Curtis, John R. [R-UT]
Republican · UT · 32 bills sponsored
A bill to establish a commission on fiscal responsibility and reform.
# Summary of S. 4012: Fiscal Responsibility and Reform Commission **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would create a new commission tasked with studying and recommending solutions to address the federal government's long-term fiscal challenges, particularly related to spending, revenue, and the national debt. The commission would examine current budget practices and propose reforms to improve the government's financial sustainability. If passed, it would establish the structure, membership, and duties of this commission but would not automatically implement any changes—it would simply produce recommendations for Congress to consider. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects policymakers and the federal government's approach to budgeting. More broadly, any recommendations from the commission could eventually influence federal spending, taxes, or entitlement programs, which would have downstream effects on American taxpayers and beneficiaries of federal programs. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet scheduled for a full vote in the Senate. It has not advanced to further stages of the legislative process.
A bill to amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Bonneville Shoreline Trail.
# Summary of S. 1135: Bonneville Shoreline Trail Study **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would direct the U.S. Department of the Interior to study whether the Bonneville Shoreline Trail in Utah could be officially designated as part of the National Trails System. The National Trails System is a federal program that recognizes and supports significant hiking and recreation trails across the country. If the study determines the trail is suitable, it could eventually receive federal designation and support. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects Utah residents and outdoor enthusiasts who use the Bonneville Shoreline Trail, a hiking trail that follows the ancient shoreline of prehistoric Lake Bonneville around the Salt Lake Valley area. The legislation would also involve the Department of the Interior in evaluating the trail's historical significance, recreational value, and feasibility for inclusion in the federal system. No significant costs or controversial provisions are apparent from the bill's description. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S. 1135) remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full vote in the Senate. It was sponsored by Senator John Curtis, a Republican from Utah.
A bill to amend the Public Health Service Act to provide community-based training opportunities for medical students in rural areas and medically underserved communities, and for other purposes.
# Bill Summary: Rural and Underserved Community Medical Training Act **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would create new training opportunities for medical students in rural areas and medically underserved communities. By amending the Public Health Service Act, it aims to give future doctors hands-on experience in places that typically struggle to attract healthcare providers. The bill is intended to help address doctor shortages in these regions and encourage medical graduates to practice in areas where patients have limited access to care. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily benefit medical students, rural residents, and people in underserved urban communities with limited healthcare access. It could also impact medical schools, training programs, and healthcare providers in these regions. The bill may indirectly affect the broader healthcare system by potentially increasing the supply of doctors willing to work in areas with high need. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S. 3989) is pending in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. Sponsored by Senator John Curtis (R-UT), it remains in the early stages of the legislative process with no specific provisions detailed in available public records.
A bill to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide overtime compensation exceptions to employers of emergency medical technicians and paramedics in rural areas.
# Summary of S 3963 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would modify federal overtime pay rules for emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and paramedics who work in rural areas. Currently, federal law requires employers to pay workers overtime pay (typically time-and-a-half) when they work more than 40 hours per week. If passed, this bill would create an exception that would allow rural employers of EMTs and paramedics to avoid paying overtime compensation under certain circumstances. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects rural ambulance services, fire departments, and other emergency medical providers in sparsely populated areas. It would also impact EMTs and paramedics employed in these regions, as they could potentially work longer hours without receiving overtime pay. Rural communities and patients relying on these emergency services could also be indirectly affected. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No action has been taken on it at this time.
Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2025
# Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2025 appears to address forestry, licensing, and national symbol matters related to Utah, though the specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information. Based on its subjects, it likely involves regulations around forest management, tree harvesting, or related licensing requirements, possibly with connection to Utah's national forests or lands of symbolic significance. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect Utah residents, forest management agencies, timber companies, and others involved in forestry operations in Utah. Depending on its specific provisions, it could also impact federal land management policies if it pertains to national forests or protected areas. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 2417) is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator John Curtis (R-UT). Without access to the full legislative text, the exact details of the proposed changes cannot be confirmed. Interested parties can track its progress through Congress.gov for updates as the bill moves through the legislative process.
