Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2]
Republican · TX · 22 bills sponsored
No Vigilante Checkpoints and Civil Rights Protection Act of 2026
# Summary: No Vigilante Checkpoints and Civil Rights Protection Act of 2026 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, sponsored by Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX), aims to prohibit private citizens or groups from setting up unauthorized checkpoints to stop, detain, or search people or vehicles. The legislation is designed to prevent vigilante enforcement activities and protect individuals' civil rights by making such unauthorized checkpoints illegal. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect private citizens and civilian groups attempting to conduct traffic stops, inspections, or detentions. It establishes legal protections against being stopped at unauthorized checkpoints by non-law enforcement personnel. The law would reserve checkpoint authority exclusively for authorized government officials like police and border patrol agents. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7572 is in the committee phase, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote by the House of Representatives. The bill remains in early legislative stages and would need committee approval and broader congressional support to move forward.
To amend chapter 55 of title 18, United States Code, to establish a criminal offense for the transportation of a minor for a gender transition procedure.
# Summary of HR 7420 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7420 would create a new federal crime making it illegal to transport a minor across state lines for the purpose of obtaining gender transition medical procedures. If passed, it would establish criminal penalties—potentially including fines and imprisonment—for anyone who transports a child to another state to access these procedures, presumably when such procedures are restricted or prohibited in the child's home state. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill would primarily affect minors seeking gender transition care, their parents or guardians, and medical providers. It would apply specifically to interstate transportation, meaning moving a child across state lines for these procedures. The bill does not specify which procedures would be covered or what criminal penalties would apply, as those details are not included in the summary provided. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7420 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was sponsored by Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX).
PROTECT the Grid Act
# PROTECT the Grid Act Summary The PROTECT the Grid Act (HR 7208) is a bill introduced by Rep. Dan Crenshaw that aims to strengthen the security and resilience of the United States electrical grid against physical and cyber attacks. While specific details aren't provided in the information available, bills with this title typically focus on measures like improving infrastructure hardening, increasing penalties for attacks on grid infrastructure, enhancing coordination between government and utility companies, and strengthening cybersecurity standards for power systems. This bill would primarily affect electricity providers, grid operators, and potentially the broader public by making the power system more resistant to intentional damage or sabotage. It could also impact regulated utilities through new compliance requirements or security standards they would need to implement. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet advanced to a full House floor vote for consideration. *Note: For complete details on specific provisions, penalties, funding, or implementation mechanisms, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov, as summary information is limited.*
Do No Harm in Medicaid Act
# Do No Harm in Medicaid Act - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The bill would prohibit the federal government from paying for gender transition procedures for minors (people under 18) through Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income individuals. It defines these procedures as medical treatments intended to change someone's body to match a different gender identity, including certain surgeries, implants, and hormone medications. The bill does allow exceptions for procedures that treat early puberty, genetic disorders, chromosomal abnormalities, reverse previous gender transition procedures, or prevent serious harm or death—provided a parent or legal guardian consents. **Who It Affects:** This primarily affects minors from low-income families who rely on Medicaid for healthcare coverage and whose doctors might otherwise recommend gender transition treatments. It also affects healthcare providers, Medicaid administrators, and states that administer Medicaid programs. **Current Status:** The bill has passed the U.S. House of Representatives and is pending action in the Senate. It is a partisan measure, with Republican support and Democratic opposition, reflecting broader disagreement over medical treatment policies for transgender youth.
Recycling Technology Innovation Act
# Recycling Technology Innovation Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Recycling Technology Innovation Act (HR 6566) would support the development and deployment of new recycling technologies. While specific details aren't available in the provided summary, bills with this title typically aim to promote innovation in how materials are recycled, potentially through funding research, removing regulatory barriers, or providing incentives for companies to develop advanced recycling equipment and methods. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect recycling companies, technology developers, manufacturers, and potentially consumers. It could also influence environmental policy and waste management systems at local and state levels. Businesses in the waste management and materials recovery sectors would likely be key stakeholders. **Current Status** As of the information provided, HR 6566 remains in committee review, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) in the 119th Congress. To learn more about its specific provisions and current progress, you can check Congress.gov or the sponsor's official website.
