lead to policy changes or funding for new security technologies down the line.
Women’s and Family Protection Act of 2025
# Women's and Family Protection Act of 2025 - Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a detailed summary of this bill. While I can see the basic information (bill number HR 3319, sponsor Rep. Carlos Gimenez of Florida, currently in committee), the bill's actual text and specific provisions aren't visible in the information provided. Without access to the legislative language, I cannot accurately describe what it would do, who it affects, or what its key provisions are. To get an accurate summary, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov**: Search "HR 3319" for the full bill text, sponsor statement, and any available summaries - **House Clerk's Office**: For committee assignment details - **Official House member website**: Rep. Gimenez's office may have a press release explaining the bill's purpose This ensures you get factual, accurate information directly from official legislative sources rather than my interpretation of limited details.
Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act
# HR 1166: Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act **What it does:** This bill prevents the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from buying batteries made by six specific Chinese companies, starting October 1, 2027. The goal is to reduce U.S. dependence on batteries from countries considered adversarial and protect national security. DHS can request exceptions if they determine the Chinese batteries pose no security risk and there are no comparable American or allied alternatives available at similar cost and quality. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts DHS procurement practices and the federal agencies, contractors, and equipment manufacturers that supply batteries to DHS. It could also influence broader U.S. battery supply chains and domestic battery production industries by encouraging development of non-Chinese alternatives. **Key provisions:** DHS must notify Congress within 15 days whenever they grant an exception to the ban. The law allows limited waivers for research, testing, and evaluation purposes. DHS is also required to report to Congress on anticipated impacts, presumably to track compliance and effectiveness. **Status:** The bill has passed the House and is awaiting Senate action.
Keep China Out of Solar Energy Act of 2025
# Keep China Out of Solar Energy Act of 2025 — Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would restrict Chinese involvement in the U.S. solar energy industry. It would likely prevent federal procurement (government purchasing) of solar equipment from Chinese companies and establish new regulations to limit Chinese ownership or control of solar manufacturing facilities in the United States. The bill would also require government studies and investigations into China's role in the American solar supply chain. **Who It Affects:** The legislation would impact solar companies operating in the U.S., federal agencies that purchase solar equipment, consumers who may see changes in solar costs, and the renewable energy industry broadly. It could affect Chinese solar manufacturers that currently export to or operate in America, as well as American solar companies that source materials from Chinese suppliers. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in early 2025 by Representative Carlos Gimenez (R-FL) and is currently under committee review. It has not yet been voted on or passed by the full House of Representatives. *Note: This summary reflects the bill's stated purpose and categories based on available information. The full legislative text would contain specific implementation details.*
Port Crane Security and Inspection Act of 2025
# Port Crane Security and Inspection Act of 2025 - Summary **What it does:** This bill aims to protect U.S. ports from potential cybersecurity threats by restricting the use of foreign-owned cranes. Specifically, it would ban new cranes manufactured by companies controlled by countries designated as U.S. adversaries from operating at American ports. For cranes already in use, the bill gives port operators five years to replace any software or technology components made by foreign adversary-controlled companies. The federal Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) would be tasked with inspecting foreign cranes to identify security risks before they operate. **Who it affects:** This legislation primarily impacts port operators and shipping companies that use cargo cranes, as well as foreign crane manufacturers. Ports across the U.S. that handle international shipping would need to comply with the new requirements and may face costs associated with upgrading or replacing equipment. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 1165), meaning it has been introduced in the House of Representatives but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. It was sponsored by Rep. Carlos Gimenez, a Republican from Florida.