Daines, Steve [R-MT]
Republican · MT · 42 bills sponsored
Montana Sportsmen Conservation Act
# Montana Sportsmen Conservation Act (S 3527) Summary **What the Bill Does** The Montana Sportsmen Conservation Act would establish protections and management frameworks for wildlife habitats, wilderness areas, and wild rivers in Montana. Based on its subject categories, the bill appears to focus on environmental monitoring, research, and conservation practices aimed at protecting natural areas and wildlife habitats while considering land-use activities in the state. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect Montana residents, hunters and anglers, conservation organizations, and landowners. It could also impact federal land management agencies responsible for wilderness areas and wildlife refuges in Montana, as well as any industries or activities operating on protected lands. **Current Status** As of now, S 3527 remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill was introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT). For more specific details about its exact provisions, you would need to review the full bill text, as the summary information available focuses on its general subject areas rather than specific policy measures. --- *Note: For complete information about provisions, fiscal impact, and recent activity, check Congress.gov*
A bill to amend the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 to require the Secretary of the Treasury to testify before Congress, and for other purposes.
# Bill Summary: S 3940 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would amend a 1994 law governing Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs)—specialized banks and lenders that serve low-income communities and underserved areas. The main requirement would force the Treasury Secretary to testify before Congress about these institutions. The bill's language includes the phrase "and for other purposes," which suggests it may contain additional provisions not fully detailed in the available information. **Who It Affects** The bill would directly impact the Treasury Department and Congress's oversight role. Indirectly, it could affect Community Development Financial Institutions themselves and the communities they serve (typically lower-income and rural areas that have limited access to traditional banking services). **Current Status** As of now, S 3940 remains in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. This means it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT). **Note:** Without access to the full bill text, the complete scope of "other purposes" cannot be determined from this summary alone.
Expanded Telehealth Access Act
# Expanded Telehealth Access Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Expanded Telehealth Access Act (S 3834) would broaden the availability and use of telehealth services—medical consultations and care delivered remotely via phone, video, or other digital means. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the basic information available, bills with this title typically aim to remove or reduce regulatory barriers that currently limit when and how doctors can provide remote care to patients, potentially including expanding Medicare coverage for telehealth services beyond current restrictions. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect patients seeking medical care (especially those in rural or underserved areas), healthcare providers offering remote services, and insurance programs like Medicare and Medicaid. The changes could also impact healthcare costs and access to specialists for people who face transportation challenges or live far from medical facilities. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's under review and has not yet advanced to a floor vote in the Senate. With no additional action noted, it remains in the early stages of the legislative process. Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) introduced the measure, and it would require committee approval and broader Senate support to move forward.
A bill to allow certain Federal minerals to be mined consistent with the Bull Mountains Mining Plan Modification, and for other purposes.
# Bill Summary: S. 362 – Bull Mountains Mining Plan Modification **What It Would Do** This bill would allow coal mining to proceed on approximately 800 acres of federal land in Musselshell County, Montana. Specifically, it directs the Department of the Interior to approve and implement the 2020 Bull Mountains Mining Plan Modification without delay or changes. The bill essentially streamlines the approval process for mining federal coal reserves under an existing lease (MTM 97988) operated by Signal Peak Energy. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Signal Peak Energy, the company operating the Bull Mountains Mine, which would gain expedited approval to extract coal from federal lands. It also impacts Montana's economy and coal industry workers. Environmental groups and communities concerned about land use and environmental impacts may also be affected by expanded mining operations on public lands. **Current Status** S. 362 is currently in committee in the 119th Congress (2025-2026). It was sponsored by Senator Steve Daines (R-Montana) and has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill involves environmental assessment and mining regulation, areas where there are often competing interests between energy development and environmental protection advocates.
Increasing Investor Opportunities Act
# Increasing Investor Opportunities Act (S 3671) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Increasing Investor Opportunities Act aims to expand investment options available to everyday Americans. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on removing regulatory barriers that limit who can invest in certain opportunities—such as private companies, startups, or alternative investments—that have traditionally been restricted to wealthy or institutional investors. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect individual investors seeking broader investment choices, as well as small businesses and startups that could gain access to a wider pool of potential funding sources. It may also impact investment firms and the financial services industry. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee review, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. For more detailed information about specific provisions (such as which investment restrictions would be changed), you would need to consult the full bill text on Congress.gov or contact Senator Daines's office.
