Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]
Democrat · IL · 78 bills sponsored
A bill to reauthorize programs relating to oral health promotion and disease prevention.
# S. 4008: Oral Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Reauthorization **What the Bill Does** This bill would extend and renew federal programs focused on promoting dental health and preventing tooth decay and gum disease. Rather than creating new initiatives, it "reauthorizes" existing programs—meaning it extends their funding and authority so they can continue operating. The specific programs affected aren't detailed in the basic bill information available, but these typically include grants to dental schools, community health centers, and public health campaigns. **Who It Affects** The bill would benefit dentists and dental schools receiving federal support, community health centers providing dental care, and ultimately the general public—particularly lower-income individuals and underserved communities that often rely on these programs for affordable dental care and education. **Current Status** S. 4008 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Further details about specific programs included and exact funding amounts would need to be reviewed in the full bill text.
A bill to focus limited Federal resources on the most serious offenders.
# Summary of S. 3959 **What the bill would do:** S. 3959 aims to redirect federal law enforcement resources toward prosecuting the most serious crimes. Rather than spreading resources across all types of offenses, the bill would establish priorities to focus on cases involving the most severe criminal conduct. The specific mechanisms for determining which cases qualify as "most serious" are not detailed in the limited information available, as the full legislative text would need to be reviewed for those details. **Who it affects:** This bill would impact federal prosecutors, law enforcement agencies, the federal court system, and individuals involved in criminal cases at the federal level. It could affect the prioritization of cases and resource allocation within agencies like the Department of Justice and FBI. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet moved forward for a full vote in the Senate. Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) sponsored the legislation. *Note: Without access to the full text, this summary reflects the general intent based on the title. For specific provisions and detailed impacts, the complete bill text should be consulted.*
A bill to give Federal courts additional discretion to determine whether pretrial detention is appropriate for defendants charged with nonviolent drug offenses in Federal criminal cases.
# S. 3960: Pretrial Detention Discretion for Drug Offenses **What the Bill Does** This bill would allow federal judges more flexibility in deciding whether to hold defendants in jail while waiting for their trial if they're accused of nonviolent drug crimes. Currently, federal law limits judges' discretion in these cases. The bill would give courts greater authority to consider individual circumstances—such as a defendant's ties to the community, employment, and criminal history—rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach to pretrial detention decisions. **Who It Affects** The bill directly affects people charged with nonviolent drug offenses in federal courts and indirectly affects the federal criminal justice system as a whole. It could reduce the number of defendants held in pretrial detention, potentially lowering jail costs and allowing defendants to better prepare their legal defense while remaining in their communities. **Current Status** S. 3960 was introduced by Senator Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Like most bills at this stage, its future passage remains uncertain.
A bill to establish the Julius Rosenwald and Rosenwald Schools National Historical Park, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 3925 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would create a new national historical park dedicated to Julius Rosenwald and the Rosenwald Schools. Julius Rosenwald was a prominent businessman and philanthropist who, in the early 1900s, funded the construction of thousands of schools across the American South, primarily serving African American students during the segregation era. The national park would preserve and interpret this important chapter of American history. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect communities in the South where Rosenwald Schools still exist or once stood. By establishing a national historical park, the legislation would provide federal protection, funding, and resources for these historic sites. This could help preserve remaining school buildings, support educational programs about Rosenwald's legacy and early 20th-century African American education, and increase public awareness of this historical movement. **Current Status** As of now, S. 3925 is in committee and has not advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was sponsored by Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-IL). Like many bills in Congress, it requires committee review and approval before moving forward in the legislative process.
A bill to require rulemaking by the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to address considerations in evaluating the need for public and individual disaster assistance, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 3895 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require FEMA (the Federal Emergency Management Agency) to create new rules and guidelines for how it evaluates whether communities and individuals qualify for disaster assistance after emergencies like hurricanes, floods, or other disasters. Currently, FEMA makes these decisions, but this bill would establish clearer, more detailed standards for how the agency should determine who gets help and why. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect FEMA's decision-making processes, which in turn impacts disaster victims, local governments, and communities seeking federal aid after catastrophes. It could also affect how quickly or consistently FEMA responds to disaster assistance requests. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Many bills in committee do not advance further in the legislative process.
