Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]
Republican · OH · 20 bills sponsored
To ensure domestic sources of the critical mineral vanadium necessary for the steel, infrastructure, energy, and defense needs of the United States, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 7523 **What the Bill Does:** This bill aims to secure domestic sources of vanadium, a mineral critical to American manufacturing and national security. Vanadium is used to strengthen steel for infrastructure projects, power grid systems, batteries for renewable energy storage, and military equipment. Currently, the U.S. relies heavily on foreign sources for vanadium, which the bill proposes to address by developing American supplies. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact steel manufacturers, construction and infrastructure companies, renewable energy producers, defense contractors, and potentially mining operations. It could also affect American consumers indirectly through infrastructure and energy projects that depend on vanadium-containing materials. **Current Status:** HR 7523, sponsored by Representative Troy Balderson (R-OH), is currently in committee review, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill's specific provisions are not detailed in the summary provided, so it's unclear whether it includes funding incentives, regulatory changes, or other mechanisms to encourage domestic vanadium production.
Reliable Power Act
# Reliable Power Act Summary **What It Does:** The Reliable Power Act requires the nation's electric reliability organization (NERC) to conduct yearly assessments of whether the U.S. electrical grid has enough power generation capacity to meet demand reliably. If NERC determines the system is at risk, it must alert the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). FERC would then notify other federal agencies including the Department of Energy and EPA. The bill creates a review process where federal agencies must explain how their energy regulations affect power generation before those rules become final. **Who It Affects:** This bill affects electricity providers, power generators, federal regulators, and ultimately consumers who depend on reliable electricity. It could impact environmental and energy regulations from multiple federal agencies by adding a reliability review step before finalization. **Current Status:** The bill passed the House of Representatives. It now moves to the Senate for consideration. The legislation addresses concerns about maintaining grid stability as the nation's energy sources continue to evolve, though supporters and critics differ on whether these oversight measures will help or hinder the transition to clean energy sources.
CLEAR Act of 2025
# CLEAR Act of 2025 Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a substantive summary of this bill. The information available shows that HR 6352 (the CLEAR Act of 2025) is currently in committee, but the specific details about what the bill would actually do—its provisions, who it affects, and its purpose—are not included in the data you've provided. To give you an accurate, non-partisan summary, I would need access to the bill's text, which typically includes sections explaining its objectives and specific measures. Without these details, I can only tell you that it's a Republican-sponsored bill that hasn't yet moved out of committee. **I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 6352" to read the full bill text - Checking the bill summary section, which congressional staff prepare in plain language - Looking at the sponsor's official website for their explanation of the bill's purpose This will give you the most accurate and complete picture of what the legislation aims to do.
Supplemental Benefits for Individuals Act of 2025
# Supplemental Benefits for Individuals Act of 2025 (HR 5839) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** Unfortunately, the available information about this bill is very limited. The bill is titled the "Supplemental Benefits for Individuals Act of 2025" and was introduced by Representative Troy Balderson (R-OH), but the specific details about what programs it would affect, which benefits it targets, or what changes it proposes are not provided in the source material. "Supplemental benefits" could refer to various government assistance programs, but without the bill's text or summary, we cannot identify the exact provisions. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It remains in an early stage of the legislative process. **What We'd Need to Know:** To provide a complete summary for a general audience, the actual bill text or a detailed summary would be necessary to explain which Americans are affected, what specific changes would be made to benefit programs, and the anticipated impact.
Affordable, Reliable, Clean Energy Security Act of 2025
# Affordable, Reliable, Clean Energy Security Act of 2025 (HR 5765) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill aims to balance energy affordability, reliability, and environmental goals, though specific provisions are not yet publicly detailed in available summaries. The bill title suggests it would address how the U.S. produces and secures energy while managing costs and emissions. The bill is currently in the committee review stage, meaning Congress is still examining it before any vote takes place. **Who It Affects:** If passed, this legislation would impact energy consumers (through electricity and fuel costs), energy companies, power grid operators, and potentially workers in energy industries. Environmental groups and businesses relying on clean energy infrastructure would also be stakeholders. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5765 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full congressional vote. No companion bill in the Senate has been identified in the available information. Without access to the bill's full text or detailed committee analysis, specific provisions cannot be confirmed. Interested parties can track its progress through Congress.gov.