Fort Peck Water System Reauthorization Act
# Fort Peck Water System Reauthorization Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would reauthorize the Fort Peck Water System, a water infrastructure project serving the Fort Peck Indian Reservation and surrounding areas in northeastern Montana. "Reauthorization" means Congress would renew its approval and funding authority for this existing water system, allowing it to continue operating and potentially be improved or expanded. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts the Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux tribes and residents of rural Montana who depend on this water system for drinking water and other uses. It could also affect water availability for agricultural and other regional purposes. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 3635) remains in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. This means it has not been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Steve Daines, a Republican from Montana. *Note: Additional details about specific funding amounts, infrastructure improvements, or other key provisions were not available in the basic bill information provided.*
Expand the Behavioral Health Workforce Now Act
# Expand the Behavioral Health Workforce Now Act - Summary **What the bill does:** This bill aims to address the shortage of mental health and substance abuse professionals in the United States by expanding the workforce in these fields. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on increasing training opportunities, loan forgiveness programs, or incentives for people to enter careers in behavioral health—such as psychology, counseling, social work, and addiction medicine. **Who it affects:** The bill would primarily benefit people struggling with mental health issues and addiction, particularly in underserved areas where there are few available providers. It would also affect aspiring behavioral health professionals by potentially making education more affordable or accessible, and healthcare systems dealing with provider shortages. **Current status:** As of now, S 3486 remains in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT). For more specific details about the bill's exact provisions, you can review the full text on Congress.gov.
Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025
# Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill modifies a 2010 water rights agreement between the Crow Tribe of Montana and the state of Montana. It makes technical and financial updates to help complete two major water projects on the Crow Reservation: repairs and improvements to the Crow Irrigation Project (which serves farmland on tribal lands) and development of a municipal and rural water system to provide drinking water and industrial water to the reservation. The bill establishes a special bank account—called the Crow CIP Implementation Account—to hold and manage federal funds dedicated to these water infrastructure projects. **Who It Affects:** The Crow Tribe of Montana is the primary beneficiary, as the bill directly supports water infrastructure improvements on their reservation. Montana state officials are also involved since the original agreement was between the tribe and the state. Farmers and residents on the Crow Reservation who depend on irrigation and water services would benefit from these improvements. **Current Status:** The bill has already passed the Senate and is moving through the legislative process. It had bipartisan support, being sponsored by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT).
Lower Yellowstone River Native Fish Conservation Act
# Lower Yellowstone River Native Fish Conservation Act Summary This bill aims to protect and restore native fish species in the Lower Yellowstone River, a section of the Missouri River system in Montana. The legislation would establish conservation measures for fish populations that have declined due to environmental changes and human activities. It addresses endangered and threatened fish species by directing resources and oversight toward habitat restoration and species recovery efforts in this region. The bill affects Montana residents, fishing communities, water users, and conservation organizations with interests in the Yellowstone River ecosystem. Key provisions would likely include Congressional oversight of conservation activities, funding for restoration projects, and coordinated management strategies for native fish protection. The bill focuses on balancing ecological restoration with existing water resource uses in the region. As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not been voted on by the full Senate. This means it is still in the early stages of the legislative process and requires further discussion and approval before it could become law.
Small County PILT Parity Act
# Small County PILT Parity Act Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would modify how Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) funds are distributed to counties. PILT is a federal program that compensates counties for tax revenue they lose because the federal government owns large amounts of land within their borders (national forests, parks, etc.). The bill would adjust the formula to provide more equitable funding to smaller counties that may be disproportionately affected by federal land ownership. **Who It Affects:** Small counties—particularly in rural areas with significant federal land holdings—would be the primary beneficiaries. These counties often struggle with reduced tax bases because they cannot collect property taxes on federally-owned land. The changes could also affect state budgets and potentially the federal budget, depending on how funding is redistributed. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (S 1175 in the 119th Congress), meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-Montana), a state with substantial federal land ownership.
Restoring State Mineral Revenues Act
# Restoring State Mineral Revenues Act Summary **What the bill does:** This bill would increase the amount of money states receive when oil, gas, coal, and other natural resources are extracted from federal lands within their borders. Currently, the federal government takes a 2% administrative fee from these payments before giving the money to states. The bill would eliminate that 2% fee, allowing states to keep the full amount instead. **Who it affects:** State governments (particularly those with significant federal lands, like Montana) would receive more revenue from resource development. Taxpayers might be indirectly affected depending on how states use this additional revenue. The oil, gas, and mining industries could benefit from the policy change, and Native American tribes with mineral rights on federal lands could also be impacted. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (S 451, 119th Congress), meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Steve Daines, a Republican from Montana.
A bill to authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) to products of certain countries.
