Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9]
Republican · VA · 23 bills sponsored
To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to John W. Ripley for acts of valor during the Vietnam War, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 7211 **What the Bill Does** HR 7211 is a special authorization bill that allows the President to award the Medal of Honor—the highest military decoration in the United States—to John W. Ripley for his actions during the Vietnam War. The Medal of Honor is typically awarded to service members who display extraordinary heroism and bravery in combat. This bill essentially gives the President legal authority to make this specific award to Ripley, even if it falls outside the normal timeframe for Medal of Honor nominations. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill directly affects John W. Ripley, a Vietnam War veteran. The Medal of Honor would recognize his acts of valor during the conflict. While the bill's primary purpose is straightforward, the phrase "and for other purposes" is included in the title, though specific additional provisions are not detailed in the information provided. **Current Status** The bill has passed both the House of Representatives and the Senate, meaning it has completed its journey through Congress. It now awaits the President's signature to become law, which would officially authorize the Medal of Honor award to Ripley.
To direct the Architect of the Capitol to install an adult changing room in the Library of Congress and the Capitol Visitor Center.
# Bill Summary: Adult Changing Room Installation **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7614 would require the Architect of the Capitol (the official responsible for maintaining Capitol buildings) to install adult changing rooms in two locations: the Library of Congress and the Capitol Visitor Center. An adult changing room is an accessible facility designed to accommodate adults who need assistance with personal care tasks. **Who It Affects and Key Details** This bill would primarily benefit adults with disabilities or medical conditions who require changing facilities while visiting these public spaces. Currently, such facilities are not standard in these buildings. The bill places the responsibility for installation and maintenance on the Architect of the Capitol, a position that already oversees Capitol building maintenance and improvements. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7614 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) during the 119th Congress.
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for the regulation of cannabinoid hemp products, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 7212: Cannabinoid Hemp Products Regulation Bill **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7212 proposes to create federal regulations for hemp-derived cannabinoid products (such as CBD, delta-8, and delta-10 products). Currently, these products operate in a legal gray area under federal law. The bill would amend the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to establish clear rules about how these products can be manufactured, labeled, tested, and sold to consumers. **Who It Affects** This bill would impact hemp farmers and manufacturers producing cannabinoid products, retailers selling these items, and consumers purchasing them. It could also affect the FDA's regulatory responsibilities. States that have already created their own cannabinoid regulations might need to align with federal standards, depending on how the bill is written. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee (not yet voted on by the full House), meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process. As of now, there is no public information about specific provisions, floor votes, or progress toward passage.
New Source Review Permitting Improvement Act
# New Source Review Permitting Improvement Act (HR 161) - Summary **What it does:** This bill would change how the EPA determines when industrial facilities need to obtain new air pollution permits. Currently, if a facility makes changes that could increase pollution emissions, it typically needs a new permit. This bill would narrow that requirement by only classifying a change as a "modification" (requiring a permit) if the facility's maximum hourly emissions would be higher than at any point during the previous 10 years. The bill also exempts changes specifically designed to reduce pollution, improve safety, or maintain reliable operations from needing new permits. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects industrial facilities and power plants that modify their operations, as well as state and federal environmental agencies that review permits. Environmental advocates argue it could ease the regulatory burden on polluters, while supporters contend it reduces unnecessary red tape for companies making operational improvements. **Current status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Morgan Griffith (R-VA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House.
Power Plant Reliability Act of 2025
# Power Plant Reliability Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill does:** This bill changes how the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) can keep power plants operating when their closure might threaten the reliability of the electrical grid. Currently, only state utility commissions can ask FERC to keep a plant open. The bill would also allow transmission organizations (companies that manage the power lines connecting different regions) to make this request. If FERC agrees a plant is needed for grid reliability, it can order the plant to stay open for up to five years, with possible extensions. **Who it affects:** Power plant owners, regional transmission organizations, electricity consumers, and state utility commissions. The bill could potentially keep older or less profitable power plants operating longer than market forces alone would support, which could affect energy prices and grid stability. **Key provisions:** FERC must act if a power plant's closure would make electricity service inadequate within five years. The agency can set whatever rates or charges are necessary to keep the plant running. Both state commissions and transmission organizations can request extensions beyond the initial five-year period. **Status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and awaits Senate consideration.
