Fallon, Pat [R-TX-4]
Republican · TX · 16 bills sponsored
MERICA Act of 2025
# MERICA Act of 2025 Summary **What it does:** The bill expands opportunities for hardrock mineral mining on federal lands by making all federally owned land eligible for hardrock mineral leasing. Currently, only certain federal lands acquired under specific laws can be leased for hardrock mining, while other minerals like coal and oil can be leased more broadly. This bill would level the playing field by allowing companies to lease federal land for hardrock minerals (like copper, gold, silver, and gemstones) under the same general rules that apply to other mineral types. **Who it affects:** Mining companies would gain more opportunities to extract hardrock minerals from federal lands. States like Alaska (specifically mentioned in the bill) and other regions with significant mineral deposits could see increased mining activity. Environmental groups and conservation advocates oppose such measures, while the mining industry and resource-dependent communities generally support them. Taxpayers own these federal lands, so the decision affects public property management. **Current status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and now awaits consideration in the Senate.
Ensuring Federal Purchasing Efficiency Act
# Ensuring Federal Purchasing Efficiency Act (HR 7283) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to streamline how the federal government purchases goods and services. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on reducing bureaucratic processes, potentially consolidating purchasing rules, or modernizing procurement procedures to save taxpayer money and reduce waste in government spending. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact federal agencies that purchase supplies and equipment, as well as private businesses that sell to the government. Indirectly, it could affect taxpayers through potential cost savings or efficiency improvements in government operations. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early legislative stage and has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Rep. Pat Fallon (R-Texas) in the 119th Congress. *Note: The specific provisions of this bill are not detailed in the available information. For a complete understanding of what changes it proposes, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.*
Veterans Mental Health and Addiction Therapy Quality of Care Act
# Summary of HR 2426: Veterans Mental Health and Addiction Therapy Quality of Care Act **What the Bill Does** This bill would require the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to hire an independent organization to compare the quality of mental health and addiction treatment services offered by the VA against those provided by private (non-VA) providers. The independent organization would study different types of therapy and treatment approaches, then publish their findings publicly for anyone to see. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects veterans receiving mental health and addiction treatment through the VA system. It could also influence the VA itself and private healthcare providers, as the results might shape how services are delivered or funded in the future. **Key Provision and Status** The main provision requires an objective, outside organization—rather than the VA itself—to conduct the study, which is meant to ensure unbiased results. Currently, the bill is in committee, meaning it's still being reviewed by Congress and has not yet been voted on by the full House or Senate.
Securing Energy Supply Chains Act
# Securing Energy Supply Chains Act (HR 6853) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill, sponsored by Rep. Pat Fallon of Texas, aims to strengthen and protect the supply chains that deliver energy resources to the United States. While specific details aren't available in the basic summary provided, bills with this title typically focus on reducing dependency on foreign energy suppliers, securing domestic energy production and distribution networks, and ensuring reliable access to critical materials and equipment needed for energy generation and transmission. **Who It Affects:** The bill would potentially impact energy companies, manufacturers of energy equipment, workers in the energy sector, and ultimately American consumers who rely on electricity and other energy sources. It could also affect international trade relationships with countries that supply energy-related materials. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate congressional committee for review and debate but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House. This is an early stage in the legislative process, and the bill may be revised, debated, or potentially abandoned before reaching a final vote. *Note: For complete details on specific provisions, check Congress.gov or the bill's full text.*
District of Columbia Attorney General Appointment Reform Act of 2025
# Summary: District of Columbia Attorney General Appointment Reform Act of 2025 **What the bill would do:** This bill would change how Washington, D.C.'s Attorney General is selected. Currently, D.C. voters elect their Attorney General every four years. Under this bill, the President of the United States would instead appoint the Attorney General directly, and that appointment would not require Senate approval. The Attorney General's term would last as long as the President's term in office. The bill would also immediately end the current Attorney General's term upon passage. **Who it affects:** This primarily impacts Washington, D.C. residents, who would lose their direct voting power over this office. It also affects the sitting Attorney General, whose position would be eliminated. More broadly, it represents a significant shift in how D.C. governance works, taking a locally elected position and making it a presidential appointment instead. **Key provisions and status:** The bill removes the election process entirely and gives appointment power to the President without requiring Senate confirmation. Currently, the bill is in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process, meaning it has not been voted on by the full House or Senate.