FISH Act of 2025
# FISH Act of 2025 Summary The FISH Act of 2025 (HR 3756) is a bill currently under review in Congress that addresses fisheries management, marine resources, and related trade and technology issues. Based on its listed subjects, the bill would likely establish or modify policies related to fishing industry oversight, international seafood trade, marine conservation, and waterway management. It appears to involve coordination between the Department of Commerce and international partners, and may include provisions regarding sanctions, visa policies, and the use of advanced technology in fisheries monitoring and enforcement. The bill would affect commercial and recreational fishing industries, seafood consumers, coastal communities that depend on fishing economies, and federal agencies responsible for marine resource management. It could also impact international trade relationships with countries involved in fishing and seafood production. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been assigned to the relevant congressional committee for review and discussion but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Without access to the bill's full text, more specific details about exact provisions cannot be determined. Interested parties can track its progress through Congress.gov.
Primacy Certainty Act of 2025
# Primacy Certainty Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Primacy Certainty Act of 2025 (HR 4880) is currently in committee and has not yet been formally described in publicly available legislative summaries. Without access to the bill's specific language or detailed summary, I cannot accurately describe its provisions or intended effects. **Status and Next Steps:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) but remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Bills at this stage often undergo revisions and may not advance further. **What You Should Know:** To get accurate information about this bill's specific provisions and who it would affect, I'd recommend checking official sources like Congress.gov, where you can read the full text once it's available, or contacting Representative Crenshaw's office directly. This will ensure you have factual details about what the legislation actually proposes.
To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the inclusion of a biological attribution strategy, and an early warning strategy and implementation plan, in the National Health Security Strategy, and for other purposes.
# HR 4165 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 4165 would require the federal government to develop and include two new strategies in the National Health Security Strategy (the government's overall plan for protecting public health): a "biological attribution strategy" and an "early warning strategy with implementation plan." In simpler terms, this means the government would need to create formal plans for identifying the sources of biological threats (like disease outbreaks or bioweapons) and for detecting such threats early before they spread widely. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily affect federal health agencies, particularly the Department of Health and Human Services, which would be responsible for developing these strategies. It could indirectly impact the general public by potentially improving the government's ability to respond to biological threats. The bill was introduced by Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill's specific details beyond these main provisions are not yet publicly detailed.
Returning Illegals over Turmoil Act
# Summary of HR 3859: Returning Illegals over Turmoil Act **What the Bill Would Do:** HR 3859, sponsored by Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX), is currently under review in committee and has not yet been formally detailed in available legislative summaries. Based on its title, the bill appears intended to address immigration enforcement and deportation procedures, though specific provisions are not yet publicly documented in standard legislative databases. **Current Status:** The bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full House vote. Without access to the bill's detailed text or committee analysis, a comprehensive breakdown of its specific provisions, affected populations, and implementation mechanisms cannot be provided at this time. **Note:** For accurate details about this bill's specific provisions, affected groups, and exact requirements, I'd recommend checking Congress.gov or the House Clerk's website directly, where the full legislative text will be available once formally introduced and processed.
Protect DSH Act
# Protect DSH Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Protect DSH Act (HR 3581) is a proposed law designed to protect Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments under Medicare and Medicaid. DSH payments are additional federal funds given to hospitals that serve a large number of low-income patients and uninsured individuals. This bill would likely prevent or limit reductions to these payments that were scheduled under previous healthcare legislation. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects hospitals, especially those in rural and urban areas that treat many uninsured and low-income patients. It also indirectly affects Medicaid and Medicare programs, which fund these payments, and ultimately impacts patients who rely on these hospitals for care. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3581 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) and remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Public Safety Officer Concussion and Traumatic Brain Injury Health Act of 2025
# Public Safety Officer Concussion and Traumatic Brain Injury Health Act of 2025 **What the Bill Does** This bill would establish health protections and support for public safety officers—including police officers, firefighters, and emergency responders—who suffer concussions and traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) in the line of duty. The legislation aims to improve medical screening, treatment access, and long-term health monitoring for these injuries, which can have serious long-term effects on cognitive function, mental health, and quality of life. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill directly affects law enforcement, firefighting, and emergency response personnel across the country. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, such bills typically address issues like requiring baseline neurological testing, ensuring access to specialized medical care for TBI treatment, establishing protocols for reporting and documenting these injuries, and potentially providing support services for recovery. The bill recognizes that repeated head impacts—common in police and firefighting work—can accumulate to cause serious health problems. **Current Status** HR 2830 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX).