Investing in Tomorrow's Workforce Act of 2026
# Investing in Tomorrow's Workforce Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Investing in Tomorrow's Workforce Act of 2026 is a proposed federal law aimed at strengthening job training and education programs for American workers. While specific details about the bill's provisions are not publicly available yet (it's still in early stages), bills with this title typically focus on funding vocational training, apprenticeships, community college programs, and other workforce development initiatives to help workers gain skills for in-demand jobs. **Who It Affects:** If passed, this bill would primarily impact workers seeking job training or career changes, employers looking to hire skilled workers, educational institutions offering training programs, and potentially the federal budget (through funding allocation). Community colleges, vocational schools, and apprenticeship programs would likely be key implementers. **Current Status:** As of now, S 3877 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the Senate but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. The bill was sponsored by Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL). To become law, it would need to pass through committee review, Senate floor debate and voting, House approval, and presidential signature.
Stop Corporate Inversions Act of 2026
# Stop Corporate Inversions Act of 2026 Summary **What It Would Do** This bill aims to prevent "corporate inversions"—a practice where U.S. companies relocate their headquarters to foreign countries (typically through mergers) to reduce their U.S. tax obligations. By moving their tax residence abroad while keeping operations in the U.S., companies can legally lower their federal tax bills. The Stop Corporate Inversions Act would make it harder or more costly for companies to pursue this strategy. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects large U.S. corporations considering moving their tax headquarters overseas and the federal government (since inversions reduce tax revenue). Shareholders, employees, and consumers could be indirectly affected depending on how companies respond to new restrictions. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee review (S 3847 in the Senate during the 119th Congress). This is an early stage in the legislative process, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill's future passage is uncertain and would depend on committee action and broader congressional support.
American Business for American Companies Act of 2026
# American Business for American Companies Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The American Business for American Companies Act of 2026 (S 3811) aims to strengthen protections and preferences for American businesses in federal contracting and procurement. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on ensuring that federal government contracts and purchases prioritize domestic companies and products, potentially including measures to reduce reliance on foreign suppliers for government purchases. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect American businesses competing for federal contracts, federal agencies that purchase goods and services, and potentially foreign companies seeking to do business with the U.S. government. American consumers could be indirectly affected depending on how the bill impacts federal spending and procurement costs. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee (S 3811, 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full floor vote in the Senate. Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) sponsors the legislation. For the most current information on its progress, you can check Congress.gov.
Prohibiting Tianeptine and Other Dangerous Products Act of 2026
# Prohibiting Tianeptine and Other Dangerous Products Act of 2026 - Summary **What It Does:** This bill would prohibit the sale and distribution of tianeptine, a drug that is not currently approved by the FDA but is being sold in the U.S. under names like "Za Za Red" and "Tianna." Tianeptine is a prescription antidepressant in other countries but is marketed here as a dietary supplement or nootropic (cognitive enhancer). The bill aims to add tianeptine to the list of controlled substances, making it illegal to manufacture, possess, or sell without authorization. **Who It Affects:** The legislation would impact consumers who currently purchase tianeptine products, retailers and online sellers offering these products, and manufacturers distributing them. The bill also relates to concerns raised by public health officials, as tianeptine has potential for abuse and dependence, with some users reporting withdrawal symptoms similar to opioids. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S. 3797) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-Illinois) during the 119th Congress. No further action has been reported.