Critical Undersea Infrastructure Resilience Initiative Act
# Critical Undersea Infrastructure Resilience Initiative Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Critical Undersea Infrastructure Resilience Initiative Act would establish protections and policies for underwater infrastructure that's critical to the U.S. economy and national security. This includes submarine cables that carry internet and telecommunications data across oceans, as well as other undersea pipelines and systems. The bill aims to make this infrastructure more resilient against damage, accidents, and potential threats. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would impact telecommunications companies, energy companies, government agencies responsible for national security, and ultimately the general public that depends on reliable internet and energy services. While specific provisions aren't detailed in available information, resilience initiatives typically address issues like coordinating with international partners to protect cables, improving monitoring systems, and establishing response protocols when damage occurs. The bill is being sponsored by Senator John Curtis (R-UT). **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it's in the early review stage of the legislative process. It has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill would need to clear committee review, pass a Senate vote, move through the House, and receive presidential approval to become law.
ePermit Act
# ePermit Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The ePermit Act would establish a digital permitting system for federal land use permits and authorizations. Rather than requiring applicants to submit paper-based permit applications to federal agencies, this bill would create standardized electronic filing processes. This is intended to streamline how people and businesses obtain permits for activities on federal lands—such as mining, logging, recreation, or energy development. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would impact anyone needing federal permits, including businesses, outdoor recreation companies, energy developers, and individual landowners. By digitizing the permitting process, the bill aims to reduce paperwork, speed up application processing times, and lower compliance costs. The legislation would require federal agencies managing public lands (like the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management) to adopt compatible electronic systems. **Current Status** The ePermit Act is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. As a proposal in the early legislative stage, it has not become law.
Moab UMTRA Project Transition Act of 2025
# Moab UMTRA Project Transition Act of 2025 — Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would allow the Department of Energy to give the Moab uranium site to Grand County, Utah for free once cleanup of radioactive waste is complete. The Moab site, located near Moab, Utah, contains uranium mill tailings (radioactive waste left over from uranium milling operations). The bill requires that the county keep the land and cannot sell or transfer it to private companies or nonprofit organizations. **Who It Affects & Key Details:** The bill primarily affects Grand County, Utah, and the Department of Energy. DOE would keep control of any water rights and wells needed to continue monitoring and cleaning groundwater at the site, even after transferring the land. This ensures the federal government can maintain responsibility for any ongoing environmental remediation work. The land transfer only happens after cleanup is finished. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator John Curtis (R-Utah) in the 119th Congress.
Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act
# Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act Summary **What the bill does:** This legislation would transfer certain legal authority from federal courts to Utah state courts. Specifically, it would allow Utah courts to handle civil lawsuits (non-criminal cases) involving the Shivwits Band of Paiutes tribe and disputes over their trust lands in southwestern Utah. The bill also grants the tribe the ability to lease its federally-held land, which it cannot currently do. **Who it affects:** The primary parties affected are the Shivwits Band of Paiutes (a Native American tribe in Utah), the State of Utah, and any businesses or individuals who have contracts or legal disputes with the tribe. The change would shift decision-making power from the federal court system to state courts. **Current status:** The bill (S. 1508) is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator John Curtis (R-Utah).
Timeshare Transparency Act
# Timeshare Transparency Act Summary **What It Would Do** The Timeshare Transparency Act aims to increase disclosure and transparency requirements for timeshare companies. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically require timeshare sellers to provide clearer, more complete information to consumers before they purchase—such as details about fees, cancellation policies, and long-term costs. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily impact timeshare companies and the millions of Americans who own or are considering purchasing timeshares. Consumer protection advocates argue current sales practices can be misleading, so this legislation targets strengthening protections for potential buyers. **Current Status** The bill (S 3502) is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator John Curtis (R-UT). Like most bills in committee, it would need committee approval before advancing for a full Senate vote. *Note: Complete bill text would provide specific provisions and requirements.*
Ally’s Act
# Ally's Act Summary I appreciate the request, but I'm unable to provide a detailed summary because the bill information provided is quite limited. The data shows this is Senate Bill 3400 from the 119th Congress, sponsored by Rep. John Curtis (R-UT), and that it's currently in committee, but it doesn't include the bill's actual text, purpose statement, or key provisions. To give you an accurate, factual summary about what the bill would do, who it affects, and its specific provisions, I would need access to the bill's legislative text or official summary. I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** (search "S 3400") for the full bill text and Congressional Research Service summary - The **sponsor's official website** for their description of the bill's purpose - Recent **news coverage** if the bill has received media attention This will ensure you get accurate information about what Ally's Act actually proposes rather than a potentially incomplete or inaccurate summary based on limited data.
Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2025
# Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2025 would establish a refined fuel reserve for the western United States. While specific details about the reserve's size, location, and operational structure aren't provided in the available information, the bill appears designed to create a strategic stockpile of refined fuels (such as gasoline and diesel) in the western region, similar to how the federal government maintains the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would potentially affect fuel prices, energy security, and emergency preparedness in western states, as well as fuel producers and refineries involved in the program. It could also impact federal budgets dedicated to maintaining such a reserve. Currently, the bill is in the committee review stage, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. As introduced by Sen. John Curtis (R-UT), it remains in early legislative proceedings.
A bill to direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Highland City, Utah.