To prohibit the Secretary of Defense from entering into software source code contracts with entities with certain relationships with China, and for other purposes.
# HR 3961 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prevent the U.S. Department of Defense from signing contracts with companies to develop or access software source code if those companies have certain business ties to China. The legislation aims to protect sensitive military technology and computer systems from potential foreign influence or security risks by restricting which private companies can work on classified or critical defense software projects. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects defense contractors and technology companies that work with the Pentagon. Any firm with significant financial relationships, ownership stakes, or business connections to Chinese entities could be barred from bidding on defense software contracts. This could impact how the Department of Defense sources software development and may narrow the pool of available contractors for certain projects. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Pat Fallon (R-TX) in the 119th Congress and is currently under review in committee. It has not yet advanced to a full House vote. The bill remains in the early legislative stage, meaning its final form and likelihood of passage have not been determined.
FAST Act
# FAST Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 3807 (the FAST Act from the 119th Congress) to provide you with an accurate summary of what it would do, who it affects, and its key provisions. **To get this information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching for "HR 3807" - you'll find the full bill text, sponsor details, and current status - Checking the bill's official summary section, which breaks down provisions in plain language - Looking at any committee reports if they're available If you can share the bill's summary or key provisions, I'd be happy to help you understand and explain them clearly. Many bills share similar acronyms (like various "FAST" acts over the years), so having the specific text would ensure accuracy.
Protecting AI and Cloud Competition in Defense Act of 2025
# Protecting AI and Cloud Competition in Defense Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to increase competition in artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud computing services used by the Department of Defense. Currently, a small number of large technology companies dominate contracts for these services. The legislation would require the Pentagon to open up more opportunities for smaller companies and competitors to bid on AI and cloud computing projects, rather than relying on a limited set of established vendors. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts the Department of Defense and the technology companies that sell AI and cloud services to the military. It could benefit smaller tech firms and startups seeking to compete for federal contracts, while potentially affecting the market position of large, established defense contractors and cloud providers who currently hold major Pentagon contracts. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (HR 3434) is in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the House but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. It was sponsored by Republican Representative Pat Fallon of Texas.
Federal Cyber Workforce Training Act of 2025
# Federal Cyber Workforce Training Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Federal Cyber Workforce Training Act of 2025 would establish or expand training programs to develop cybersecurity expertise among federal government employees. The bill aims to address staffing shortages in cybersecurity positions across federal agencies by creating pathways for workers to develop the technical skills needed to protect government computer systems and data. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect federal government agencies that need cybersecurity professionals, as well as federal employees seeking training opportunities in this field. It could also indirectly affect the private sector by potentially establishing standards or partnerships for cybersecurity workforce development. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee review, meaning it has been introduced in the House of Representatives but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. No additional details about specific training programs, funding amounts, or implementation methods are available in the limited information provided.
REG Budgeting Act of 2025
# REG Budgeting Act of 2025 Summary **What It Would Do:** The REG Budgeting Act of 2025 (HR 3279) would establish new budgeting requirements for federal regulations. While the bill's full details aren't specified in the available information, the title suggests it would create a system to track, limit, or manage the costs associated with new government regulations. This type of legislation typically aims to control regulatory expenses by requiring agencies to consider financial impacts before implementing new rules. **Who It Affects:** If passed, this bill would primarily affect federal agencies that create regulations, as well as businesses and individuals subject to those regulations. Companies of all sizes would potentially be impacted depending on how strict the budgeting requirements are, and citizens could see changes in which regulations get implemented. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. As a committee-level bill, it's still in the early stages of the legislative process. *Note: Complete details about specific provisions aren't available from the information provided. For more comprehensive details, you can review the full bill text on Congress.gov.*
Protecting Critical Infrastructure Act
# Protecting Critical Infrastructure Act (HR 3278) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill aims to strengthen the protection of critical infrastructure—the essential systems and facilities that Americans depend on daily, such as power grids, water systems, transportation networks, and communications. While the full details of specific provisions aren't available in this listing, bills with this title typically focus on enhancing security measures, improving information sharing between government agencies and private companies, and establishing clearer protocols for responding to threats or attacks on these vital systems. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact infrastructure operators (utility companies, transportation authorities), government agencies responsible for security and emergency response, and ultimately the general public who rely on these services. It may also affect cybersecurity companies and private sector partners involved in protecting these systems. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3278 is in committee, meaning it's still in the early legislative process and has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Pat Fallon (R-TX) in the 119th Congress. To learn more about its specific provisions, you can search for the bill on Congress.gov, where the full text and any updates will be available.
