Bean, Aaron [R-FL-4]
Republican · FL · 19 bills sponsored
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand eligibility for health savings accounts, and for other purposes.
# Bill Summary: Health Savings Account Expansion (HR 7681) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change the rules around Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), which are special savings accounts that allow people to set aside pre-tax money to pay for medical expenses. Currently, HSAs have strict eligibility requirements—you can only open one if you're enrolled in a high-deductible health insurance plan. The bill seeks to expand who can use these accounts, though the specific details of the expansion aren't fully outlined in the available information. **Who It Affects** The changes would primarily affect individuals and families seeking to save money for healthcare costs in a tax-advantaged way. Depending on how eligibility is expanded, it could benefit people currently excluded from using HSAs, potentially including those with different types of health insurance plans or coverage situations. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's still in the early legislative stage and hasn't been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Further details about specific provisions would likely emerge if the bill advances through the committee process.
Punishing Health Care Fraudsters Act
# Punishing Health Care Fraudsters Act (HR 7569) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to strengthen penalties for people who commit fraud in the healthcare system. While specific details aren't available in the basic summary provided, bills with this title typically propose increasing criminal penalties, fines, or prison sentences for individuals convicted of healthcare fraud—such as billing for services not rendered, unnecessary treatments, or filing false insurance claims. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact healthcare providers, medical facilities, and individuals who commit healthcare fraud. It could also affect the healthcare system more broadly by potentially reducing fraudulent claims that drive up costs for insurers and patients. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Aaron Bean (R-FL), a Republican from Florida. *Note: For complete details on specific penalties and provisions, you would need to review the full bill text, which should be available on Congress.gov.*
ICHRA Permanency Act
# ICHRA Permanency Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The ICHRA Permanency Act would make permanent a temporary healthcare rule that currently expires. ICHRA stands for "Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangement"—a program that allows employers to give employees money to buy their own health insurance on the open market instead of offering traditional group health plans. Currently, this option is set to expire, and this bill would extend it indefinitely. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect employers and employees. Employers who want flexibility in how they offer health benefits could continue using this approach, and employees at those companies would have the option to receive reimbursement funds for individual insurance purchases rather than employer-sponsored group plans. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Rep. Aaron Bean (R-FL).
Transparency in Reporting of Adversarial Contributions to Education Act
# Summary of HR 1049: Transparency in Reporting of Adversarial Contributions to Education Act **What the Bill Does:** HR 1049 requires schools that receive federal funding to inform parents about their rights to access information regarding foreign government influence in schools. Parents would be able to request and review curriculum materials and professional development resources that were paid for with foreign government funds, find out how many school employees are compensated using foreign funds, and learn about any contracts or agreements schools have with foreign countries or designated foreign entities of concern. **Who It Affects:** The bill applies to all public elementary and secondary schools receiving federal education funding. It primarily affects school administrators (who must establish notification systems) and parents (who gain new transparency rights regarding foreign financial involvement in schools). The bill names China as an example of a country of concern but covers any foreign government or designated "foreign entity of concern." **Current Status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is a part of the 119th Congress. Parents would need to submit written requests to access the information, which schools would be required to provide in written form.
We Want Our Healthcare Money Back Act of 2025
# We Want Our Healthcare Money Back Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill (HR 5871) has been introduced in the House of Representatives but currently lacks publicly available detailed information about its specific provisions. Based on its title, it appears to address healthcare funding or reimbursement, but the actual text and substantive details are not yet widely documented in public records. **Current status and next steps:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been assigned to a House committee for review and discussion but has not advanced further in the legislative process. Most bills introduced in Congress do not become law—they either remain in committee indefinitely or are voted down. **What you should know:** Since this bill's specific language is not yet readily available, if you're interested in this legislation, you can find more information by visiting Congress.gov (search "HR 5871") where the full text will appear once formally released. This will clarify who would be affected and what specific healthcare changes are proposed.
Medical License Verification Act
# Medical License Verification Act (HR 5872) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Medical License Verification Act aims to establish or strengthen procedures for verifying that doctors and medical professionals hold valid licenses before they can practice. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills of this type typically create standardized verification systems, potentially making it easier for hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare facilities to confirm that physicians are properly licensed and in good standing. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect healthcare providers and facilities (hospitals, clinics, private practices) that employ doctors, as well as patients who receive medical care. It could also impact state medical licensing boards that regulate physicians. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Rep. Aaron Bean (R-FL). At this stage, the bill is still in the early phases of the legislative process and would need committee approval and a House floor vote to advance further. *Note: More detailed information about specific provisions would be available once the bill text is formally released.*
PROMPT Act
# PROMPT Act Summary I appreciate your request, but I don't have access to the full text or details of HR 5873 (the PROMPT Act) from the 119th Congress. The information provided shows it's a House bill sponsored by Rep. Aaron Bean (R-FL), currently in committee, but lacks the substantive details needed to explain what it would actually do. To provide you with an accurate, plain-language summary, I would need access to: - The bill's full text - Its stated purpose and key provisions - Which committee(s) it's assigned to - Any official summaries from Congress.gov **I'd recommend checking [Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov) directly**, where you can search for "HR 5873" to find the complete bill text, a summary, and current status. This will give you the most reliable, up-to-date information. If you have the bill text available or can share more details about what it addresses, I'm happy to help summarize it!
