Baumgartner, Michael [R-WA-5]
Republican · WA · 11 bills sponsored
Foreign Adversary AI Risk Assessment and Diplomacy Act
# Foreign Adversary AI Risk Assessment and Diplomacy Act (HR 7058) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This proposed legislation would require the U.S. government to assess risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) development in foreign adversary countries—likely referring to nations like China, Russia, and Iran. The bill appears designed to establish a formal process for evaluating how AI capabilities in these countries could threaten American interests, and would likely involve diplomatic efforts to address these concerns internationally. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill would primarily affect federal agencies responsible for national security and foreign policy, which would need to conduct and coordinate these risk assessments. It could indirectly impact U.S. technology companies and research institutions involved in AI development, depending on how the assessment findings inform policy. The bill's focus on diplomacy suggests it aims for international dialogue rather than purely defensive measures. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7058 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full House vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Michael Baumgartner (R-WA), and there is limited publicly available information about specific provisions or support for the measure.
American Artificial Intelligence Leadership and Uniformity Act
# American Artificial Intelligence Leadership and Uniformity Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill (HR 5388) aims to establish a unified federal framework for regulating artificial intelligence (AI) in the United States. Rather than allowing individual states to create their own AI rules, the bill would create consistent, nationwide standards for how AI systems are developed, tested, and used across the country. The goal is to position the U.S. as a global leader in AI innovation while ensuring safety and accountability. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The legislation would impact tech companies developing AI systems, businesses using AI tools, and potentially consumers who interact with AI applications. By creating uniform national standards instead of a patchwork of state-by-state regulations, the bill is intended to reduce compliance burdens on companies and prevent conflicting rules across different states. However, the bill's specific provisions—such as what safety requirements it would impose or how it would enforce standards—are not detailed in the available information. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced for a full House vote. This is an early stage in the legislative process, meaning it is still being reviewed and debated before any action could be taken.
Correcting Opportunity and Accountability in Collegiate Hiring Act (COACH Act)
# COACH Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Correcting Opportunity and Accountability in Collegiate Hiring Act (COACH Act) aims to address hiring practices at colleges and universities. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill's title suggests it focuses on ensuring fair and accountable hiring processes in collegiate settings, likely relating to coach positions or broader athletic department hiring. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily impact colleges and universities, their athletic departments, coaching staff, and potentially job applicants seeking positions in collegiate athletics. Depending on its specific provisions, it could also affect federal oversight of higher education institutions. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5812 remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Michael Baumgartner (R-WA-5) in the 119th Congress. To better understand the bill's exact provisions and requirements, the full text would need to be reviewed, as limited details are currently available in the public record.
PROTECT Act
I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a substantive summary of this bill because the information provided is incomplete. While I can see that HR 5693 is sponsored by Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R-WA) and is currently in committee, the critical details are missing—including what the bill actually proposes to do (listed as "N/A" for subjects). To give you an accurate, factual summary for a general audience, I would need access to: - The bill's actual text or official summary - Key provisions and what they would change - Which populations or industries would be affected - The stated purpose of the legislation **If you have a link to the bill or more details**, I'd be happy to summarize it. You can typically find full bill information on Congress.gov, which is the official source for legislative details.
United States–Mexican War Memorial Act of 2025
# United States–Mexican War Memorial Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** If passed, HR 5510 would authorize the creation of a national memorial dedicated to the United States–Mexican War (1846-1848). The bill would establish a permanent monument to commemorate this historical conflict and the Americans who participated in it. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect veterans' groups, historians, and the general public interested in American military history. It could involve federal land, funding, and resources for memorial construction and maintenance, though specific details about location, design, or budget are not provided in the available information. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee as of the 119th Congress, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Michael Baumgartner (R-WA-5). *Note: Limited details are publicly available about this bill's specific provisions. For complete information, you can review the full text on Congress.gov.*
To make technical amendments to update statutory references to certain provisions which were formerly classified to chapters 14 and 19 of title 25, United States Code, and to correct related technical errors.
# HR 4584 Summary **What It Does** This bill makes technical corrections to federal law related to Native American affairs. Specifically, it updates outdated legal references in the U.S. Code that point to old sections of Native American law (chapters 14 and 19 of title 25) that have been reorganized or moved. The bill essentially fixes "broken links" in federal law by directing courts and agencies to the correct current locations of these provisions. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects Native American tribes, federal agencies that work with tribal nations, and courts that interpret federal Indian law. It's a "housekeeping" measure rather than a policy change—it doesn't create new rights or restrictions, but ensures that existing laws remain properly referenced and functional. **Current Status** HR 4584 was introduced by Representative Michael Baumgartner (R-WA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee. As a technical correction bill, it would typically face minimal controversy, though no vote has been scheduled yet.