Cahokia Mounds Mississippian Culture Study Act
# Summary: Cahokia Mounds Mississippian Culture Study Act **What the bill would do:** This bill would direct the Department of the Interior to study whether three ancient Native American archaeological sites in the Collinsville, Illinois area should become part of the National Park System. The sites being studied are Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site, Emerald Mounds, and Pulcher Mounds—all linked to the Mississippian culture that flourished in North America centuries ago. The study would assess the national importance of these sites, evaluate whether they should become a national park unit, and explore other preservation options through state or local governments and nonprofits. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects residents of Illinois and visitors to the region, though it could have broader implications for how Native American cultural heritage is protected nationally. The sites themselves are already protected as state historic sites, but this study could lead to increased federal involvement, funding, and tourism. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by either chamber of Congress. It was introduced by Senator Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) in the 119th Congress.
ABODE Act
# ABODE Act Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a detailed summary because the information provided is quite limited. The bill details show only the basic metadata (bill number S 3768, sponsor Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois, current status in committee) but don't include the actual text, purpose statement, or specific provisions of the legislation. To give you an accurate plain-language summary covering what the bill does, who it affects, and key provisions, I would need access to the full bill text or its summary from Congress.gov or similar official sources. The acronym "ABODE" suggests the bill's subject matter, but I cannot reliably interpret what that stands for or the bill's intent without official documentation. **I'd recommend:** Visiting Congress.gov and searching "S 3768" to view the full bill text, summary, and any available committee reports that would allow for a proper explanation.
Foreign Medical School Accountability Fairness Act of 2026
# Foreign Medical School Accountability Fairness Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill, currently under review in the Senate, would establish new accountability standards and regulations for foreign medical schools whose graduates practice medicine in the United States. The exact provisions aren't detailed in the publicly available information, but the bill's title suggests it aims to create fairness and oversight mechanisms for international medical graduates entering the U.S. healthcare system. **Who It Affects:** The legislation would primarily impact foreign medical school graduates seeking to practice in America, as well as U.S. medical schools and patients. Foreign medical graduates currently make up a significant portion of the American physician workforce, particularly in rural and underserved areas. The bill could also affect medical schools abroad that send students to the U.S. and healthcare institutions that employ international doctors. **Current Status:** As of now, S 3757 remains in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. This means it's still in the early review stage and would need committee approval before moving to the full Senate floor for a vote.
Produce Prescriptions for Veterans Act
# Produce Prescriptions for Veterans Act (S 3706) — Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Produce Prescriptions for Veterans Act aims to improve veterans' access to fresh fruits and vegetables through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in available records, the title suggests it would create or expand a program allowing VA doctors to prescribe produce to veterans as part of their healthcare treatment, similar to nutrition-focused health initiatives in the civilian healthcare system. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily benefit veterans receiving care through the VA healthcare system. It could also impact VA medical facilities and potentially local farmers or food suppliers if the program includes partnerships for sourcing produce. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee review (S 3706, 119th Congress). This means it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was sponsored by Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-IL). For the most current information on whether this bill has progressed, you can check Congress.gov.
Nurse Faculty Shortage Reduction Act of 2026
# Nurse Faculty Shortage Reduction Act of 2026 - Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill aims to address a shortage of nursing instructors and professors in the United States. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically propose measures like loan forgiveness programs, scholarships, or grants to encourage nurses to become educators, and funding to support nursing education programs at colleges and universities. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect nursing students, nursing schools, hospitals, and healthcare facilities. By increasing the number of nursing instructors, the legislation could help expand nursing education programs, potentially increasing the supply of newly trained nurses entering the healthcare workforce. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 3707) is in committee review during the 119th Congress. This means it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-IL).
Dietary Supplement Listing Act of 2026
# Dietary Supplement Listing Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Dietary Supplement Listing Act of 2026 would require manufacturers of dietary supplements (vitamins, minerals, herbs, and similar products) to register and list their products with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Currently, dietary supplements don't need FDA approval before being sold, though manufacturers must report serious health problems to the agency. This bill would create a more formal registration system, giving the FDA advance notice of what supplements are on the market. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects dietary supplement manufacturers and distributors, who would need to comply with new registration requirements. Consumers may be indirectly affected if the requirements change product availability or pricing. The bill was introduced by Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) but hasn't progressed beyond the committee stage, meaning it hasn't been debated or voted on by the full Senate yet. **Current Status** As of now, this bill remains "in committee," meaning it's under review and hasn't moved forward in the legislative process. There's no indication of immediate action, and it may not advance further in the current Congress.
