Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7]
Republican · MO · 19 bills sponsored
Counter Drone State and Local Defender Act
# Counter Drone State and Local Defender Act (HR 7525) Summary **What It Would Do** This bill would give state and local law enforcement agencies the legal authority to detect, track, and disable drones operating in their jurisdictions. Currently, the federal government tightly controls these abilities under Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations. If passed, the bill would expand local police departments and state authorities' power to counter drone threats without needing federal permission first. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects state and local law enforcement agencies, who would gain new tools and legal protections to address drone-related public safety concerns. It could also impact drone operators and businesses, as they might face local restrictions. The general public could be affected depending on how aggressively local authorities use these new powers. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Eric Burlison (R-Missouri) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. At this stage, the bill is still in early consideration and has not advanced to debate or a vote.
Smart Space Act of 2026
# Smart Space Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Smart Space Act of 2026 (HR 7388) is a proposed law currently being considered by Congress. However, the available information about this bill is limited—the subjects and specific provisions are not yet detailed in the public record. To understand exactly what this legislation would accomplish, more detailed information from Congress would be needed. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Eric Burlison (R-MO) and is currently in committee review, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Bills at this stage often undergo discussion, revision, and expert testimony before moving forward. **Next Steps:** If you're interested in learning more about this bill's specific provisions and impacts, you can check Congress.gov or contact Representative Burlison's office for the most up-to-date details as the bill moves through the legislative process.
FIT Procurement Act
# FIT Procurement Act Summary The FIT Procurement Act (HR 4123) is a bill currently under review in the House of Representatives. While specific details about the bill's provisions aren't available in the information provided, the acronym "FIT" typically relates to federal procurement or acquisition practices. The bill would likely affect federal agencies' purchasing processes, government contractors, and potentially federal spending efficiency. To provide you with a comprehensive summary of the key provisions and who would be impacted, I would need access to the bill's text and official summary. I recommend checking Congress.gov, where you can search for "HR 4123" to find: - The full bill text - A detailed summary of provisions - Current status and any action taken in committee - Statements from the sponsor or other lawmakers This will give you accurate, up-to-date information directly from the official source.
Auto Data Privacy and Autonomy Act
# Auto Data Privacy and Autonomy Act (HR 6734) Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would establish federal privacy protections for data collected by connected vehicles and autonomous cars. It aims to create rules around what personal information automakers and technology companies can collect from vehicles (such as location data, driving habits, and biometric information), how that data can be used, and what rights consumers have regarding their information. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact car manufacturers, tech companies that develop vehicle systems, and vehicle owners. As more cars become "connected" with internet access and autonomous features, this bill would set national standards for protecting the personal data generated by these vehicles. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It has not advanced to further legislative action at this time.
Government Shutdown Efficiency Act
# Government Shutdown Efficiency Act Summary The Government Shutdown Efficiency Act (HR 6023) is a bill introduced in the House of Representatives that would address what happens during federal government shutdowns. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically propose changes to how the government operates when Congress fails to pass a budget and funding lapses occur. The bill would affect federal employees, government operations, and potentially the public services that depend on federal funding. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been assigned to the relevant House committee for review and discussion but has not yet been brought to a full House vote. As a result, its specific provisions and potential impacts cannot be detailed without access to the full legislative text. To learn more about what the bill would specifically do, you would need to review the complete bill text on Congress.gov or contact the sponsor's office.
Train Crew Choice Act
# Train Crew Choice Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Train Crew Choice Act (HR 5135) would give railroad workers more flexibility in choosing their work schedules and staffing arrangements. The bill aims to shift some decision-making power from railroad companies to train crews regarding how they staff trains and manage their work schedules, rather than allowing companies to make these decisions unilaterally. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill primarily affects railroad workers and the rail industry. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the basic information available, bills with this title typically address crew scheduling practices and worker input into staffing decisions—issues that have been central to recent railroad labor negotiations and safety discussions in Congress. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5135 remains in committee and has not been brought to a vote in the House. This means it's still in the early legislative process and would need to advance through committee review before it could be considered by the full House of Representatives. *Note: For a complete understanding of all specific provisions, you would want to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.*
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States related to the public debt.
