Fischbach, Michelle [R-MN-7]
Republican · MN · 13 bills sponsored
Federal Funds Whistleblower Protection Extension Act
# Federal Funds Whistleblower Protection Extension Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7824 proposes to extend whistleblower protections for employees who report misuse or waste of federal funds. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in available records, whistleblower protection laws generally shield workers from retaliation (like firing or demotion) when they report illegal activity, fraud, or waste of government money to appropriate authorities. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect federal employees and potentially contractors working on federal projects. It could also indirectly benefit taxpayers by encouraging reporting of government waste and fraud. The extension aspect suggests the bill would expand or lengthen protections that currently exist under law. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7824 remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Michelle Fischbach (R-Minnesota) in the 119th Congress. For more detailed information about the specific provisions being proposed, you would need to consult the full text on Congress.gov, as the summary details aren't currently available.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove the income limitation on the exclusion from gross income of any medal or prize money won in competition in the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games.
# Summary of HR 7731 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change federal tax law to allow Olympic and Paralympic medal winners to exclude all their prize money from their taxable income, without any income limit. Currently, U.S. tax code allows athletes to exclude medal and prize money, but only if their total income stays below a certain threshold (currently around $1 million). This bill would remove that cap entirely, meaning even high-earning athletes could exclude their Olympic winnings from federal taxes. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects U.S. athletes who compete in the Olympic and Paralympic Games. In practice, this would benefit a relatively small number of people—primarily elite athletes who win medals and whose overall income might otherwise exceed the current exclusion limit. The bill would reduce federal tax revenue from these athletes, though the financial impact would likely be modest given the small number of people involved. **Current Status** HR 7731 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Michelle Fischbach, a Republican from Minnesota. No action has been taken on the bill at this time.
Supporting Pregnant and Parenting Women and Families Act
# Supporting Pregnant and Parenting Women and Families Act - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill allows states to use federal welfare funds (specifically Temporary Assistance for Needy Families or TANF money) to support pregnancy centers. These centers would provide services like pregnancy testing, prenatal education, relationship counseling, and material assistance such as diapers and baby clothes to pregnant women, fathers, and families. The bill requires these centers to focus on supporting both the mother and the unborn child. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects pregnant women and families with limited financial resources, as well as states and the pregnancy centers that would receive funding. It also impacts how federal welfare dollars are allocated, since states could now direct TANF funds toward these centers instead of other poverty assistance programs. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives. It would need Senate approval and the President's signature to become law. The bill is supported by Republican sponsors and focuses on expanding support options for pregnant women and families.
Habitat Enhancement Now Act
# Habitat Enhancement Now Act (HR 4591) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Habitat Enhancement Now Act aims to improve and restore natural habitats across the United States. While specific details about the bill's provisions aren't provided in the available information, habitat enhancement bills typically focus on protecting and restoring ecosystems like wetlands, forests, grasslands, or wildlife corridors that have been degraded or lost. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would likely impact wildlife, conservation organizations, landowners (particularly those managing natural lands), and communities that depend on healthy ecosystems. It may also affect federal and state agencies responsible for environmental management. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Michelle Fischbach (R-Minnesota). To learn the specific provisions and funding mechanisms, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov, as the summary information available is limited.
To establish limitations on advanced payments for bus rolling stock, and for other purposes.
# HR 3586 Summary **What the Bill Does** HR 3586 would allow state and local public transportation agencies to use federal grants to make partial advance payments toward bus purchases. Specifically, transit authorities could pay up to 20% of a bus order upfront without requiring the bus manufacturer to provide a financial guarantee (called a performance bond). Currently, federal rules make such advance payments more difficult. To qualify for this flexibility, agencies would need to have a signed purchase order and an executed contract with a manufacturer that includes advance payment terms. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects public transit agencies and bus manufacturers. Transit systems that receive federal grants—which serve millions of commuters nationwide—could benefit from faster bus procurement. Bus manufacturers might also benefit by receiving partial payment earlier in the production process. Indirectly, it could affect taxpayers and transit riders if it speeds up bus fleet purchases or affects costs. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Michelle Fischbach (R-Minnesota) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. No action has been taken to advance it further at this time.
Law Enforcement Education Grant Program Act of 2025
# Law Enforcement Education Grant Program Act of 2025 (HR 3436) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would establish a federal grant program to help pay for education and training of law enforcement officers. While specific details about grant amounts, eligibility requirements, and program structure aren't publicly detailed yet, the bill's purpose is to provide financial support for police and other law enforcement personnel pursuing education opportunities. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect law enforcement agencies and their officers, who could receive funding for training and educational programs. It could also impact state and local governments that employ police forces, as well as educational institutions that train law enforcement personnel. **Current Status** HR 3436 was introduced by Representative Michelle Fischbach (R-Minnesota) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To become law, it would need to pass through committee review, receive a House vote, pass the Senate, and be signed by the President.