Special District Fairness and Accessibility Act
# Special District Fairness and Accessibility Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** HR 2766 is a proposed law that would address fairness and accessibility issues related to special districts. Special districts are local government entities created to provide specific services—like water management, fire protection, or schools—to particular areas. However, the bill details currently available don't specify what fairness or accessibility problems it aims to solve or what exact changes it would make. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. Pat Fallon (R-Texas) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Without more detailed legislative language available, it's unclear what specific provisions the bill contains or exactly who it would affect. **Note:** To fully understand this bill's impact, you would need to review the actual legislative text on Congress.gov or contact Rep. Fallon's office for more details about its specific provisions and intended effects.
SAFE Supply Chains Act
# SAFE Supply Chains Act Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the detailed text of HR 2765 (SAFE Supply Chains Act) needed to provide you with an accurate summary of its specific provisions. Congressional bill databases sometimes show limited information before bills are formally introduced with full text. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov**: Search for "HR 2765" to view the full text, sponsor information, and any amendments - **Rep. Pat Fallon's office website**: Often includes bill summaries and rationale - **House committee websites**: Check the relevant committee's page for hearing information and details If you can share the bill's text or more details about its provisions, I'd be happy to help summarize it for a general audience.
Kairo Act of 2025
# Kairo Act of 2025 - Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 2425 (Kairo Act of 2025) in my training data, so I cannot provide an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. While I can see it's a House bill sponsored by Representative Pat Fallon (R-TX) and is currently in committee, those details alone don't tell us the bill's actual content or purpose. **To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 2425" for the full text and summary - Checking your representative's official website - Looking at nonpartisan sources like the Congressional Research Service I want to avoid guessing at a bill's contents, as that could spread misinformation. If you can share the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow the production tax credit and investment tax credit for offshore wind facilities placed in service in the inland navigable waters of the United States or the coastal waters of the United States.
# HR 2187 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would remove federal tax credits for offshore wind energy projects built in U.S. waters. Currently, wind energy companies can claim two types of tax credits to help offset costs: a production tax credit (which rewards energy generation) and an investment tax credit (which rewards upfront construction costs). This bill would eliminate both credits specifically for offshore wind facilities located in inland waterways or coastal areas of the United States. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact wind energy companies developing offshore wind projects and potentially consumers who might see higher costs for offshore wind energy without these subsidies. More broadly, it could slow growth in the offshore wind industry, which is still developing in the U.S. but has been expanding, particularly on the East Coast. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Pat Fallon (R-TX) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It has not advanced to a vote at this time.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow the production tax credit and investment tax credit for offshore wind facilities placed in service in the inland navigable waters of the United States or the coastal waters of the United States.
# HR 1462 Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would remove federal tax credits for offshore wind energy projects built in U.S. waters. Currently, wind energy companies can claim tax credits that reduce their federal tax liability—a production tax credit (for electricity generated) and an investment tax credit (for building costs). This bill would eliminate those credits specifically for offshore wind facilities in inland waterways and coastal waters, making these projects less financially attractive to developers. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily targets wind energy companies considering offshore wind projects and would reduce their financial incentives to build in U.S. waters. Consumers in coastal regions could be affected if projects are delayed or canceled. The bill is sponsored by Rep. Pat Fallon (R-TX), suggesting support from some lawmakers concerned about offshore wind development. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process and has not advanced to a floor vote. Many bills at this stage do not pass into law.