Aviation Funding Stability Act of 2025
# Aviation Funding Stability Act of 2025 Summary **What It Does:** This bill would automatically keep the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) funded at previous-year spending levels if Congress fails to pass a regular budget before a new fiscal year begins. Instead of a complete shutdown, the FAA would continue operating using money from the Airport and Airway Trust Fund (which comes from airline ticket taxes and fuel fees). This temporary funding would last until Congress passes an actual budget or 30 days pass without any appropriations law in effect, whichever comes first. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects the FAA and aviation system users—including commercial airlines, airport operations, air traffic control services, and the traveling public. It aims to prevent service disruptions that occur when the FAA loses funding due to budget deadlocks in Congress. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 5455) was introduced by Representative Aaron Bean (R-FL) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
LEO K9 Protection Act
# LEO K9 Protection Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The LEO K9 Protection Act is a proposed federal law focused on protecting police dogs (K9s) used by law enforcement agencies. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to establish stronger legal penalties for harming, injuring, or killing police dogs during the course of their duties. The legislation would likely define these offenses and set federal criminal consequences for violations. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect law enforcement agencies that use K9 units, as well as individuals who harm these working dogs. It could also impact the federal criminal justice system by adding new federal crimes and penalties. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 4755) is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote by the House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Aaron Bean, a Republican from Florida's 4th district. For a complete understanding of the specific provisions and penalties the bill proposes, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or other official legislative databases.
Delivering On Government Efficiency in Spending Act
# Delivering On Government Efficiency in Spending Act (HR 4311) — Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill, introduced by Rep. Aaron Bean (R-FL), aims to improve how the federal government manages and tracks its spending. While the official summary is limited, the bill appears to focus on government financial practices, including how federal bank accounts and deposits are handled and maintained. The legislation relates to government information systems and archives, suggesting it may address record-keeping and transparency in federal finances. **Who It Affects and Current Status:** The bill would primarily affect federal agencies and departments responsible for managing government funds and financial records. It could also impact the general public by potentially improving transparency about how taxpayer money is spent. As of now, HR 4311 is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the relevant House committee for review and debate but has not yet moved forward for a full House vote. Without more detailed legislative language publicly available, the specific requirements and changes the bill would implement remain unclear.
Apples to Apples Comparison Act of 2025
# Apples to Apples Comparison Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Apples to Apples Comparison Act of 2025 (HR 4093) is currently in congressional committee and has not yet advanced to a floor vote. Based on its title, the bill appears designed to establish standardized comparison methods, though the specific details about what is being compared and regulated are not available in the provided information. **Current Status:** This bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Aaron Bean (R-FL) but remains in committee review. Without access to the full text or detailed summary, the exact provisions, affected parties, and implementation details cannot be specified. The bill has not yet moved forward in the legislative process. **Next Steps:** To learn more about this bill's specific purpose and provisions, you would need to review the full legislative text on Congress.gov, which would provide detailed information about what comparisons it standardizes and which industries or stakeholders it affects.
National POW/MIA Memorial and Museum Act
# National POW/MIA Memorial and Museum Act (HR 3057) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish a National POW/MIA (Prisoners of War/Missing in Action) Memorial and Museum. If passed, it would create a dedicated facility to honor and commemorate American service members who were captured, held as prisoners of war, or went missing during military conflicts. The museum would serve as both a memorial space and an educational center about these soldiers' experiences. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects military veterans and their families—particularly those with connections to POW/MIA service members. It would also impact the general public by creating a new national museum and memorial site for educational and commemorative purposes. The Department of Defense and relevant federal agencies would be involved in implementing the facility. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3057 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Aaron Bean (R-FL). No additional details about specific provisions, funding amounts, or location are provided in the available information.
Maritime Fuel Tax Parity Act
# Maritime Fuel Tax Parity Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Maritime Fuel Tax Parity Act aims to adjust how the federal government taxes fuel used in maritime (ocean-going) vessels. Currently, there's a difference in how fuel taxes are applied to ships compared to other transportation modes. This bill would seek to create more consistent or "equal" tax treatment across the maritime industry. The specific details of what tax changes would occur aren't detailed in the available information, but the bill's name suggests it would address perceived unfairness in the current tax structure. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily impact the maritime shipping industry, including commercial vessels, shipping companies, and potentially fuel suppliers. It could also have indirect effects on consumers through shipping costs. As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it's still in the early stage of the legislative process and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Rep. Aaron Bean (R-FL) introduced the legislation in the 119th Congress.
