Bresnahan, Robert P. [R-PA-8]
Republican · PA · 16 bills sponsored
CFTC Office of the Chief Economist Act of 2026
# CFTC Office of the Chief Economist Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would establish an Office of the Chief Economist within the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), an independent federal agency that regulates futures and options markets. The legislation would create a formal position for a Chief Economist and define the office's responsibilities, though the specific duties aren't detailed in the available information. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect the CFTC's internal structure and operations. It could indirectly impact the commodity trading industry, financial markets, and consumers who use futures markets (farmers, businesses that hedge against price changes, and investors). The establishment of a Chief Economist role could influence how the agency analyzes economic data and develops policies. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 7488) was introduced by Representative Robert Bresnahan (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House. No additional details about provisions or timeline are currently available.
National Flood Insurance Program Affordability Act
# National Flood Insurance Program Affordability Act (HR 6934) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to address affordability issues within the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which is a federal program that provides flood insurance to property owners in flood-prone areas. While specific details aren't available in the basic bill information provided, the bill's title and sponsorship suggest it would seek to make flood insurance premiums more affordable for homeowners and property owners who currently carry or need NFIP coverage. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would primarily affect homeowners and property owners in flood-prone areas who rely on federal flood insurance, particularly those in Pennsylvania (the sponsor's home state) and other states with significant flood risk. It could also impact mortgage lenders, as federal law requires flood insurance for properties in high-risk flood zones with federally-backed mortgages. As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced to a full congressional vote. **Note:** For detailed provisions of this bill, you would need to consult Congress.gov or the full bill text, as the summary information provided is limited. The specific mechanisms the bill proposes to improve affordability—such as premium adjustments, subsidy changes, or program reforms—are not detailed in the basic legislative information available.
Water Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2025
# Water Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Water Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2025 would modernize and improve the nation's water systems. While specific details aren't publicly available yet, bills with this title typically focus on updating aging pipes, treatment facilities, and water distribution networks across the country. The bill would likely authorize federal funding and set standards for water infrastructure projects to ensure safe drinking water and reliable water services. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect communities relying on aging water infrastructure, water utility companies, and municipalities responsible for maintaining water systems. State and local governments would likely be involved in implementing improvements. Residents across the country could benefit from improved water quality and reliability, particularly in areas with outdated systems. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Robert P. Bresnahan (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee review. This means it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill needs committee approval before it can advance to a floor vote. --- *Note: Detailed provisions cannot be provided as the specific text of this bill is not publicly available in standard legislative databases. For complete information, check Congress.gov.*
Sgt. Walter F. Hartnett IV Green Star Veterans Service Act
# Sgt. Walter F. Hartnett IV Green Star Veterans Service Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, formally titled HR 6022, would establish the "Green Star Veterans Service Act," though specific details about its provisions are not publicly available in the summary provided. Based on the title referencing Sgt. Walter F. Hartnett IV and "Green Star" services, it appears to relate to veterans' services or benefits, but the exact scope of the legislation cannot be determined from the information available. **Current Status and Next Steps:** The bill was introduced by Representative Robert P. Bresnahan (R-PA-8) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee review. This means it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To understand the specific impact on veterans and which services would be affected, one would need to review the full text of the bill on Congress.gov or other legislative tracking websites. **Note:** For a complete understanding of who would be affected and what specific provisions the bill contains, readers should consult the full legislative text, as those details are not included in the basic summary information provided here.
Helping Our Heroes Act
# Helping Our Heroes Act (HR 5905) - Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a detailed summary of this bill because the information available is quite limited. The congressional record shows only basic metadata: it's a House bill sponsored by Rep. Robert Bresnahan (R-PA), currently in committee, but the actual text, detailed provisions, and subjects aren't included in what you've provided. To give you an accurate, factual summary as requested, I would need access to the bill's full text and legislative details. I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** - Search "HR 5905" for the complete bill text and summary - **House.gov** - For committee information and sponsor statements - **Your representative's official website** - Often includes constituent-friendly explanations If you can share the bill's full text or more detailed information, I'd be happy to provide the plain-language summary you're looking for.