Legislative Branch Agencies Clarification Act
# Legislative Branch Agencies Clarification Act (HR 6028) - Summary **What the bill does:** This bill would change how three top officials in Congress's support agencies are selected and removed: the Librarian of Congress, the Director of the Government Publishing Office (GPO), and the Register of Copyrights. Instead of the President appointing these positions (as happens now), a bipartisan congressional commission would choose them. The bill also makes it harder to remove these officials—requiring a majority vote from both Republican and Democratic leaders in both chambers of Congress. Additionally, the bill would make the Copyright Office independent rather than supervised by the Library of Congress. **Who it affects:** This primarily affects Congress itself and the three agencies involved. It could indirectly impact the public who use these services, including copyright holders, library patrons, and people who access government publications through the GPO. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (not yet voted on by the full House). It was introduced by Representative Morgan Griffith, a Republican from Virginia.
PAVE Act
# PAVE Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 5736 (the PAVE Act) from the 119th Congress, so I can't provide you with accurate information about what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 5736" for the full text, summary, and sponsor details - **Your representative's website** - Often includes their sponsored bills with explanations - **Nonpartisan sources** like the Congressional Research Service summaries If you can share the bill's actual text or more details about its subject matter, I'd be happy to help summarize it in plain language.
Efficient Nuclear Licensing Hearings Act
# Efficient Nuclear Licensing Hearings Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Efficient Nuclear Licensing Hearings Act would streamline the process the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) uses to hold public hearings when licensing nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities. Rather than requiring full formal hearings for every licensing decision, the bill would allow the NRC to use more efficient hearing procedures in certain circumstances, potentially reducing the time and complexity of the licensing process. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects nuclear power plant operators and companies seeking NRC licenses, as well as members of the public who participate in NRC licensing hearings. Environmental and public interest groups that typically engage in these hearings could also be impacted by changes to hearing procedures. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. No additional details about specific provisions are available in the current legislative information. The bill was introduced by Representative H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA).
Contact Lens Prescription Verification Modernization Act
# Contact Lens Prescription Verification Modernization Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would update federal rules governing how contact lens prescriptions are verified. Currently, eye care providers (optometrists and ophthalmologists) must verify prescriptions through a specific process before patients can obtain contacts from retailers. The bill aims to modernize this verification system, though the specific changes aren't detailed in the available summary information. **Who It Affects** The bill impacts several groups: patients who wear contact lenses, eye care providers who issue prescriptions, and retailers (online and brick-and-mortar) that sell contact lenses. Any changes to verification procedures could affect how quickly patients receive their contacts and how providers and sellers conduct business. **Current Status** HR 4282 is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) in the 119th Congress. For more specific details about what changes the bill proposes to verification procedures, you would need to consult the full bill text.
Washington, D.C. Residents Voting Act
# Washington, D.C. Residents Voting Act (HR 3877) - Summary **What It Would Do** This bill addresses voting rights for Washington, D.C. residents. Based on its title, it would likely establish or modify voting procedures for D.C. residents, though the specific provisions are not detailed in the available information. D.C. has a unique political status as the nation's capital, which has historically limited residents' voting representation in Congress. **Who It Affects** The bill directly affects the approximately 700,000 residents of Washington, D.C., who currently have limited federal voting representation. They can vote in presidential elections but do not have voting representation in Congress, though they do have a non-voting delegate in the House. **Current Status** As of now, HR 3877 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was sponsored by Representative H. Morgan Griffith, a Republican from Virginia. *Note: Without access to the bill's detailed text, this summary reflects what can be inferred from its title. For complete information on specific provisions, the full legislative text should be consulted.*
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing".
# Summary of H.J. RES 61 **What It Does:** This bill cancels an EPA rule that set pollution standards for rubber tire manufacturing plants. The rule, finalized in November 2024, required tire manufacturers to control emissions of hazardous air pollutants during the rubber processing stage of production. By signing this resolution, Congress rejected the EPA's new environmental regulation. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts rubber tire manufacturers, who would have had to comply with stricter emissions controls under the EPA rule. It also affects air quality in communities near tire manufacturing facilities and indirectly affects consumers who purchase tires, though the impact on tire prices or availability is unclear. **Current Status:** The bill has already been signed into law, meaning the EPA's tire manufacturing emissions rule has been officially nullified and will not take effect. The resolution was sponsored by a Republican representative from Virginia and used Congress's authority to overturn federal regulations through a disapproval process.