Children’s Hospital GME Support Reauthorization Act of 2025
# Children's Hospital GME Support Reauthorization Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would reauthorize federal funding support for graduate medical education (GME) programs at children's hospitals. GME programs train doctors in specialized medical fields through hands-on experience after medical school. The bill aims to continue or renew existing federal financial support that helps children's hospitals maintain these training programs. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects children's hospitals across the country and the medical residents and fellows who train there. Indirectly, it impacts families and patients who receive care from doctors trained through these programs. Medical professionals and hospital administrators in pediatric care would be key stakeholders. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. No additional legislative details or specific funding amounts are currently available in the bill information provided.
Medicaid Primary Care Improvement Act
# Medicaid Primary Care Improvement Act Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would allow state Medicaid programs to use "direct primary care" arrangements, where doctors receive a fixed monthly or annual fee from the government for providing primary care services to Medicaid patients, rather than being paid per visit. The federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services would be required to hold virtual meetings with stakeholders to provide guidance on how states could implement this model, and to study how well it works in terms of quality and cost. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Medicaid patients (low-income individuals and families), primary care doctors who accept Medicaid, and state Medicaid programs. It could also influence how Medicaid managed care organizations (private insurance companies that handle Medicaid) structure their payments to doctors. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX).
Jobs and Opportunities for Medicaid Act
# Jobs and Opportunities for Medicaid Act (HR 1059) - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would require able-bodied adults between ages 18-65 to work or volunteer at least 20 hours per week to receive Medicaid health coverage. People would be exempt from this requirement if they have medical conditions preventing work, are caregivers for children or disabled family members, or meet other specified exceptions. **Who it affects:** The requirement would primarily impact working-age Medicaid recipients without disabilities or caregiving responsibilities. It would not affect current Medicaid recipients who are seniors, children, disabled individuals, or those with qualifying exemptions. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. No action has been taken on it at this time.
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of higher education from requiring ideological oaths or similar statements, and for other purposes.
# HR 927 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 927 would prohibit colleges and universities that receive federal student aid funding from requiring students, employees, contractors, or applicants to sign statements endorsing or opposing specific ideologies. Specifically, it targets requirements related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives—prohibiting institutions from compelling people to endorse ideologies promoting differential treatment based on race, ethnicity, or color. The bill also prevents schools from giving preferential treatment to students or employees based on their voluntary support for such ideologies. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would impact virtually all colleges and universities accepting federal aid, along with their students, faculty, staff, and job applicants. It's currently in committee (not yet voted on by the full House), having been introduced by Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX). **Key Context** The bill reflects ongoing debates about campus speech and DEI programs. Supporters argue it protects intellectual freedom and prevents ideological conformity requirements, while critics contend it could undermine anti-discrimination policies and diversity efforts. The bill's practical impact would depend on how broadly courts interpret "ideological oaths" and which existing institutional practices it would actually prohibit.
ATF Accountability Act of 2025
# ATF Accountability Act of 2025 - Summary **What it does:** This bill would create a formal legal process that allows gun dealers, importers, and manufacturers to challenge decisions made by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Currently, these businesses have limited ways to appeal ATF rulings. The bill would establish clearer procedures for how these appeals work and what rights these businesses have in the process. **Who it affects:** The primary beneficiaries would be licensed gun dealers, importers, and manufacturers who disagree with ATF decisions—such as licensing denials or regulatory determinations. It could also indirectly affect gun owners and the general public, depending on how the appeal process influences ATF enforcement. **Current status:** The bill is still in committee review (HR 607 in the 119th Congress), meaning it hasn't been voted on by the full House yet. It was introduced by Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX).
Medicaid Third Party Liability Act
# Medicaid Third Party Liability Act - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change how Medicaid handles payment responsibilities when a patient has other insurance coverage. Currently, Medicaid must pay first for two categories of services: preventive pediatric care (like checkups and vaccines for children) and services for people whose child support is being enforced. The bill would eliminate these exceptions, meaning that other insurance companies would be required to pay first in these situations, and Medicaid would only pay afterward. The bill also strengthens requirements for states to collect and verify information about patients' other insurance before providing Medicaid coverage. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill primarily affects Medicaid beneficiaries (low-income individuals and families), children receiving preventive care, families involved in child support enforcement, and state Medicaid programs. The main provisions would: (1) remove the special rules that currently allow Medicaid to pay first for pediatric preventive care, (2) change the payment order for services related to child support enforcement cases, and (3) deny federal Medicaid funding for services if states fail to obtain and verify third-party insurance information beforehand. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee (as of the 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House.