# Summary of S 3103 **What the Bill Does** This bill would give the President broader authority to grant "normal trade relations" (NTR) status to foreign countries, which means reducing trade barriers and tariffs with those nations. Specifically, it would allow the President to waive or bypass the Jackson-Vanik amendment—a Cold War-era law that restricts trade with certain countries unless they meet strict freedom-of-emigration standards. The bill would also allow the President to grant permanent NTR status to most countries, with exceptions only for Belarus, Cuba, and North Korea. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect U.S. businesses that import and export goods, as well as consumers who buy foreign products. Countries seeking better trade relationships with the United States would also be impacted. The changes could lower costs for imported goods and create new export opportunities for American companies. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. No action has been taken since its introduction.
Relief of Chronic Pain Act of 2025
# Relief of Chronic Pain Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** This legislation aims to make certain non-opioid pain management drugs more affordable and accessible for Medicare beneficiaries (people 65 and older). Specifically, it would eliminate deductibles for these drugs, place them in the lowest cost-sharing tier possible, and prevent insurance plans from requiring patients to get prior approval or try alternative medications first before coverage is approved. The goal is to reduce barriers to these pain relief options as an alternative to opioids. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts Medicare recipients who suffer from chronic pain. It would also affect Medicare prescription drug plans that manage these benefits, as they would have new requirements for how they cover non-opioid pain medications. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No action has been taken beyond the initial introduction.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".
# Summary of SJRES 61 **What It Does:** This bill would block a land management plan decision made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for its Miles City Field Office in Montana. It uses a congressional procedure called a "resolution of disapproval" that allows Congress to overturn federal agency rules. If passed, the bill would cancel the BLM's approved resource management plan amendment for that office. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects public lands in the Miles City area of Montana and anyone with interests in how those lands are managed—including ranchers, energy companies, environmentalists, hunters, and other outdoor users. The decision would impact how federal land in eastern Montana is used for grazing, energy development, recreation, and conservation. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-Montana) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate or House. The specific details of what the BLM's plan amendment contained—and why it's being challenged—are not provided in this bill summary.
FAIR Act of 2025
# FAIR Act of 2025 - Summary I don't have access to the specific details of S. 2715 (FAIR Act of 2025) in my training data, so I cannot provide an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. Congressional bills often use acronyms that could stand for multiple things, and without the actual bill text, I cannot tell you what "FAIR" represents in this context. **What I can tell you:** - It's a Senate bill sponsored by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) - It's currently in committee review, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate - You can find the complete bill text and details at **Congress.gov** by searching for "S. 2715" To get an accurate summary, I'd recommend checking Congress.gov directly, where you'll find the official bill language, sponsor statement, and any summaries provided by the Congressional Research Service.
CDFI Fund Transparency Act
# CDFI Fund Transparency Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The CDFI Fund Transparency Act would require increased transparency and reporting requirements for the Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund, a federal program that provides funding to financial institutions serving low-income and underserved communities. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, transparency bills typically require clearer disclosure of how federal funds are used, their outcomes, and program effectiveness. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect the CDFI Fund program administrators, community development financial institutions that receive federal funding, and potentially the communities these institutions serve. Taxpayers and oversight bodies would also have greater visibility into how the program operates. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 2704) is in committee and has not yet advanced to a floor vote. It was introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) in the 119th Congress. The bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process. *Note: Limited details are publicly available about this bill's specific provisions. For complete information about what requirements it would impose, consult Congress.gov or the bill's full text.*
A bill to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to extend the time period during which licensees are required to commence construction of certain hydropower projects.
# Summary of S. 1020 **What the Bill Does** This bill would require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to give hydropower project developers more time to begin construction on licensed projects. Currently, developers must start building within a set deadline or risk losing their license. The bill would extend this deadline, allowing companies more time before they're required to break ground on dams and hydropower facilities. **Who It Affects and Why** The bill primarily affects hydropower companies that have received licenses from FERC to build power generation projects but haven't started construction yet. These developers argue they need more time due to permitting delays, financing challenges, and environmental reviews. Supporters say extending deadlines helps renewable energy projects move forward, while the bill relates to broader infrastructure and clean energy development goals. **Current Status** The bill has passed the Senate and is now awaiting action in the House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) and focuses on hydroelectric power, which is classified as a renewable energy source.
McCarran-Walter Technical Corrections Act
# McCarran-Walter Technical Corrections Act Summary This bill would make technical corrections to the McCarran-Walter Act, which is the foundational U.S. immigration law passed in 1952. "Technical corrections" means fixing minor errors, outdated language, and inconsistencies in the existing law rather than making major policy changes. The specific corrections proposed in this bill are not detailed in the available information, but such fixes typically address things like outdated terminology, conflicting provisions, or administrative procedures that have become unclear over time. The bill would primarily affect immigration agencies, legal professionals, and individuals involved in immigration cases who rely on clear, consistent immigration law. By clarifying the law's language and removing contradictions, it could help streamline immigration processing and reduce confusion in how the law is applied. **Current Status:** The bill (S. 2577) is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. It was sponsored by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT). Further details about which specific sections require correction are not available in the current bill summary.