Keep WIC Working Act
# Keep WIC Working Act Summary **What it does:** This bill ensures the federal government can continue funding the WIC program (Women, Infants, and Children nutrition assistance) if there's a gap in regular government funding during fiscal year 2026. It also reimburses states that used their own money to keep WIC running during any funding lapse that began on September 30, 2025. **Who it affects:** The bill protects roughly 6 million low-income women, infants, and children who rely on WIC for nutrition assistance, as well as state agencies administering the program. WIC provides food benefits, nutrition education, and referrals to health services for eligible families. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Rep. Robert Bresnahan (R-PA) and addresses a practical concern about maintaining essential nutrition services during funding transitions.
No Taxation Without Operation Act
# No Taxation Without Operation Act Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would suspend federal income tax collection on wages during government shutdowns caused by lapses in appropriations (when Congress fails to approve a budget). If passed, workers wouldn't owe federal income taxes on their wages during the shutdown period, and the government couldn't charge them penalties or interest for unpaid taxes. The bill also exempts "back pay" (wages owed but not received) from federal income taxes when federal employees and contractors finally receive those delayed paychecks after a shutdown ends. **Who It Affects:** This would benefit wage-earning workers, hourly employees, salaried workers, and tipped employees during shutdown periods. Federal employees and contractors who miss paychecks would also get tax relief when back pay is distributed. The Treasury Department would need to provide guidelines to employers on how to implement the tax suspension across different types of workers. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 5695) was introduced by Representative Robert P. Bresnahan (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to Ret. Col. Robert J. Graham for acts of valor while as a member of the Air Force during the Vietnam War.
# Summary of HR 5293 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to retired Colonel Robert J. Graham for acts of valor he performed while serving in the U.S. Air Force during the Vietnam War. The Medal of Honor is the nation's highest military decoration, awarded to service members who display exceptional courage and heroism in combat. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly affects Ret. Col. Graham, who would receive official recognition and the Medal of Honor if the bill passes and the President approves the award. It also involves Congress, which must authorize the award, and reflects recognition of Vietnam-era military service more broadly. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (HR 5293) remains in committee and has not advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Robert P. Bresnahan, a Republican from Pennsylvania's 8th district.
Mid-Atlantic River Basin Commissions Review Act
# Mid-Atlantic River Basin Commissions Review Act Summary **What the bill does:** This bill directs the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Congress's independent watchdog agency, to conduct a comprehensive review of three regional water commissions: the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, the Delaware River Basin Commission, and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. The GAO will examine their ethics policies, how they communicate with the public, and how they spend money. After reviewing, the GAO must report back to Congress with findings and recommendations for improving transparency and oversight. **Who it affects and key provisions:** The bill impacts the three commissions themselves and the states and districts they serve (Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, Virginia, West Virginia, and Washington D.C.). A key requirement is that each commission must respond to the GAO's recommendations by submitting action plans to Congress within 90 days of the report, and then annually for five years, detailing what steps they're taking to implement suggested improvements. **Current status:** The bill passed the House of Representatives and is now awaiting consideration in the Senate. It is a relatively narrow oversight measure focused on government accountability and transparency rather than changing water policy directly.
Local Farmers Feeding our Communities Act
# Summary: Local Farmers Feeding our Communities Act (HR 4782) **What the Bill Would Do** The Local Farmers Feeding our Communities Act is a proposed bill that would support local farming and community food systems. While specific details about its provisions are not publicly available in the summary provided, bills with this title typically aim to strengthen connections between local farmers and their communities—potentially through measures like funding farmer's markets, supporting direct-to-consumer sales, or expanding nutrition assistance programs that prioritize local produce. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect local farmers and rural communities, as well as consumers who buy food. It could also impact federal agricultural policy and any agencies that administer food assistance or farming programs. **Current Status** As of the information provided, HR 4782 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. At this stage, the bill remains under review and has not advanced to a floor vote. *Note: For complete details about specific provisions, you can visit Congress.gov and search for "HR 4782" to access the full bill text.*
SMART Act
# SMART Act (HR 4426) - Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this bill beyond what's listed in your header. To provide you with an accurate summary of what the SMART Act would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need to review the actual bill text. **What I can tell you:** HR 4426 is a Republican-sponsored bill currently in committee in the 119th Congress, meaning it hasn't yet advanced to a full vote in either chamber. **To get the information you're looking for, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 4426" for the full bill text and summary - Checking the bill's status and any committee reports - Reading the sponsor's official statement about the bill's purpose If you have access to the bill text or a summary and would like me to explain it in plain language, feel free to share that information and I'm happy to help break it down.
