Fedorchak, Julie [R-ND-At Large]
Republican · ND · 10 bills sponsored
North Dakota Trust Lands Completion Act of 2025
# North Dakota Trust Lands Completion Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would authorize the transfer of federal land to North Dakota to complete the state's "trust lands" — land that was promised to North Dakota when it became a state in 1889. The bill aims to resolve a long-standing dispute over whether North Dakota received all the land it was entitled to under the original statehood agreement. If passed, it would finalize these land transfers and clarify the rights and responsibilities related to these lands. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects North Dakota state government and potentially Native American tribes, since it involves Indian lands and resources. It could also impact federal land management agencies that currently oversee these properties. The outcome may influence how these lands are used for education, development, or other state purposes. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (HR 2252) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Rep. Julie Fedorchak, a Republican from North Dakota.
High-Capacity Grid Act
# High-Capacity Grid Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The High-Capacity Grid Act (HR 6633) aims to modernize and expand the nation's electrical grid infrastructure to support increased power demands. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on streamlining the process for building new transmission lines, upgrading existing power infrastructure, and ensuring the grid can handle growing electricity needs from population growth, industrial development, and increased electrification. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact electricity consumers, utility companies, rural communities that often have outdated grid infrastructure, and industries reliant on reliable power supplies. It may also affect landowners whose property could be used for new transmission infrastructure. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. It was sponsored by Rep. Julie Fedorchak, a Republican from North Dakota. At this stage, the bill is being reviewed and discussed in the relevant House committee, and no further action has occurred.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
# HJRES 105 Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill cancels a new land management plan for federal lands in North Dakota that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) created in January 2025. The plan had updated rules for how over 1 million acres of public land should be managed going forward. By passing this resolution, Congress essentially said "no" to the BLM's new plan and reverted back to the previous management rules from 1988. **Key Details and Impact** The BLM's 2025 plan had placed restrictions on oil and gas development in certain areas and limited where new coal mining could occur. These restrictions would have limited some energy development on federal lands in North Dakota. By canceling this plan, those restrictions are removed, making it easier for oil, gas, and coal companies to develop these resources. The resolution primarily affects energy companies operating in North Dakota, environmental groups (who supported the restrictions), and North Dakota's economy, which depends significantly on energy production. **Status** The bill has already been signed into law, so it is now official. It was sponsored by Representative Julie Fedorchak, a Republican from North Dakota.
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 840 Front Street in Casselton, North Dakota, as the "Commander Delbert Austin Olson Post Office".
# Summary of HR 1830 **What the Bill Does** This bill would rename the U.S. Postal Service facility located at 840 Front Street in Casselton, North Dakota, to the "Commander Delbert Austin Olson Post Office." The change is a tribute to Commander Delbert Austin Olson. Renaming federal buildings is a common practice Congress uses to honor individuals with significant contributions to their communities or the nation. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill directly affects the postal facility and its operations in Casselton, North Dakota. It has already passed the House of Representatives and is now awaiting action in the Senate. The bill was sponsored by Representative Julie Fedorchak, a Republican from North Dakota.
Fair Allocation of Interstate Rates Act
# Fair Allocation of Interstate Rates Act (HR 6336) Summary **What It Does:** This bill aims to address how interstate rates—charges for services or utilities that cross state lines—are allocated and divided among states. The specific provisions are not detailed in the available information, but the bill's title suggests it would establish fairer methods for distributing these costs among states. This type of legislation typically affects how costs for interstate commerce, utilities, or transportation services are divided up. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact states, utility companies, and potentially consumers who pay for interstate services. North Dakota, the home state of sponsor Rep. Julie Fedorchak, may have particular concerns the bill addresses, though the bill would apply nationally. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 6336 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill has not advanced to a floor vote, so it has not become law. Without additional details on the bill's specific provisions being publicly available, it's unclear what exact changes to rate allocation it proposes.