# Summary of S. 3338 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require the United States Postal Service (USPS) to assign Highland City, Utah its own distinct ZIP code. Currently, Highland City likely shares a ZIP code with another nearby community, and this legislation would establish a separate postal designation exclusively for that city. **Who It Affects:** The primary beneficiaries would be Highland City residents and businesses, who would gain a unique mailing address identifier. This could improve mail delivery efficiency and help establish a clearer municipal identity for the city. **Current Status:** S. 3338 was introduced by Senator John Curtis (R-Utah) during the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill has not progressed beyond the initial committee stage.
Six Assurances to Taiwan Act
# Six Assurances to Taiwan Act - Summary **What the Bill Does** The Six Assurances to Taiwan Act would formally recognize and reinforce six commitments the U.S. made to Taiwan regarding its relationship with China. These assurances—made through diplomatic channels over the decades—include promises that the U.S. would not pressure Taiwan to negotiate with China, would not set a deadline for unification, would not mediate between Taiwan and China, would not alter its stance on Taiwan's status, would not revise the Taiwan Relations Act, and would continue arms sales to Taiwan. By passing this bill, Congress would officially codify these longstanding assurances into law. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This legislation would primarily affect U.S.-Taiwan relations and indirectly impacts China's interests in the region. It reassures Taiwan of continued American support and commitment. The bill has no direct domestic impact on U.S. citizens but reflects Congress's intent to maintain a strong relationship with Taiwan, a self-governing democratic island that China claims as its own. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative John Curtis (R-UT) but remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate or House.
Algorithm Accountability Act
# Algorithm Accountability Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Algorithm Accountability Act would require companies to be more transparent and accountable for how their algorithms work. Algorithms are the computerized systems that decide what content you see on social media, what products get recommended to you online, and other automated decisions. This bill would likely mandate that companies disclose how their algorithms function, allow for independent audits of these systems, and take responsibility if their algorithms cause harm or discrimination. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact large technology companies that use algorithms to make decisions affecting millions of users—think social media platforms, search engines, and e-commerce sites. It could also affect consumers and workers who are subject to algorithmic decisions, as well as regulators tasked with oversight. The requirements would likely apply mainly to larger companies rather than small businesses. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It has not advanced to a floor vote and would need committee approval before progressing further in the legislative process.
Fusion Advanced Manufacturing Parity Act
# Fusion Advanced Manufacturing Parity Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Fusion Advanced Manufacturing Parity Act aims to support the development of fusion energy technology in the United States by promoting advanced manufacturing capabilities. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill's title suggests it would work to create equal footing or "parity" between fusion energy manufacturing and other energy sector manufacturing—likely through regulatory changes, tax incentives, or federal support that gives fusion companies comparable advantages to traditional energy manufacturers. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect fusion energy companies and manufacturers working on next-generation nuclear fusion technology, as well as the broader clean energy sector. It could also impact workers in manufacturing and energy industries, and indirectly affect consumers through potential changes to energy production and pricing. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet advanced to a full floor vote. As of now, it remains in the early stages of the legislative process and would require committee approval and broader congressional support to move forward.
Fix Our Forests Act
# Fix Our Forests Act Summary The Fix Our Forests Act (S 1462) is a bill sponsored by Senator John Curtis (R-UT) that aims to improve forest management and reduce wildfire risks. While the specific details aren't provided, the bill's subject matter suggests it would address forest health, wildfire prevention, and emergency response through updated management practices, technology use, and coordination between the Department of Agriculture and Department of the Interior—the agencies responsible for managing federal forests. The bill would affect federal land managers, communities near national forests, first responders dealing with wildfires, and potentially federal employees in forestry-related positions. It likely includes provisions related to environmental monitoring, funding structures for forest management agencies, and possibly new tools or technologies for fire prevention and response. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full floor vote in the Senate. This is an early stage in the legislative process. *Note: For a more detailed analysis of specific provisions, you would need to review the full bill text, which would contain the exact proposed changes to forest management policy.*
Wildfire Emissions Prevention Act of 2025
# Wildfire Emissions Prevention Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Wildfire Emissions Prevention Act of 2025 aims to reduce air pollution and emissions caused by wildfires through prevention and forest management strategies. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on allowing controlled burns, thinning overgrown forests, and other land management practices to reduce the intensity and frequency of large wildfires—which are major sources of air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect federal and state forest management agencies, environmental regulations, and communities in wildfire-prone areas. It could also impact air quality nationwide, as wildfires contribute significantly to regional and national air pollution. Rural communities and forestry-related industries may be involved in implementing new management practices. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 3044) is in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. Sponsor Senator John Curtis (R-UT) introduced it during the 119th Congress. To learn more about the specific provisions and the bill's progress, you can check Congress.gov for the full text and any committee activities.