# Summary of HJRES 112 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill proposes a constitutional amendment related to how the federal government handles public debt. While the specific details aren't provided in the information available, constitutional amendment proposals typically aim to change fundamental rules about government borrowing, spending limits, or debt management. To become law, such an amendment would need to pass both the House and Senate with a two-thirds majority in each chamber, then be ratified by at least 38 state legislatures. **Who It Affects:** A debt-related constitutional amendment would potentially affect all Americans, as it could reshape how the federal government finances its operations, sets budgets, and manages long-term financial obligations. It could impact everything from Social Security and Medicare to military spending and infrastructure programs. **Current Status:** The bill (HJRES 112) is currently in committee, meaning it's under review and has not yet been brought to a full vote in Congress. It was introduced by Representative Eric Burlison, a Republican from Missouri. At this early stage, the proposal remains in the initial legislative process. *Note: The bill summary provided doesn't include the amendment's specific language, so the exact provisions cannot be detailed here. You may want to review the full text on Congress.gov for complete details.*
Freights First Act
# Freights First Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Freights First Act would change which trains get priority on certain railroad tracks. Currently, Amtrak (the national passenger rail service) has the legal right to use rail lines near ports and rail yards before freight trains. This bill would remove that preference in areas within 50 miles of ports or major rail yards, giving freight companies equal or greater priority in those locations. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect Amtrak passengers, freight railroad companies, and communities served by passenger rail in areas near ports and major transportation hubs. Passengers could experience delays if freight trains take priority, while shipping companies might see faster transport of goods. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. As of now, it remains under review and has not advanced further in the legislative process.
Judicial Review Timeline Clarity Act
# Judicial Review Timeline Clarity Act (HR 3905) Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill aims to clarify the timelines that courts must follow when reviewing certain legal cases and government decisions. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this type of title typically establish clearer deadlines for federal judges to issue decisions on appeals or challenges to agency actions, reducing delays in the court system. **Who it affects:** The bill would impact federal courts, government agencies, businesses, and individuals involved in litigation—particularly those challenging federal agency decisions or waiting for court rulings on appeals. **Current status:** HR 3905 is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To understand the exact provisions and requirements of this bill, you would need to review the full legislative text on Congress.gov.
Propane Accessibility and Regulatory Relief Act
# Propane Accessibility and Regulatory Relief Act (HR 3949) — Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to make it easier for propane businesses to operate and increase propane availability across the country. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on reducing regulatory requirements that propane companies must follow, streamlining permitting processes, and potentially expanding where propane can be stored or distributed. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact propane companies, heating oil distributors, and rural communities that rely on propane for heating and energy. It could also affect farmers and agricultural operations that use propane as fuel. Homeowners and businesses that depend on propane for heating or cooking may see changes in availability or pricing if regulations are reduced. **Current Status** As of now, HR 3949 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Missouri) and is still in the early stages of the legislative process. Further details about specific regulatory changes would become clearer if and when the bill moves forward for debate and amendment.
Reliable Grid Act
# Reliable Grid Act (HR 3751) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Reliable Grid Act is a proposed federal law currently being reviewed in Congress. However, the bill's specific details and provisions are not available in the information provided. To understand exactly what this legislation would accomplish, you would need to access the full bill text through Congress.gov or similar legislative tracking resources. The title suggests it relates to improving or maintaining grid reliability—likely addressing electricity system performance—but the exact mechanisms and scope cannot be determined from this summary information alone. **Who It Affects & Current Status** This bill was introduced by Representative Eric Burlison (R-MO) in the 119th Congress. It is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Until the committee reviews it and votes to advance it, the bill remains in early stages and may not proceed further. **Next Steps** To learn more about this legislation, you can visit Congress.gov and search for "HR 3751" to read the complete bill text, view any amendments, and track its progress through Congress.
Guidance Clarity Act
# Guidance Clarity Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Guidance Clarity Act would change how federal agencies create and enforce informal guidance documents—things like policy letters, interpretations, and FAQs that agencies use to explain how they'll implement laws and regulations. Currently, agencies can issue these guidance documents with minimal public input. This bill would require agencies to follow more formal procedures when creating guidance, including giving the public advance notice and a chance to comment before guidance takes effect. The bill aims to make the regulatory process more transparent and give people clearer notice about how agencies interpret the laws they enforce. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill would primarily affect federal agencies and the people or businesses subject to their rules. It would require agencies to distinguish between binding rules (which already undergo formal review) and non-binding guidance, and to be more transparent about which category something falls into. The bill would also likely require agencies to keep better records of their guidance documents and make them easier for the public to find and access. **Current Status** As of now, HR 2409 is in committee and has not passed either chamber of Congress. It has not yet received a vote.