Federal Bird Safe Buildings Act of 2025
# Federal Bird Safe Buildings Act of 2025 (HR 3268) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would require federal buildings to adopt design standards and practices that reduce bird collisions with structures. Millions of birds die annually from flying into buildings, and this legislation aims to minimize those deaths by mandating safety measures on government-owned or operated facilities. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly impacts federal agencies that manage or own buildings, which would need to implement bird-safe features. Indirectly, it affects bird conservation efforts and could serve as a model for private buildings and state/local governments to follow similar practices. **Key Provisions:** While specific details aren't provided in the available information, typical bird-safe building measures include installing bird-friendly glass treatments (patterns or decals that make glass visible to birds), reducing reflective surfaces, improving lighting systems, and designing landscaping to discourage collisions. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 901 West Main Street in Radford, Virginia, as the "Richard H. Poff Post Office Building".
# HR 2260 Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would officially rename the post office located at 901 West Main Street in Radford, Virginia to the "Richard H. Poff Post Office Building." The change is purely ceremonial and would honor Richard H. Poff through the naming of the facility. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects Radford, Virginia residents and postal customers who use this facility. It has no practical impact on postal services or operations—it's a symbolic tribute rather than a functional change. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA-9) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Building naming bills like this one are relatively common in Congress and often pass with bipartisan support when they honor notable local figures.
Physician Led and Rural Access to Quality Care Act
# Physician Led and Rural Access to Quality Care Act (HR 2191) Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill aims to improve healthcare access in rural areas by emphasizing physician-led care models. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, it's designed to address healthcare shortages and quality issues in rural communities—areas that often struggle to attract and retain doctors. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts rural Americans who face limited access to medical care, as well as physicians practicing in rural regions. It could also affect healthcare organizations and systems serving these communities. **Current Status:** HR 2191 is currently in committee, meaning it's being reviewed and debated but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. To learn about the bill's specific policy proposals (such as whether it addresses Medicare reimbursement rates, regulatory changes, or funding mechanisms), you would need to review the full legislative text, which is available through Congress.gov.
Royalty Transparency Act
# Royalty Transparency Act (HR 1863) Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Royalty Transparency Act would require federal employees to disclose any royalties, licensing fees, or other payments they receive from intellectual property (such as books, patents, or creative works). The bill aims to increase transparency around government workers' outside income sources and potential conflicts of interest, particularly for employees in sensitive positions. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions:** The legislation would primarily impact federal employees, requiring them to report royalty payments to their agencies. This disclosure requirement is designed to help Congress and agencies monitor whether government employees have financial interests that could conflict with their official duties. The bill falls under broader ethics and transparency initiatives meant to prevent corruption and ensure public trust in government. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 1863 is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate House committee for review and discussion but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. The bill was introduced by Representative H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) in the 119th Congress.
Risky Research Review Act
# Risky Research Review Act Summary **What it would do:** This bill would create a new independent government agency called the Life Sciences Research Security Board to review and approve federal funding for high-risk biological research. "High-risk" research includes studies on dangerous pathogens (like Ebola) or organisms that could be modified to become more transmissible or deadly. The board would decide whether research can be funded and what safety controls must be in place. Research institutions seeking federal funding would need to declare whether their work is considered high-risk, and federal agencies would have to verify these declarations and submit high-risk proposals to the board for approval. **Who it affects:** This primarily impacts universities, medical research institutions, and other organizations that receive federal research funding from agencies like the National Institutes of Health. It also affects government agencies that award research grants and employees who would work for the new oversight board. **Current status:** The bill is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Rep. H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) in the current congressional session.
HALT Fentanyl Act
# HALT Fentanyl Act Summary **What It Does:** The HALT Fentanyl Act would permanently classify all fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I controlled drugs—the most restrictive category under federal law. This means these drugs would be treated as having no accepted medical use and high abuse potential. The bill would apply the same criminal penalties to fentanyl-related substances as currently apply to fentanyl itself, including mandatory 10-year prison sentences for trafficking 100 grams or more. The bill also creates a new registration process for researchers who need to study these substances. **Who It Affects:** This legislation primarily impacts drug traffickers and those convicted of fentanyl-related crimes, who would face consistent federal penalties. It also affects researchers and pharmaceutical companies studying fentanyl compounds, by establishing clearer rules for obtaining federal approval to conduct research on Schedule I drugs. **Current Status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and awaits consideration in the Senate. The act is part of broader federal efforts to combat the opioid crisis, particularly the spread of illicit fentanyl and its synthetic variants, which have contributed significantly to overdose deaths in recent years.