State Border Security Reimbursement Act of 2025
# State Border Security Reimbursement Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require the federal government to reimburse states for money they've spent on border security activities. Any state that has spent more than $2.5 billion on border security and enforcement over the past 10 years would be eligible to receive reimbursement for those costs. States would need to submit detailed records of their border security expenses (excluding any costs already covered by federal funding) by a deadline set in the bill to receive the reimbursement. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects states with significant border security expenses, particularly border states like Texas, Arizona, California, and New Mexico. It would also impact the federal budget, as the government would need to allocate funds for these reimbursements. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 424) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To acknowledge the courage and sacrifice of veterans of the Vietnam war and formally apologize for the treatment they received upon returning home.
# Summary of HJRES 19 **What the Bill Does** This joint resolution would formally recognize Vietnam War veterans for their sacrifice and urge the President to issue an official apology for the mistreatment many received when they returned home from the war. The bill also calls for increased education efforts to better teach Americans about Vietnam veterans' experiences and the challenges they faced after the war. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Vietnam War veterans and their families, who would receive formal acknowledgment of their service and the difficulties they experienced. It also affects schools and educational institutions, which the bill encourages to improve how they teach about the Vietnam War and veterans' experiences. **Current Status and Key Details** Introduced by Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), the bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. A joint resolution is a formal statement of Congress and expresses the sense of Congress on an issue; if passed, it would not create new laws or programs but would represent an official congressional position and urge presidential action.
Broadband Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act
# Broadband Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act (HR 339) Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would streamline the process for upgrading telecommunications infrastructure by setting faster approval timelines for wireless tower and base station modifications. Specifically, it would require states and local governments to approve requests to modify existing towers within 60 days if the changes don't significantly alter the structure's physical size (such as adding or replacing transmission equipment). If a state or locality doesn't respond within the timeframe, the request would be automatically approved. The bill also requires clear written explanations if a request is rejected and establishes procedures for handling incomplete applications. **Who it affects:** This bill primarily affects telecommunications companies and internet service providers seeking to upgrade their networks, as well as state and local governments responsible for reviewing these requests. Indirectly, it could impact broadband availability and service quality for consumers, since faster equipment upgrades may lead to improved connectivity and network resilience. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
The HCT/P Modernization Act of 2025
# HCT/P Modernization Act of 2025 Summary **What It Does:** This bill asks the FDA to improve how it communicates with and educates the public and medical professionals about human cell and tissue products—materials used in medical treatments that contain human cells or tissues. The bill requires the FDA to hold educational workshops, create a public comment system, and publish guidance materials to help stakeholders understand the current regulations and best practices for these products. **Who It Affects:** The bill impacts medical researchers, healthcare companies, doctors, patients who may receive cell and tissue treatments, and the general public. It's designed to make FDA information more accessible and transparent for anyone involved in or affected by cell and tissue-based medical products. **Key Provisions:** The FDA must conduct workshops to discuss advancing the science behind these products, establish an online public comment system, publish educational materials about the FDA's "Tissue Reference Group" (an advisory body), and submit a report to Congress with recommendations on how to better regulate these products. These activities must continue for at least three years. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of review and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Preventing Unjust Red Flag Laws Act of 2025
# Preventing Unjust Red Flag Laws Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would block the federal government from spending money to support "red flag" laws—state or local laws that allow authorities to temporarily remove firearms from people deemed to pose a risk to themselves or others. The bill specifically targets these laws because it defines them as allowing firearm removal "without due process," meaning without the full legal procedures typically required before government action. **Who it affects:** The bill would impact states and localities that have red flag laws or are considering implementing them, as they would lose federal funding for these programs. It would also affect gun owners in those jurisdictions, as well as law enforcement and courts involved in executing these orders. Currently, about 21 states plus Washington, D.C. have some form of red flag law. **Current status and key point:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The main point of controversy is the characterization of due process—supporters of red flag laws argue they include legal hearings and procedures, while this bill's language suggests otherwise. This disagreement reflects a broader debate about balancing public safety concerns with Second Amendment and due process protections.