Flexible Savings Arrangements for a Healthy Robust America Act
# Summary of HR 2667: Flexible Savings Arrangements for a Healthy Robust America Act **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, currently under review in committee, would modify how Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) and Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs) work. These are special savings accounts that allow workers to set aside pre-tax money to pay for medical expenses. The bill aims to increase the flexibility and usefulness of these accounts by making changes to current rules, though the specific details of those changes are not publicly available at this stage of the legislative process. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily affect people who have health insurance through their employers, particularly those enrolled in high-deductible health plans. It could also impact employers who offer these benefits and the broader healthcare system. As of now, the bill remains "in committee," meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The specific provisions have not been finalized, making it difficult to assess the full scope of its potential impact.
Maintaining Cooperative Permitting Act of 2025
# Maintaining Cooperative Permitting Act of 2025 (HR 2030) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish or maintain cooperative permitting processes between federal and state governments. While specific details aren't publicly available yet (the bill's detailed provisions haven't been fully disclosed), cooperative permitting generally allows states to work alongside federal agencies to streamline environmental reviews and project approvals. This approach aims to reduce delays and duplication when projects require both state and federal permits. **Who It Affects:** The bill would likely impact developers, construction companies, and businesses undertaking projects that require environmental permits (such as infrastructure, energy, or development projects). It would also affect state and federal agencies involved in permitting, and potentially the general public through faster project timelines. **Current Status:** HR 2030 is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Aaron Bean (R-FL) in the 119th Congress. *Note: For complete details on the bill's specific provisions, you can review the full text on Congress.gov when it becomes available.*
CUTS Act
# CUTS Act (HR 1654) Summary I appreciate your request, but I need to be transparent: while I can see this bill's metadata (sponsor, status, and subject categories), the document itself wasn't included in what you shared. The subject list suggests it's a broad bill touching on regulatory procedures, agriculture, energy, and other areas, but I cannot accurately summarize what the bill actually *does* without seeing its text. **To give you an accurate summary, I would need:** - The bill's full text or legislative summary - Its stated purpose and key provisions If you can provide the bill text or a link to it (Congress.gov is a good source), I'd be happy to summarize it clearly for a general audience. Alternatively, searching "HR 1654 CUTS Act" on Congress.gov should give you both the full text and official summaries.
Freedom from Government Competition Act of 2025
# Freedom from Government Competition Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Freedom from Government Competition Act of 2025 would restrict the federal government's ability to compete with private businesses when providing goods and services. If passed, federal agencies would need to justify why they should perform certain functions in-house rather than contracting that work to private companies. The bill would give the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) authority to oversee these decisions and likely require more government work to be outsourced to the private sector. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill would impact federal agencies across government, private contractors and businesses that bid on government work, and federal employees whose jobs could potentially be affected by increased outsourcing. The bill emphasizes "public-private cooperation," suggesting a preference for private sector involvement in government functions. It would increase congressional oversight of government procurement decisions and give OMB stronger authority to review and challenge agency decisions to keep work in-house. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (HR 1554) is in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. It was introduced by Representative Aaron Bean (R-FL) in the 119th Congress. Like most bills in committee, it would need committee approval, then floor debate and voting in the House before it could move to the Senate for consideration.
DRAIN THE SWAMP Act
# DRAIN THE SWAMP Act Summary The DRAIN THE SWAMP Act (HR 1280) is a bill introduced by Representative Aaron Bean (R-FL) that would impose restrictions on federal government operations and employee benefits. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, based on its listed subjects, it appears to address federal workplace policies including employee compensation, benefits, use of government facilities and technology, and congressional oversight of government operations. The bill's title suggests it aims to reduce what supporters view as excess in federal government spending or operations. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. This is an early stage in the legislative process, and many bills at this stage do not advance further. **Who It Affects:** If passed, the bill would primarily affect federal government employees and potentially impact how Congress oversees federal agencies and spending. *Note: For complete details on specific provisions, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov, as the summary information available is limited.*
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to establish a community engagement requirement for certain individuals under the Medicaid program.
# HR 1279 Summary: Medicaid Work Requirements **What the Bill Would Do** HR 1279 would require most Medicaid recipients between ages 18 and 65 to work, perform community service, or participate in job training programs for at least 80 hours per month. Adults who don't meet this requirement for three or more months in a year would lose their Medicaid coverage and federal funding would no longer support their benefits. The goal is to tie Medicaid eligibility to work participation. **Who It Affects and Key Exceptions** The bill would primarily impact working-age adults on Medicaid. However, it includes exemptions for people who are pregnant, disabled, caring for children or incapacitated individuals, already meeting work requirements through other programs, in drug/alcohol treatment, or enrolled in school at least half-time. States would have flexibility in how they enforce the requirements and determine who qualifies for exemptions. **Current Status** As of now, HR 1279 is in committee and has not been voted on by Congress. The bill was introduced by Representative Aaron Bean (R-FL) in the 119th Congress. Work requirements for Medicaid have been debated for years, with supporters arguing they encourage self-sufficiency and critics concerned about people losing health coverage.