MOMS Act
# MOMS Act Summary The **MOMS Act** (More Opportunities for Moms to Succeed Act) is a bill introduced in the House that would make three main changes to support pregnant women and new mothers. First, it would allow states to collect child support payments starting during pregnancy (rather than after birth), if the mother requests it. Second, it would provide federal grants to nonprofits that offer services to pregnant women and mothers with young children—such as healthcare, childcare information, and housing assistance—but specifically excludes abortion-related services. Third, the bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services to create a website listing pregnancy resources that don't include information about abortions. The bill primarily affects pregnant women, mothers with young children, and fathers who owe child support. Nonprofits that support pregnant women and new mothers could benefit from the new federal grant funding. As of now, the bill is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House.
Investing in Rural America Act of 2025
# Investing in Rural America Act of 2025 - Summary **What It Does** This bill would allow Farm Credit System (FCS) institutions—organizations that provide loans to farmers and rural businesses—to participate in the Department of Agriculture's Community Facilities program. Currently, only certain lenders can participate in this program, which funds essential facilities in rural areas like hospitals, fire stations, schools, water systems, and other community services. The bill expands who can lend money for these projects. **Key Rules and Who It Affects** The bill includes safeguards: FCS institutions could only dedicate up to 15% of their total loans to community facilities, and they would need to give other lenders a chance to participate in projects before committing their own money. This primarily affects rural communities that need funding for essential services, as well as FCS institutions themselves, which would gain new lending opportunities. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Rep. Michelle Fischbach (R-Minnesota) and is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House.
Hearing Device Coverage Clarification Act
# Hearing Device Coverage Clarification Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would clarify Medicare coverage for a specific type of hearing device called a "fully implanted active middle ear hearing device." Currently, there's confusion about whether Medicare considers these devices to be hearing aids or prosthetics. The bill would officially classify them as prosthetics, which would make them covered under Medicare benefits. This is important because Medicare typically doesn't cover hearing aids, but it does cover prosthetic devices. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects Medicare beneficiaries (seniors and some disabled individuals) who have hearing loss and might benefit from this particular implantable technology. It could also affect the manufacturers and medical professionals who provide these devices, as clarified coverage could increase patient access and use of this option. **Current Status:** HR 1921 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Michelle Fischbach (R-Minnesota) in the 119th Congress.
Protecting Rural Seniors’ Access to Care Act
# Summary of HR 1683: Protecting Rural Seniors' Access to Care Act **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to improve healthcare access for elderly people living in rural areas. While the specific legislative language isn't detailed in the summary provided, the bill's focus areas include Medicare and Medicaid coverage, nursing care, long-term care facilities, and hiring of healthcare workers. The legislation would likely address rules and regulations that affect how seniors in rural communities receive medical services. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily targets senior citizens in rural areas, as well as healthcare providers, nursing homes, and long-term care facilities serving those regions. It may also impact state and local governments that administer Medicaid programs, and healthcare workers in rural settings. **Current Status** As of now, HR 1683 is in committee and has not been voted on or passed. The bill was introduced by Representative Michelle Fischbach (R-Minnesota). Since it remains in the early legislative stage, it could be modified, stalled, or advanced depending on committee review and congressional priorities.
Protecting America’s Seniors’ Access to Care Act
# Summary of HR 1303: Protecting America's Seniors' Access to Care Act **What the bill would do:** This bill would block a new federal rule issued in May 2024 that sets minimum staffing requirements for long-term care facilities (nursing homes and similar facilities). Specifically, it would prevent enforcement of requirements that nursing homes have a nurse on-site 24 hours a day and maintain an average of 3.48 nursing hours per resident daily. The bill would also block a requirement for states to report how much Medicaid money goes to direct care workers and support staff at these facilities. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts nursing home residents, particularly Medicare and Medicaid patients who rely on these programs for coverage. It also affects nursing homes themselves, long-term care workers, and state Medicaid programs that would have had to implement the new reporting requirements. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. Supporters argue the staffing rule could increase costs and operational challenges for facilities, while opponents contend that minimum staffing standards are necessary to ensure quality care and resident safety.
Defund Planned Parenthood Act of 2025
# Defund Planned Parenthood Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would stop federal funding to Planned Parenthood and its clinics for one year unless the organization agrees not to perform abortions (except in cases of rape, incest, or when pregnancy endangers a woman's life). If Planned Parenthood doesn't meet this requirement, the federal government would demand repayment of any funds already received. The bill would redirect some of that federal money to community health centers instead, which would face the same abortion-related restrictions. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly impacts Planned Parenthood's operations and funding. It would also affect patients who use Planned Parenthood for healthcare services like cancer screenings, contraception, and other family planning services. Additionally, community health centers would receive increased federal funding as an alternative provider. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (HR 271) is in committee, meaning it's still in the early stages and has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Rep. Michelle Fischbach (R-MN).
Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2025
# Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would prohibit organizations that receive federal funding from performing abortions or funding other organizations that perform abortions. The main exceptions would be for abortions in cases of rape, incest, or when the pregnancy poses a serious threat to the woman's life. Organizations would need to certify compliance with these restrictions to continue receiving federal money. **Who it affects:** This would impact hospitals, clinics, research institutions, and other healthcare providers that receive any federal funding—including Medicare, Medicaid, and federal grants. It could affect millions of patients who rely on federally-funded facilities for healthcare services. **Current status:** The bill (HR 272) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Michelle Fischbach (R-MN) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill reflects ongoing congressional debate over abortion policy and federal funding priorities.