Paycheck Protection Act
# Paycheck Protection Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Paycheck Protection Act (HR 2174) would modify how federal employees' paychecks and benefits are handled, specifically addressing government employee compensation, benefits administration, and labor-management relations. The bill also includes provisions related to the U.S. Postal Service. While the specific details require reviewing the full legislative text, the bill's focus areas suggest it would change rules around federal employee pay structures and benefit management. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact federal government employees across various agencies and the U.S. Postal Service workforce. Depending on its specific provisions, it could also affect federal unions and labor organizations that represent these employees, as well as taxpayers who fund federal employee compensation. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full floor vote in the House of Representatives. No action has been taken to move it forward at this time. --- *Note: For complete details on specific provisions, review the full bill text on Congress.gov, as this summary covers the broad subject areas without access to the bill's detailed language.*
Ending the Cycle of Dependency Act of 2025
# Summary: Ending the Cycle of Dependency Act of 2025 **What It Would Do:** This bill would require most working-age adults (ages 19-59) to work or participate in work-related activities for at least 80 hours per month to keep their Medicaid health insurance coverage. Similar work requirements would be extended to people receiving SNAP benefits (food assistance). Adults could meet the requirement by working, participating in job training programs, doing community service, or combining these activities. States would have the option to remove people from Medicaid if they don't meet these requirements. **Who It Affects & Key Provisions:** The bill would impact millions of Medicaid and SNAP recipients. However, it includes exemptions for people with disabilities, those caring for young children (under age 6), and full-time students. The bill essentially ties continued eligibility for these assistance programs to demonstrated work activity. Current status: The bill has been introduced and is in committee review, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
UNPLUG EVs Act
# UNPLUG EVs Act Summary The UNPLUG EVs Act (HR 1052) is a bill introduced in the House of Representatives that would eliminate federal tax credits and incentives for electric vehicle purchases. Currently in committee, the bill would remove the existing $7,500 federal tax credit that helps offset the cost of buying new electric vehicles, making EVs more expensive for consumers compared to their current pricing. The bill primarily affects potential EV buyers, automobile manufacturers, and the clean energy industry. It would eliminate financial incentives designed to encourage Americans to transition away from gasoline-powered vehicles. This would likely increase the effective purchase price of electric vehicles, potentially reducing their market competitiveness against traditional gas-powered cars and other EVs without federal support. **Current Status:** The bill remains in committee and has not yet moved forward for a vote in the House. No further action has been taken since its introduction in the 119th Congress.
ACE Act
# ACE Act Summary The **Achieving Choice in Education Act (HR 750)** would expand what families can pay for using 529 college savings plans with tax-free money. Currently, 529 plans allow up to $10,000 per year in tax-free withdrawals for private or religious K-12 school tuition. This bill would add homeschooling expenses to that list, plus cover related costs like curriculum materials, books, tutoring, online courses, and testing fees. The bill also makes changes to how state and local bonds are taxed. **Who it affects:** Families who use 529 plans to save for education, particularly those considering or using homeschooling or private school options. The bill offers them more flexibility in how they can use these tax-advantaged savings accounts. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (H.R. 750 in the 119th Congress), sponsored by Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO). It has not yet been voted on by the full House.
Life at Conception Act
# Life at Conception Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Life at Conception Act would declare that the Constitution protects the right to life beginning at the moment of fertilization (when a sperm and egg join). This would establish a federal legal position that life begins at conception rather than at later stages of pregnancy. The bill includes a provision stating that pregnant women themselves cannot be prosecuted under this law for losing a pregnancy. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact abortion policy nationwide by potentially restricting abortion access at all stages of pregnancy. It would also affect medical practices related to fertility treatments, miscarriage management, and research involving embryos. The bill explicitly protects women from criminal prosecution, though it could affect medical providers and others involved in abortion services. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. As a Republican-sponsored bill in a Republican-controlled House, it has a pathway forward, though passage would require support from both chambers and the signature of the President to become law.
Repeal the NFA Act
# Summary of HR 335: Repeal the NFA Act **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would completely eliminate the National Firearms Act (NFA), a 1934 federal law that regulates certain weapons and firearm accessories. Currently, the NFA requires federal registration, background checks, and a $200 tax for items like suppressors, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, machine guns made after 1986, and other specified weapons. If passed, HR 335 would remove all these requirements and regulations. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact gun owners, law enforcement agencies, and the federal government's revenue. Gun owners would no longer need to register certain weapons or pay the $200 tax. Law enforcement and the ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) would lose a regulatory tool they currently use to track these items. The federal government would lose tax revenue from the $200 fees collected annually. **Current Status** As of now, HR 335 is in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) in the 119th Congress. Bills at this stage typically face significant procedural hurdles before advancing to a floor vote.
Abolish the ATF Act
# Abolish the ATF Act Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would eliminate the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), a federal agency that currently enforces laws related to firearms, explosives, and certain tax regulations. If passed, the ATF would be shut down entirely, and its existing responsibilities would need to be reassigned or discontinued. **Who it affects:** The bill would impact gun owners, firearms manufacturers and dealers, law enforcement agencies that work with the ATF, and federal employees working at the agency. It would also affect enforcement of federal firearms regulations, explosives oversight, and alcohol and tobacco tax compliance. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Eric Burlison (R-MO) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill has not advanced beyond the initial committee review stage.