Promotion and Expansion of Private Employee Ownership Act of 2025
# Promotion and Expansion of Private Employee Ownership Act of 2025 - Summary ## What It Would Do This bill aims to encourage and expand employee ownership of private companies. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on making it easier for employees to purchase stakes in their employers through mechanisms like Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) or similar programs. The goal is generally to increase worker investment in and ownership of their companies. ## Who It Affects The bill would primarily affect private sector employees and business owners. Employees could gain opportunities to own part of their company, while employers would benefit from provisions designed to facilitate these ownership transfers. Small to mid-sized businesses might be particularly impacted, as well as any workers in companies considering employee ownership structures. ## Current Status As of now, S. 2461 is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT). For more detailed information about specific provisions, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov, as the key provisions aren't summarized in the available information.
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.
# Summary: Flag Desecration Constitutional Amendment **What the Bill Would Do** This bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would allow Congress to pass laws making it illegal to physically destroy or damage the American flag. Currently, the Supreme Court has ruled that burning or desecrating the flag is protected speech under the First Amendment. If passed, this amendment would override that court decision and give Congress the power to criminalize such acts. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would potentially affect anyone who physically damages an American flag, making such actions subject to federal criminal penalties. To become law, this constitutional amendment would need to pass with two-thirds approval in both the House and Senate, then be ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures. There are no additional provisions listed in the available information. **Current Status** The bill (SJRES 58) is currently in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. It was introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-Montana) in the 119th Congress. Constitutional amendments are rarely passed due to their high threshold for approval, and this particular proposal has been introduced multiple times over the years without success.
PROTECT Act of 2025
# PROTECT Act of 2025 Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of S. 1967 (the PROTECT Act of 2025) in my training data, so I cannot accurately describe what this bill would do, which groups it affects, or its key provisions. Congressional bills with acronyms like "PROTECT" can address various topics—from child safety to election integrity to healthcare—and without access to the bill's actual text, I cannot responsibly summarize its contents. **What I can tell you:** This bill was introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. To get accurate information about this bill's specifics, I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** (official source for bill text and status) - **Senator Daines' official website** (for his explanation of the bill) - **Congressional research services** or nonpartisan policy organizations Would you like me to help you navigate these resources, or do you have the bill's text you'd like me to summarize?
Protecting Veteran Community Care Act
# Protecting Veteran Community Care Act - Plain Language Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would require the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to help veterans access mental health and substance-abuse treatment through community providers when the VA's own facilities can't serve them quickly enough. Specifically, if a veteran qualifies for priority mental health treatment but the VA can't accommodate them in a timely manner, or if the VA can't meet its own access standards for specialty care, the VA would be required to pay for treatment at outside community facilities instead. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects veterans struggling with mental health issues or substance abuse problems who need residential treatment (meaning they stay at the facility while receiving care). It also affects the VA's budget and operations, as the agency would need to cover the cost of community-provided care. **Key provisions:** The bill prevents the VA from denying veterans access to community care solely based on eligibility reasons, and it ensures that if the VA refers a veteran to an alternative program, that referral won't delay the veteran from getting timely mental health services—unless the veteran specifically requests the referral themselves. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate.
DRIVE Act
# DRIVE Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The DRIVE Act would prevent the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) from requiring large commercial trucks and buses to install speed-limiting devices. These devices would electronically cap how fast a vehicle can travel. The bill blocks any current or future regulations on this topic, responding to a federal proposal from 2022 about potential speed-limiting requirements. **Who It Affects** The bill applies to commercial vehicles weighing over 10,000 pounds—primarily large trucks and buses that operate across state lines. This includes semi-trucks used for interstate shipping and commercial passenger buses. Trucking companies and bus operators would be the primary beneficiaries, as they would retain flexibility in vehicle equipment choices. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. No action has been taken on the legislation at this time.
America the Beautiful Act
# America the Beautiful Act (S 1547) - Summary **What It Would Do:** The America the Beautiful Act is currently in committee and hasn't been assigned detailed subject matter yet, so its specific provisions aren't publicly documented in available records. Without access to the bill's full text or summary of its contents, it's not possible to describe what concrete changes it would make to law. **What We Know:** The bill was introduced by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) in the 119th Congress. The title suggests it may relate to conservation, public lands, national parks, or environmental protection—common themes for legislation with "America the Beautiful" in the title—but this cannot be confirmed without the actual bill language. **Current Status:** The bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. To find details about what this bill actually proposes, you can visit Congress.gov and search for "S 1547" to view the complete text, any amendments, or official summaries once they become available.