Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5]
Republican · NC · 12 bills sponsored
Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act
# Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill, formally titled the "Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act," aims to address how federal funds are spent on child care programs. While the specific provisions aren't detailed in the basic information available, bills with this title typically focus on oversight, accountability, and fraud prevention in federal child care subsidies and assistance programs. The bill would likely establish new requirements or restrictions on how child care providers use government funding. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would potentially impact child care providers who receive federal funding, families using child care assistance programs, and taxpayers funding these initiatives. Depending on its specific provisions, it could affect how child care centers operate, what services they can offer, or how they report their use of federal dollars. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process. It has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Bills in committee may be debated, amended, or could stall without further action. *Note: More detailed information about specific provisions would require access to the full bill text.*
Unfunded Mandates Accountability and Transparency Act of 2025
# Summary: Unfunded Mandates Accountability and Transparency Act of 2025 **What the Bill Does:** This bill aims to increase oversight and transparency around "unfunded mandates"—federal requirements that states, local governments, tribes, and businesses must follow without receiving federal funding to pay for them. The legislation would require the federal government to better track, measure, and report the costs these mandates impose on others, and would likely give Congress and the public more information about the financial impact before new mandates are enacted. **Who It Affects:** State and local governments, Native American tribes, small businesses, and consumers would be the primary groups affected. These entities often bear significant costs when complying with federal regulations—from environmental rules to labor standards—without federal money to cover those expenses. The bill could also affect federal agencies like the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which would likely handle much of the analysis and reporting. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 580, 119th Congress), meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative Virginia Foxx (R-NC). The bill addresses administrative procedures and regulatory oversight, suggesting its intent is to make the federal regulatory process more transparent and accountable to the states and local entities affected by it.
Official Time Reporting Act
# Official Time Reporting Act Summary **What It Would Do** The Official Time Reporting Act would require federal government agencies to publicly report detailed information about how much time their employees spend on union-related activities while on the clock. "Official time" refers to paid work hours that federal employees—particularly those in unions—are allowed to use for union business, such as contract negotiations, grievance handling, or representing coworkers. This bill would mandate greater transparency by requiring agencies to track and disclose these records. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily impacts federal employees who are union members and the agencies that employ them (such as the Postal Service, Veterans Affairs, and other federal departments). It would also affect labor unions representing federal workers, as the reported data could influence public and political discussions about union activities and government costs. **Key Provision & Current Status** The main provision requires agencies to report official time usage publicly, likely in a centralized government database. This would give Congress and the public visibility into the scope and cost of union activities during work hours. As of now, the bill is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To amend title 36, United States Code, to designate the composition known as "Here Rests in Honored Glory" by Donald B. Miller as the national hymn of the United States.
# Summary of HR 6188 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 6188 proposes to officially designate a composition titled "Here Rests in Honored Glory," written by Donald B. Miller, as the national hymn of the United States. If passed, this would make it the official hymn through an amendment to Title 36 of the U.S. Code (which contains federal laws about patriotic symbols and observances). **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill would primarily affect national ceremonial practices and symbolic representations of the United States. While the U.S. has a national anthem ("The Star-Spangled Banner"), it does not currently have an official national hymn. The bill contains no other major provisions—it is a straightforward measure to establish this single designation. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Virginia Foxx (R-NC) and remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a floor vote in the House of Representatives. No further action has been taken on the measure.
Union Members Right to Know Act
# Union Members Right to Know Act (HR 6139) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to increase transparency and give union members more information about how their unions operate and spend money. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the basic bill information available, bills with this title typically require unions to disclose financial information and activities to their members more regularly and comprehensively than current law requires. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect union members and the unions themselves. It could also indirectly impact employers who work with unionized workforces, depending on what disclosure requirements are included. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 6139 remains in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Virginia Foxx (R-NC) in the current congressional session. *Note: To understand the specific provisions and detailed impact, you would need to review the full bill text, as the summary provided here doesn't include those specifics.*
SOAR Act Improvements Act
# SOAR Act Improvements Act Summary **What It Does:** The SOAR Act Improvements Act would expand and extend the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program, a federal initiative that provides scholarships to help low-income students in Washington, D.C. attend private schools. The bill would extend the program through 2032, add pre-kindergarten students to those eligible for scholarships, and streamline the grant process by allowing nonprofits managing the program to renew their federal grants for up to five years without reapplying each year. **Key Changes:** The bill modifies how students are admitted when more applicants want scholarships than available spots. Currently, schools must use random selection; the bill would allow schools to instead follow their own admission standards and procedures. The bill maintains a requirement that participating schools be properly accredited. **Who It Affects & Current Status:** The legislation primarily affects low-income families in Washington, D.C., private schools in the area, and the nonprofit organizations that administer the scholarship program. The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act of 2025
# Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act of 2025 (HR 4795) is currently in committee and has not yet been fully detailed in public records. Based on its title, the bill appears designed to address concerns about restrictions on economic expression and academic freedom, though specific provisions are not publicly available at this time. Without access to the bill's text, it's difficult to specify exactly what changes it would implement or which existing laws or policies it would modify. **Who It Affects and Status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) in the 119th Congress and remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. Once the bill's full text becomes available, it would likely affect higher education institutions, potentially students and faculty, and possibly businesses, depending on which economic and academic policies the legislation targets. **Next Steps:** To learn more about this bill's specific provisions and impact, you may want to check Congress.gov for the complete bill text once it becomes publicly available, or monitor the relevant congressional committee proceedings.
Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance Act
# Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance Act (HR 1465) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would restrict U.S. foreign aid from supporting organizations and activities related to abortion services. Specifically, it would prohibit federal funds provided through foreign assistance programs from being used by any organization that performs abortions, provides abortion referrals, or advocates for abortion access—even if those funds are designated for other purposes like maternal health or disease prevention. The restrictions would apply globally to all organizations receiving U.S. international aid. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact international health organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and clinics abroad that receive U.S. government funding. It would also affect countries and populations that depend on these organizations for health services. Healthcare providers that offer comprehensive reproductive health services—including abortion—could lose access to American financial support entirely. **Current Status** As of now, HR 1465 is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate House committees for review and debate but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Virginia Foxx (R-NC). Similar restrictions on foreign aid related to abortion have been implemented and repealed by different administrations in the past.
Families’ Rights and Responsibilities Act
# Families' Rights and Responsibilities Act (HR 650) Summary The Families' Rights and Responsibilities Act would expand parental authority over children's education, healthcare, and development. The bill addresses parental notification and consent requirements in schools, parental access to health information, and liability protections for parents. It would affect families with school-age children, educators, healthcare providers, and potentially childcare facilities. The bill covers topics including education decisions, medical care choices, and religious upbringing. **Key areas the bill would likely impact include:** parental notification about school activities and curricula; parental consent for certain health services; access to student records; and legal protections for parents making family decisions. The bill also appears to address court costs and liability in family-related legal matters. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. As of now, it remains in the early legislative stage, meaning it has not advanced to a floor vote. *Note: For specific details on exact provisions and implications, you may want to review the full bill text on Congress.gov, as the summary here reflects the general subject areas and typical provisions of bills with this title.*
Qualified Immunity Act of 2025
# Qualified Immunity Act of 2025 - Summary **What It Does:** This bill would create a federal law protecting police officers from civil lawsuits when they're accused of violating someone's constitutional rights. Currently, courts use a judge-made rule called "qualified immunity" that shields officers from liability unless they violate rights that were "clearly established." This bill would write that protection into law rather than leaving it to court decisions alone. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly impacts law enforcement officers at all levels (local, state, and federal), who would gain stronger legal protection against civil lawsuits. It also affects citizens who believe their constitutional rights were violated, as it could make it harder for them to sue officers for damages. The bill applies to cases involving Fourth Amendment violations (illegal searches) and other constitutional breaches. **Current Status:** The bill is still in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) and remains under consideration. This is a politically contentious issue—supporters argue it's necessary to protect officers doing their jobs, while critics contend it shields officers from accountability for misconduct.
Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act
# Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would prohibit the federal government from giving family planning grants (through the Department of Health and Human Services) to any organization that performs abortions or funds other organizations that do so. Organizations receiving these grants would have to sign agreements promising not to provide abortions during the grant period. The bill does include exceptions for abortions in cases of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is endangered by a medical condition. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects family planning clinics, community health centers, and other organizations that receive Title X federal funding to provide contraception, cancer screenings, STI testing, and other reproductive health services. Many of these organizations currently provide comprehensive reproductive health services, including abortion care. The bill would force them to choose between accepting federal grants and providing abortion services. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 343) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Virginia Foxx (R-NC) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Grant Integrity and Border Security Act
# Grant Integrity and Border Security Act (HR 245) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require anyone applying for federal grant money to sign a certification stating they haven't violated, aren't currently violating, and won't violate federal laws against smuggling or harboring undocumented immigrants. If a federal agency discovers that a grant recipient has violated these laws, the agency must stop paying them federal grant funds. The Department of Justice would also be required to report to federal budget officials anyone convicted of these immigration-related crimes or who admits to committing them. **Who It Affects:** This primarily affects organizations, businesses, and individuals who receive federal grants—including nonprofits, universities, contractors, and other grant recipients. It also impacts the Department of Justice and the Office of Management and Budget, which would need to track and report violations. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Virginia Foxx (R-NC) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a floor vote for consideration by the full House.