Domestic SUPPLY Act of 2025
# Domestic SUPPLY Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the bill does:** The Domestic SUPPLY Act would require the federal government to buy personal protective equipment (PPE)—like masks, gloves, and gowns—primarily from American manufacturers rather than relying on foreign sources. The bill aims to ensure the U.S. has a domestic supply chain for PPE during public health emergencies like pandemics. The Department of Health and Human Services would establish agreements with eligible American manufacturers to stockpile and produce these supplies. **Who it affects and key requirements:** The bill primarily affects domestic manufacturers (who would have new business opportunities with the federal government) and the government agencies that purchase PPE. To qualify, manufacturers must be majority-owned by U.S. citizens and manufacture most of their products domestically, with a requirement to produce 100% of their PPE domestically by 2028. The Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security would help coordinate the program. The bill also establishes "Buy American" requirements, meaning the federal government could only purchase foreign-made PPE in limited exceptions. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
____ Act
# HR 571 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change who can receive Social Security child's benefits by adding a financial test for students aged 18 and older. Currently, students in elementary or secondary school can collect Social Security benefits based on their parent's or guardian's work history. Under this bill, those students would lose eligibility if their parent or guardian meets three conditions: they receive Social Security benefits, are at least 67 years old, and earned more than $125,000 in the previous year. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects older students (18+) who are still in high school and whose parents or guardians are already collecting Social Security with significant annual earnings. It's relatively narrow in scope, as it only applies to families where the parent/guardian is both already receiving Social Security and earning substantial income above the $125,000 threshold. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the child tax credit with respect to stillbirths.
# Summary of HR 570: Child Tax Credit for Stillbirths **What the bill would do:** HR 570 would allow parents who experience a stillbirth to claim the federal child tax credit on their taxes. Currently, the child tax credit provides up to $2,000 per qualifying child, but stillborn children do not qualify. This bill would expand the definition of a "qualifying child" to include stillbirths that occur after at least 20 weeks of pregnancy. Parents could then claim this tax credit for a stillborn child born to them. **Who it affects and key details:** The bill would primarily affect families who have experienced a stillbirth, potentially reducing their federal income taxes. The bill defines a stillborn child as an unborn baby carried for 20 weeks or more of pregnancy that was delivered after spontaneous fetal death. This is a relatively narrow policy change focused on providing financial relief to grieving parents during an already difficult time. **Current status:** HR 570 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill has not advanced beyond the initial committee stage.
To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Fairlawn, Virginia, and for other purposes.
# HR 279 Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would require the U.S. Postal Service to assign Fairlawn, Virginia its own unique ZIP Code, rather than sharing one with other areas. Currently, Fairlawn appears to be served by a shared or regional ZIP Code. If passed, residents and businesses in Fairlawn would have a dedicated five-digit code for their location. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects residents and businesses in Fairlawn, Virginia, a town in southwestern Virginia. A dedicated ZIP Code could make mail delivery more efficient and help local businesses with addressing and identification purposes. The U.S. Postal Service would be responsible for implementing the change. **Current Status** HR 279 was introduced by Representative H. Morgan Griffith (R-Virginia) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill has not advanced beyond the initial committee stage.
BROADBAND Leadership Act
# BROADBAND Leadership Act Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would limit how much power state and local governments have to regulate where telecommunications companies build or upgrade their infrastructure (like cell towers, fiber optic cables, and internet equipment). The bill prevents states and localities from treating different internet providers unfairly or blocking broadband improvements. However, states and localities could still charge reasonable fees to review requests or use public property. **Who It Affects:** The bill impacts internet and telecommunications companies seeking to expand or improve service, state and local governments that currently oversee these projects, and ultimately the public who may see faster broadband deployment. States and municipalities would lose some regulatory authority over how telecom infrastructure is placed in their communities. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 278) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Rep. H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. It has not advanced further at this time.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and adjust for inflation the above-the-line deduction for teachers.
# HR 228 Summary: Teacher Tax Deduction Increase **What It Does:** This bill would increase the tax deduction available to K-12 teachers and school staff for out-of-pocket classroom expenses. Currently, teachers can deduct up to $300 per year for unreimbursed costs like classroom supplies and professional development courses. The bill would raise this limit to $1,000 starting in 2025, and automatically adjust it upward each year to account for inflation. **Who It Affects:** The deduction applies to teachers, instructors, counselors, principals, and aides who work at least 900 hours per school year in public or private K-12 schools. An above-the-line deduction reduces the amount of income subject to tax, which can provide meaningful tax relief for educators who spend their own money on classroom materials. **Current Status:** HR 228 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Rep. H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA). The bill aims to help offset the financial burden many teachers face when purchasing supplies and training for their classrooms.