International Traffic in Arms Regulations Licensing Reform Act
# International Traffic in Arms Regulations Licensing Reform Act Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would reform how the State Department handles licenses for exporting military equipment and related technology to other countries. Currently, the State Department manages these exports under "International Traffic in Arms Regulations" (ITAR). The bill would streamline the licensing process, likely making it faster and less burdensome for companies seeking to export military items or defense technology internationally. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects defense contractors, military equipment manufacturers, and technology companies that export weapons or defense-related products abroad. It also involves Congressional oversight of State Department operations. Specific provisions focus on improving administrative procedures and regulatory processes—essentially how applications are reviewed and approved—though the bill subjects remain broad administrative and licensing reforms. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and would next need Senate approval before going to the President for a final decision. Without access to the full legislative text, the specific details of proposed reforms (such as timeline changes or streamlined review procedures) cannot be detailed here, but the general intent is to make the military export licensing system more efficient.
No Paydays for Hostage-Takers Act
# No Paydays for Hostage-Takers Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to prevent hostile foreign governments and terrorist organizations from accessing U.S. financial resources when they detain Americans. If passed, it would restrict financial transactions, bank accounts, and assets in the United States connected to countries or entities that hold American hostages. The legislation also seeks to increase congressional oversight of hostage situations and diplomacy efforts involving detained Americans. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions:** The bill primarily targets Iran and other nations accused of detaining U.S. citizens, with references to involvement by Qatar and mentions of sanctions-related measures. It would impact American hostages and their families, as well as foreign governments and their access to U.S. financial systems. The legislation includes provisions related to visa restrictions, travel bans, and coordination with international bodies like the United Nations. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. As a newly introduced bill in the 119th Congress, it remains in the early legislative stage and has not advanced further in the process.
Restore College Sports Act
# Restore College Sports Act (HR 2663) Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Restore College Sports Act would modify federal regulations affecting college athletics, though specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information. Based on the bill's title, it appears designed to address changes in college sports—likely referring to recent shifts in NCAA rules around athlete compensation, transfer eligibility, or related governance issues. Without access to the full text, the exact scope of changes cannot be specified. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact college athletes, universities and their athletic departments, the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association), and potentially sports fans and the broadcasting industry that covers college sports. **Current Status:** As of the latest information, HR 2663 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full floor vote in the House. The bill was sponsored by Representative Michael Baumgartner (R-WA). *Note: For a complete understanding of this bill's specific provisions and implications, reviewing the full legislative text would be necessary, as the detailed language isn't available in this summary.*
DETERRENT Act
# DETERRENT Act Summary **What It Does:** The DETERRENT Act increases transparency requirements for colleges and universities regarding their financial relationships with foreign sources. If passed, colleges would need to report to the Department of Education any gifts or contracts from countries of concern (like China or Russia), regardless of amount. For other foreign sources, the reporting threshold would lower from $250,000 to $50,000. The bill also requires disclosure when universities enter contracts with foreign countries of concern after receiving government waivers, and addresses situations where foreign entities substantially control U.S. educational institutions. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily impacts colleges and universities that receive funding or gifts from foreign sources. It also affects international students and scholars, as increased scrutiny of foreign funding could influence institutional policies. The Department of Education would handle the new reporting requirements. **Current Status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is now awaiting consideration in the Senate. The stated intent is to address national security concerns by improving oversight of foreign influence in higher education institutions, though supporters and critics may differ on whether the new disclosure thresholds effectively balance transparency with international academic collaboration.
PROTECT Student Athletes Act
# PROTECT Student Athletes Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The PROTECT Student Athletes Act (HR 1552) is a proposed federal law that aims to establish protections for student athletes, particularly regarding their safety and rights. While specific details about the bill's provisions aren't provided in the information available, bills with this title typically focus on issues like protecting athletes from abuse, ensuring proper medical care and concussion protocols, or safeguarding student athletes' eligibility and fair treatment. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact student athletes at schools across the country, along with schools, athletic programs, and coaches who work with them. Depending on its specific provisions, it could also affect parents, athletic organizations, and possibly the NCAA. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 1552 remains "In Committee," meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Michael Baumgartner (R-WA). *Note: To understand the specific protections and requirements this bill would establish, you would need to review the full text of HR 1552, which is available on Congress.gov.*