Consumer Safety Technology Act
# Consumer Safety Technology Act (S 2766) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Consumer Safety Technology Act aims to modernize how consumer product safety is regulated in the United States. While specific details are limited in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on updating the processes and tools used by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to identify, track, and respond to unsafe products in the marketplace. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact consumers, product manufacturers, and the CPSC. It may also affect retailers and online marketplaces that sell consumer goods, as they could face new reporting or compliance requirements. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. Without moving out of committee and passing both chambers of Congress, the bill cannot become law. As of now, it remains in the early stages of the legislative process. *Note: Detailed provisions are not publicly specified in the available bill summary. For comprehensive information, you can review the full text on Congress.gov.*
Modern Risk Detection Act of 2025
# Modern Risk Detection Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Modern Risk Detection Act of 2025 (S 2660) is a Senate bill currently under review in committee. Based on its title, the bill appears designed to update or modernize how risks are identified and detected, though specific details about the exact provisions are not provided in the available information. **Who It Affects and Current Status** Without access to the bill's full text, the precise scope of who would be affected—whether it's government agencies, businesses, or the general public—cannot be definitively stated. The bill was introduced by Senator John R. Curtis (R-Utah) and remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. At this stage, it is still in the early phases of the legislative process. **Note**: To understand the specific provisions and potential impact of this bill, you would need to review the full legislative text available on Congress.gov or consult the bill's official summary once more detailed information becomes publicly available.
A bill to allow for the use of risk-based inspections for in-service breakout tanks.
# S. 2661 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would allow companies to use "risk-based inspections" instead of the current standard inspection methods for in-service breakout tanks—large storage tanks used in oil and gas operations. Risk-based inspections would let companies prioritize inspections based on potential hazards rather than following a fixed inspection schedule. The goal is to create a more flexible regulatory approach that could reduce unnecessary inspections while focusing resources on tanks with the highest safety risks. **Who It Affects** The primary beneficiaries would be oil and gas companies that operate these storage tanks, as they may reduce inspection costs and administrative burdens. Regulators and workers in the industry could also be affected. The bill's impact on public safety and environmental protection depends on whether risk-based inspections are as effective as current inspection methods. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator John R. Curtis (R-Utah) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Review of Final Rule Reclassification of Major Sources as Area Sources Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act".
# Summary of SJRES 31 **What the Bill Does:** This bill cancels an EPA rule that was issued in September 2024 regarding how certain air pollution sources are classified under the Clean Air Act. Specifically, the rule required industrial facilities that emit persistent and bioaccumulative hazardous air pollutants (chemicals that accumulate in the environment and in living organisms) to continue following strict emission standards even if they downgrade their classification from "major sources" to "area sources." By passing this resolution, Congress rejected that EPA rule and prevented it from taking effect. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects industrial facilities and manufacturers that emit hazardous air pollutants. It also impacts environmental protection efforts and air quality standards. The rule being canceled would have applied to sources of toxic air pollutants like mercury and other persistent chemicals. **Current Status:** The bill has been signed into law, meaning it has been approved by Congress and the President. This is one of several recent congressional efforts to overturn or disapprove of EPA regulations through a legislative process that allows Congress to nullify agency rules.
Alex Gate Safety Act of 2025
# Alex Gate Safety Act of 2025 - Summary Unfortunately, I cannot provide a detailed summary of this bill because the information available is limited. The congressional record shows only basic details: it's a Senate bill (S. 1682) from the 119th Congress, sponsored by Republican Senator John Curtis of Utah, and it's currently in committee review. The bill's specific subjects aren't listed in the publicly available data I can access. To get accurate information about what this bill would actually do, I'd recommend checking **Congress.gov** directly, where you can find the full text, a summary of provisions, and any recent updates on its status. This will show you the specific goals, who would be affected, and any recent committee actions.
Uyghur Policy Act of 2025
# Uyghur Policy Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Uyghur Policy Act of 2025 is a proposed law focused on U.S. policy toward the Uyghur population in China's Xinjiang region. While specific details aren't fully listed in the available information, bills with this title typically address concerns about alleged human rights issues affecting Uyghurs and aim to shape how the U.S. government responds to the situation. This could include measures related to trade, sanctions, humanitarian assistance, or diplomatic actions. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect U.S.-China relations and policies toward Xinjiang. It may impact American companies doing business in or with the region, as well as Uyghur communities both in China and abroad. The bill could also influence broader U.S. foreign policy and international human rights advocacy. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S 1542) is in committee, meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process. It was introduced by Senator John Curtis (R-UT) in the 119th Congress and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill would need to pass committee review, full Senate approval, and House approval before becoming law.