DEFIANCE Act of 2025
# DEFIANCE Act of 2025 Summary The DEFIANCE Act of 2025 is legislation designed to combat non-consensual intimate imagery (often called "deepfake pornography" or intimate image abuse) online. The bill would make it illegal to create, distribute, or possess sexually explicit images or videos of real people without their consent, including AI-generated or digitally altered images. It also addresses related harms like harassment, fraud, and identity theft connected to these images. The bill creates federal penalties for violations and allows victims to pursue civil lawsuits against those responsible. **Who It Affects:** The law would apply to anyone creating or sharing non-consensual intimate images online, while also protecting victims—particularly women, who are disproportionately targeted by this abuse. Tech platforms, law enforcement, and the courts would also be involved in enforcement. **Key Provisions:** The bill establishes federal criminal penalties for creating or distributing non-consensual intimate images, allows victims to sue perpetrators for damages, and requires reasonable efforts to remove such content from online platforms. It balances free speech protections with privacy rights. **Current Status:** The bill has passed the Senate and awaits consideration in the House of Representatives.
S.T.O.P. Illicit Vapes Act
# S.T.O.P. Illicit Vapes Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The S.T.O.P. Illicit Vapes Act aims to crack down on illegal vaping products entering the U.S. market. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the basic information available, the bill's title suggests it targets counterfeit, unlicensed, or otherwise prohibited vape products that bypass federal regulations. The legislation would likely strengthen enforcement mechanisms and penalties related to the illegal importation and sale of vaping devices. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect vape manufacturers, retailers, importers, and distributors—particularly those involved in illegal trade. It would also impact consumers by potentially reducing access to unregulated vaping products. The FDA and customs enforcement agencies would likely gain additional tools or resources to enforce existing regulations. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Sponsored by Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL), it remains in the early stages of the legislative process. For the most current information on amendments or movement, you would need to check Congress.gov or the Senate's official website.
A bill to amend section 3634 of title 18, United States Code, to extend the period for First Step Act reports.
# Summary of S 3484 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would extend the deadline for submitting reports required under the First Step Act, a 2018 criminal justice reform law. Specifically, it amends federal law to give the Department of Justice more time to complete and submit reports on the First Step Act's implementation and results. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects federal government agencies (particularly the Department of Justice) that are responsible for tracking and reporting on the First Step Act's progress. Indirectly, it may affect inmates in federal prisons, their families, and criminal justice advocates who rely on these reports to understand how the law is working. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee as of the 119th Congress and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) introduced the legislation. Without additional details about the specific deadline extension being proposed, this appears to be a technical adjustment to reporting requirements rather than a major policy change.
A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the consideration of acquitted conduct at sentencing.
# Summary of S 3483: Acquitted Conduct Sentencing Bill **What the bill would do:** This bill would prohibit federal judges from considering conduct that a defendant was acquitted of (found not guilty of) when deciding their sentence for crimes they were convicted of. Currently, judges can factor in acquitted conduct during sentencing, even if a jury found the defendant not guilty on those specific charges. The bill would change this practice by legally preventing judges from using acquitted conduct in sentencing decisions. **Who it affects and key provisions:** The bill would primarily affect federal defendants and the federal judicial system. It applies specifically to federal crimes and federal sentencing practices. The legislation is straightforward in its approach—it would amend federal criminal law to establish that only conduct a defendant was convicted of can be considered at sentencing, not conduct they were acquitted of. **Current status:** S 3483 is currently in committee and has not been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) in the 119th Congress. Bills in committee status typically undergo review and discussion before advancing to a full vote.