Promoting Cross-border Energy Infrastructure Act
# Promoting Cross-border Energy Infrastructure Act - Summary **What It Does:** This bill creates a new streamlined approval process for energy projects that cross the U.S. border with Canada or Mexico. Instead of the current system based on executive orders, companies would need to obtain a "certificate of crossing" from federal agencies before building or operating pipelines, power lines, or other energy infrastructure that imports/exports oil, natural gas, or electricity across the border. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) would handle oil and gas pipelines, while the Department of Energy (DOE) would oversee electric transmission lines. **Who It Affects:** Energy companies planning cross-border projects, the federal agencies that approve them (FERC and DOE), and potentially consumers and communities near the U.S.-Mexico and U.S.-Canada borders. The bill could impact energy trade relationships with Canada and Mexico. **Current Status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives. It would need Senate approval and the President's signature to become law.
CABLE Expansion Act
# CABLE Expansion Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The CABLE Expansion Act (HR 5311) would modify federal regulations governing cable television and broadcasting. While the specific provisions aren't detailed in the summary provided, the bill's focus areas suggest it would address how cable and digital services are licensed and regulated at the federal level, potentially affecting how states and localities can oversee these industries. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily impact cable television providers, broadcasters, and the companies that offer digital services. It could also affect state and local governments that currently have regulatory authority over cable operations, as well as consumers who use cable and broadcast services. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Julie Fedorchak (R-North Dakota). --- *Note: To provide more detailed information about specific provisions, the full text of the bill would need to be reviewed, as the summary provided focuses mainly on general subject areas.*
Baseload Reliability Protection Act
# Baseload Reliability Protection Act Summary **What It Would Do** The Baseload Reliability Protection Act aims to protect power plants that provide consistent, around-the-clock electricity to the grid—primarily coal and nuclear facilities. The bill would likely establish protections or incentives for these "baseload" power sources to remain operational, potentially through subsidies, tax benefits, or regulatory changes. Baseload plants are valued because they run continuously regardless of weather conditions, unlike solar and wind farms that depend on sun and wind availability. **Who It Affects** This legislation would directly impact coal and nuclear power plant operators, their workers, and communities dependent on these industries. More broadly, it affects electricity consumers and grid reliability nationwide. Environmental advocates and renewable energy companies would likely oppose the bill, while traditional energy industry supporters would favor it. **Current Status** As of now, HR 3843 remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress but has not yet been passed or enacted into law. No specific provisions are publicly detailed in available summaries, so the exact mechanisms for protecting baseload plants remain unclear without accessing the full bill text.
Ending Intermittent Energy Subsidies Act of 2025
# Ending Intermittent Energy Subsidies Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, officially called the "Ending Intermittent Energy Subsidies Act of 2025," would eliminate federal subsidies and tax incentives for "intermittent" energy sources—primarily wind and solar power. These are called "intermittent" because they depend on weather conditions and don't generate power continuously. The bill targets financial support programs that currently help these renewable energy industries develop and expand. **Who It Affects:** The legislation would impact wind and solar energy companies that currently receive federal tax credits, grants, and other financial support. It would also affect consumers and energy markets, since removing subsidies could increase electricity costs in some regions or slow the growth of renewable energy infrastructure. Energy companies in the fossil fuel industry could see reduced competition from subsidized renewables. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee (H.R. 2838), meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process. It was introduced by Rep. Julie Fedorchak (R-ND) and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill has not advanced to a vote or passed either chamber.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Review of Final Rule Reclassification of Major Sources as Area Sources Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act".
# Summary of HJRES 79 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would overturn an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule from September 2024 that requires certain industrial facilities to maintain strict emission standards even if they downsize their operations enough to be reclassified as "area sources" rather than "major sources." Specifically, the rule keeps facilities that emit persistent and bioaccumulative hazardous air pollutants (substances that accumulate in the environment and living organisms) subject to major source pollution controls. The bill uses a congressional procedure called the Congressional Review Act, which allows Congress to block recent regulations without requiring the President's signature. **Who It Affects:** Industrial facilities that emit certain toxic air pollutants—potentially including chemical plants, manufacturers, and other industrial operations—would be most directly affected. Environmental groups and communities near these facilities could be impacted by any resulting changes to air quality standards. States and the EPA would also be involved in implementation. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the House by Rep. Julie Fedorchak (R-ND) and is currently in committee. It has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill's supporters likely argue the EPA rule is burdensome to industry, while opponents would likely argue it protects public health and the environment.