CEASE Act of 2025
# CEASE Act of 2025 Summary The CEASE Act would restrict the number of for-profit companies allowed to participate in the Small Business Administration's 7(a) lending program to a maximum of 16 at any time. The 7(a) program is one of the SBA's primary lending initiatives, where the federal government guarantees portions of loans that participating lenders make to small businesses. Currently, more companies participate in this program, so this bill would significantly reduce that number. The bill primarily affects small business lending companies and small business owners seeking loans. Lenders would face stricter authorization requirements, while small business borrowers could potentially have fewer lending options available to them. Supporters of the bill likely argue that limiting participants would improve oversight and quality control, while critics might contend it could reduce competition and make it harder for small businesses to access affordable loans. **Current Status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and awaits action in the Senate.
Simplifying Forms for Veterans Claims Act
# Simplifying Forms for Veterans Claims Act - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to hire an independent research organization to review and evaluate the forms that veterans must fill out when applying for benefits. The research center will analyze these forms and provide recommendations on how to make them clearer and easier to understand. The VA would then be required to implement at least some of these recommendations within two years. **Who It Affects:** Veterans applying for VA benefits would be the primary beneficiaries, as the bill aims to simplify the claims process. The VA itself would need to follow the recommendations and potentially redesign its forms. **Current Status:** The bill has already passed the House of Representatives. It is sponsored by Representative Robert Bresnahan (R-PA) and focuses on streamlining government processes and improving how the VA communicates with claimants. The next step would be for the Senate to consider the legislation.
To amend title 5, United States Code, to prohibit Members of Congress and their spouses from trading stock, and for other purposes.
# Congressional Stock Trading Ban Bill Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** HR 3182 would prohibit members of Congress and their spouses from buying and selling individual stocks. The bill aims to prevent conflicts of interest by stopping lawmakers from potentially profiting from non-public information they may learn through their work in government or making trading decisions based on legislation they're considering. **Who It Affects:** The primary targets are all current members of Congress (House and Senate members) and their spouses. The restriction would apply to personal stock trading while they serve in office. The bill falls under broader ethics regulations governed by federal law. **Current Status:** HR 3182 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Robert Bresnahan, a Republican from Pennsylvania. Congress has considered similar stock trading restrictions in recent years, with bipartisan support in some cases, reflecting public concern about whether lawmakers should profit from market investments while having access to insider information through their official duties.
Time to Choose Act of 2025
# Time to Choose Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Time to Choose Act of 2025 would restrict U.S. government contracts and procurement from going to companies with significant business ties to China. The bill aims to reduce American government spending with firms that have substantial financial or operational connections to Chinese entities, essentially creating a preference for companies with fewer China-related business interests when the federal government purchases goods and services. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact large corporations and defense contractors that do business in China or have Chinese ownership stakes, as well as companies in their supply chains. Federal agencies responsible for purchasing would need to implement new vetting procedures, and American businesses hoping to secure government contracts might face new requirements to disclose or restructure their China operations. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee (HR 2989, 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It was sponsored by Representative Robert Bresnahan (R-PA). The bill reflects broader congressional concern about national security and reducing economic dependence on China through federal spending practices.
Eric’s Law
# Eric's Law Summary **What the Bill Would Do** Eric's Law would change how death penalty cases are handled after a jury decides on sentencing. Currently, if jurors can't unanimously agree on whether someone should receive the death penalty, judges have some discretion in what happens next. This bill would require that if a jury fails to unanimously recommend death and the prosecution requests it, the case must go to a new sentencing hearing with a completely new jury. If that second jury also can't reach unanimous agreement, the judge would be banned from imposing the death sentence. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would affect defendants in federal capital (death penalty) cases and the federal court system. It's sponsored by Rep. Robert Bresnahan (R-PA) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill essentially makes it harder to sentence someone to death by requiring unanimous jury agreement and preventing judges from overriding a second jury's inability to agree.