Comer, James [R-KY-1]
Republican · KY · 6 bills sponsored
To remove restrictions from a parcel of land in Paducah, Kentucky.
# HR 1276 Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would remove legal restrictions from a 3.62-acre parcel of land in Paducah, Kentucky, currently part of the Paducah Memorial Army Reserve Center. The restrictions—including easements and conditions—were originally placed on the property when the Department of the Interior transferred it to the City of Paducah in 2012. If passed, these deed restrictions would be completely removed, giving the city greater flexibility in how it uses the land. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects the City of Paducah and the Department of the Interior. By removing restrictions, it would allow the city to develop or repurpose the land more freely than current deed conditions permit. The change could impact any future plans the city has for the property. **Current Status** The bill has already passed the House of Representatives and is now awaiting action in the Senate. It is sponsored by Rep. James Comer (R-KY).
Reorganizing Government Act of 2025
# Reorganizing Government Act of 2025: Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would revive an expired presidential power to reorganize federal agencies with expedited (faster) congressional approval. Currently, presidents can propose reorganization plans, but Congress must follow standard procedures to approve or reject them. This bill would bring back a streamlined process where Congress would have a limited time to vote on these plans, making it easier for the President to restructure government agencies. The bill would also expand what reorganizations are allowed—currently there are restrictions on eliminating entire departments or regulatory agencies, but this bill would remove those restrictions. **Key Changes and Who It Affects** The bill would allow the President to pursue reorganization plans specifically aimed at reducing the number of federal employees, cutting regulations, and eliminating government programs the President deems unnecessary. This affects federal workers, who could see job losses or restructuring, and the general public, whose access to government services could change depending on which programs are eliminated. The bill does not specify which agencies or programs would be affected—that would be up to the President. The expedited process means Congress would have less time to debate and analyze the impacts. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee (HR 1295), meaning it has been referred to a House committee for review but has not yet been voted on by the full House or Senate.
MARINA Act
# MARINA Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 7248 (the MARINA Act) from the 119th Congress, so I cannot provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 7248" to see the full text, summary, and status - **House Clerk's website** - For committee assignments and legislative history - **Your representative's office** - They can explain how it affects your district If you can share the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
Save Local Business Act
# Save Local Business Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The Save Local Business Act would change how federal labor law defines "joint employers." Currently, companies can sometimes be held responsible for labor practices at other businesses they work with or control (like franchises or subcontractors). This bill would make that standard stricter by requiring that a company only be considered a joint employer if it directly controls major employment decisions—such as hiring, firing, setting pay, supervising day-to-day work, scheduling shifts, or disciplining employees. Without this direct control, companies couldn't be held liable for labor violations at related businesses. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects franchise businesses, staffing agencies, and companies that contract with other businesses. Supporters argue it protects small business owners and franchisees from unexpected liability. Labor advocates worry it could weaken worker protections by making it harder to hold large corporations accountable for poor working conditions at companies they have influence over but don't directly manage. **Current Status** The bill passed the House of Representatives. It now awaits consideration in the Senate, where its fate is uncertain. The outcome may depend on which party controls the chamber and their stance on labor regulations.
GOOD Act
# GOOD Act Summary **What It Does:** The GOOD Act (Guidance Out Of Darkness Act) would require federal agencies to make their guidance documents more transparent and accessible to the public. Specifically, agencies would have to post guidance documents online on the day they're issued, compile all active guidance documents in one designated website location, clearly categorize these documents, and mark which ones have been rescinded (canceled). The Government Accountability Office would then audit whether agencies are following these rules within five years. **Who It Affects:** This bill affects federal agencies and the general public. Agencies would need to comply with new posting and organizational requirements for their guidance documents. Citizens, businesses, and organizations would benefit from easier access to agency guidance, since these documents explain how federal rules are interpreted and applied in practice—information many people currently have to hunt for across multiple agency websites. **Current Status:** The bill passed the House of Representatives. It has not yet been voted on by the Senate.
SHOW UP Act of 2025
# SHOW UP Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The SHOW UP Act would require federal government agencies to return to their remote work policies from December 31, 2019—essentially rolling back any expanded telework (work-from-home) arrangements made since then. Going forward, agencies could only expand telework policies if the Office of Personnel Management approves them and certifies that these policies would benefit the agency's mission and reduce costs. The bill applies to most federal agencies, excluding the Government Accountability Office. **Who It Affects:** This bill would directly impact federal employees who currently work remotely or have flexible work arrangements. It could affect millions of government workers across various agencies. Indirectly, it may influence federal contractors, employees who commute to federal offices, and communities around federal buildings. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. James Comer (R-KY) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill's stated purpose is to address concerns about productivity and operational costs associated with remote work policies adopted during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.