Safer Detention Act of 2025
# Safer Detention Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Safer Detention Act of 2025 is a proposed law that aims to improve safety conditions and oversight in detention facilities across the United States. While specific details about the bill's provisions are not available in the information provided, bills with this title typically focus on issues like reducing violence in jails and prisons, improving medical care for detainees, increasing accountability for facility staff, and establishing better monitoring systems to prevent abuse or unsafe conditions. **Who It Affects:** This bill would directly affect people held in federal, state, and local detention facilities, as well as the staff who work in these facilities. It could also impact detention facility budgets and operations, and may influence how law enforcement agencies manage their detention practices. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Richard Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois. Without access to the specific language of the bill, we cannot detail its exact provisions, so interested readers may want to check Congress.gov for the most current and detailed information.
First Step Implementation Act of 2025
# First Step Implementation Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would implement and expand upon the First Step Act, a criminal justice reform law passed in 2018. The specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, but the bill would likely focus on improving how federal prisons operate, expanding rehabilitation programs, and potentially adjusting sentencing practices. It would primarily affect federal prisoners and the federal prison system, though it could have broader implications for criminal justice policy. **Who It Affects:** The main groups affected would be incarcerated individuals in federal prisons and their families, federal prison staff, and the Bureau of Prisons. The changes could also influence how federal judges approach sentencing decisions going forward. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee (S 3482), meaning it's being reviewed but has not advanced to a full Senate vote. Senator Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) introduced it in the 119th Congress. Without additional details on specific provisions, it's difficult to assess the exact scope of changes being proposed. For more information about the bill's specific provisions, you would need to check Congress.gov or the bill's full text.
RISE from Trauma Act
# RISE from Trauma Act (S 3461) - Plain Language Summary This bill, introduced by Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois, aims to help people recover from trauma by expanding access to mental health treatment and support services. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on funding trauma-informed care programs, improving mental health resources, and supporting evidence-based treatments for conditions like PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder). **Who It Affects:** The bill would likely impact trauma survivors, mental health providers, and healthcare systems. It could affect veterans, survivors of violence, accident victims, and others dealing with trauma-related conditions. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full Senate vote. It's still in the early stages of the legislative process and would need committee approval and broader Senate support to move forward. *Note: Additional details about specific funding amounts, eligibility requirements, or program structures would be available in the full bill text.*
A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 1300 East Northwest Highway in Palatine, Illinois, as the "Bernie Bluestein Post Office Building".
# Summary of S 3444 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would officially rename the U.S. Postal Service facility located at 1300 East Northwest Highway in Palatine, Illinois. Instead of its current name, the building would be designated as the "Bernie Bluestein Post Office Building." This is a symbolic designation that honors Bernie Bluestein through naming the facility after him. **Who It Affects and Current Status:** The bill primarily affects the local Palatine, Illinois community and postal service operations at that location. It was introduced by Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-Illinois) in the 119th Congress. Currently, the bill is in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. Renaming bills like this one are relatively common in Congress and typically have bipartisan support when they move forward.
Medical Device Recall Improvement Act of 2025
# Medical Device Recall Improvement Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** The Medical Device Recall Improvement Act of 2025 would strengthen the process for recalling faulty or dangerous medical devices. It aims to improve how the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) identifies, tracks, and manages recalls of medical devices like pacemakers, insulin pumps, surgical tools, and diagnostic equipment. While the specific details aren't publicly detailed yet, recall improvement bills typically focus on making the process faster, more transparent, and better at notifying patients and healthcare providers when devices are unsafe. **Who it affects:** This bill would impact patients who use medical devices, hospitals and healthcare providers, manufacturers of medical devices, and the FDA. Patients could benefit from faster notification if their devices are recalled, while manufacturers would need to follow updated recall procedures. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Senator Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it's being reviewed before any vote. It has not yet advanced to the full Senate for consideration.