GRID Power Act
# GRID Power Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The GRID Power Act requires the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to streamline the process for connecting new power plants to the electrical grid, with a focus on "dispatchable" power sources—generators that can reliably produce electricity on demand when needed. The bill aims to make it faster and cheaper for these types of power projects to get connected while ensuring grid stability and reliability. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects power companies and energy developers who want to build new power plants, as well as electricity consumers who depend on a reliable grid. It could also impact existing interconnection procedures that other types of energy projects (like renewable energy) use when connecting to the grid. **Key Provisions & Current Status** The bill requires FERC to revise its current interconnection procedures and agreements to prioritize projects that improve grid reliability. The House passed the bill, meaning it now moves to the Senate for consideration. The focus on "dispatchable" power—which typically refers to traditional sources like natural gas or coal plants that can generate power consistently—reflects the bill's approach to grid management.
CABLE Leadership Act
# CABLE Leadership Act Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the detailed text or provisions of HR 5170 (CABLE Leadership Act) from the 119th Congress, so I cannot provide you with specific information about what this bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get accurate information about this bill, I recommend: - **Congress.gov** – Search for "HR 5170" to view the full text, bill summary, and status updates - **Representative Balderson's official website** – Often includes bill descriptions and sponsor statements - **Your representative's office** – Staff can explain how a bill might affect your district If you can share the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language for you.
Protecting American Energy from State Overreach Codification Act
# Protecting American Energy from State Overreach Codification Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill (HR 4629) would establish federal limits on state authority over energy production and related activities. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the title suggests it aims to prevent states from imposing their own regulations on energy development that the bill's sponsors view as excessive or overreaching. This would primarily affect energy companies operating across multiple states and potentially limit individual states' ability to set their own energy policies. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact energy producers (oil, gas, coal, and potentially renewable energy companies), states that have implemented strict environmental or energy regulations, and potentially consumers in states with different energy policies. Environmental advocates may view it as limiting state protections, while energy industry supporters may see it as reducing regulatory burden. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 4629 remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Troy Balderson (R-OH) in the 119th Congress. For detailed provisions and the bill's progress, you would need to consult Congress.gov or other legislative tracking resources.
ADAPT Act
# ADAPT Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The ADAPT Act would expand Medicare coverage to include mental health services provided by advanced psychology trainees—graduate students and residents in psychology training programs. Currently, Medicare doesn't routinely cover services from these trainees. The bill would also require federal health officials to create guidance helping states decide whether to cover these services under Medicaid and CHIP (the children's health insurance program). **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily benefit patients seeking mental health care, potentially increasing access to therapy and psychological services at lower costs. It would also affect psychology training programs and trainees themselves, as it could create new employment opportunities and funding sources for graduate-level psychology students. States would need to evaluate their own coverage policies based on federal guidance. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Rep. Troy Balderson, a Republican from Ohio.
Religious Exemptions for Social Security and Healthcare Taxes Act
# Religious Exemptions for Social Security and Healthcare Taxes Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 4389 would allow certain individuals with sincere religious beliefs to obtain exemptions from paying Social Security and Medicare (healthcare) taxes. Currently, federal law permits some religious groups—primarily Amish and Mennonite communities—to opt out of these programs if they meet specific criteria. This bill would likely expand or modify those existing exemption rules, though the specific details are not yet publicly available since it remains in committee. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect members of religious groups whose beliefs conflict with participating in government social insurance programs. It could also impact the Social Security and Medicare systems themselves, since fewer contributions from exempted individuals means less funding for these programs, though the overall effect would likely be minimal given the small number of people currently using such exemptions. **Current Status** As of now, HR 4389 is in committee and has not advanced to a full House vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Troy Balderson (R-OH) but has not yet been formally debated or amended by Congress. No timeline for further action has been announced.
Awning Safety Act of 2025
# Awning Safety Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does** The Awning Safety Act of 2025 directs the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to create new safety standards for awnings that can be retracted or moved. The law specifically aims to prevent deaths and serious injuries caused by awnings, particularly when they unexpectedly open and strike people who are removing tie-downs from awning covers. If passed, manufacturers would need to follow these new safety standards when making awnings. **Who It Affects** This bill would impact awning manufacturers and sellers, who would need to comply with the new CPSC standards. It would also affect consumers who use retractable or freestanding awnings, as the standards are intended to make these products safer. Construction companies and contractors who install awnings could also be affected depending on how the standards are implemented. **Current Status** The bill has already passed the House of Representatives and was introduced by Rep. Troy Balderson (R-OH). The next step would be consideration in the Senate before it could become law.
Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety and Oversight Improvements Act of 2025
# Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety and Oversight Improvements Act of 2025 **What the Bill Does** This bill tightens safety rules for compressed gas cylinders (like propane tanks) imported from foreign manufacturers. It requires foreign companies that want to sell these cylinders in the U.S. to provide more detailed information when applying for approval from the Department of Transportation, including whether they've faced any civil or criminal penalties in the past. The bill also allows the DOT to create a process where anyone—including safety advocates or competitors—can request that the government re-examine whether an approved foreign manufacturer is actually following safety standards. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects foreign manufacturers of compressed gas cylinders and the companies that import them into the United States. It also impacts consumers and businesses that use these cylinders, since stronger oversight could improve safety. The regulations apply to cylinders used for transporting hazardous materials like compressed gases in industries such as oil and gas, manufacturing, and healthcare. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is now awaiting action in the Senate.
AADAPT Act
# AADAPT Act Summary I don't have access to the detailed content of HR 3747 (the AADAPT Act) in my current information, so I can't provide you with a complete, accurate summary of what it specifically does, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 3747" to see the full text, summary, and amendments - **House Clerk's office** - For official legislative tracking - **Sponsor's website** - Rep. Troy Balderson's official page may have a description of his bill If you can share the bill's text or summary with me, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language for a general audience.
Expanding Remote Monitoring Access Act
# Expanding Remote Monitoring Access Act (HR 3032) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, introduced by Representative Troy Balderson (R-OH), would expand access to remote monitoring technology, though the specific details of how and where this monitoring would be applied are not specified in the available information. Generally, "remote monitoring" refers to the ability to observe or track something from a distance, which could apply to various contexts such as criminal justice (monitoring offenders), healthcare (patient monitoring), infrastructure, or other applications. **Current Status** HR 3032 is currently in committee, meaning it has been referred to the relevant congressional committee for review and discussion but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. The bill is in the early stages of the legislative process. **What You Should Know** Without access to the bill's full text or detailed provisions, it's difficult to specify exactly who would be affected or what specific remote monitoring systems would be expanded. If you're interested in this bill's particulars—such as whether it relates to criminal monitoring, medical devices, or another application—you may want to consult the full bill text on Congress.gov or contact Representative Balderson's office for clarification.
To nullify certain interagency guidance related to climate-related financial risk management for large financial institutions.
# Summary of HR 2923 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 2923 would overturn federal guidance that requires large financial institutions (like banks and investment firms) to assess and manage risks related to climate change. Currently, banking regulators issue guidance encouraging these institutions to evaluate how climate-related events—such as extreme weather or shifts in energy markets—could affect their finances and investments. This bill would eliminate that guidance, meaning financial institutions would no longer be required to follow these climate risk assessment recommendations. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects large banks, investment companies, and other major financial institutions that are subject to federal banking regulations. It could also indirectly impact investors, borrowers, and customers of these institutions by potentially reducing the scrutiny applied to climate-related financial risks. The bill does not affect smaller community banks or individuals' personal finances. **Current Status** HR 2923 was introduced by Representative Troy Balderson (R-OH) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill reflects ongoing debate between those who view climate risk assessments as necessary financial protections and those who see them as regulatory overreach.
Transportation Freedom Act
# Transportation Freedom Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Transportation Freedom Act (HR 2814) would reduce taxes on automobile manufacturers and roll back recent environmental regulations on vehicles. Specifically, it would create a new tax deduction allowing car and truck makers to deduct twice the wages they pay workers in domestic production, with some limitations. The bill would also cancel EPA rules from 2024 that require cars and trucks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions starting in 2027, and would eliminate stricter pollution standards for heavy-duty vehicles like school buses and semi-trucks. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily benefits automobile manufacturers and component suppliers through tax breaks. It would affect consumers indirectly by potentially keeping vehicle prices lower and delaying stricter environmental standards. Environmental advocates argue it would harm public health and climate goals, while supporters contend it reduces regulatory burdens on domestic auto producers and protects American jobs in the industry. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. Sponsor Troy Balderson (R-OH) introduced it during the 119th Congress. Like most bills, it would need committee approval and floor votes in both the House and Senate to become law.
Remote Opioid Monitoring Act of 2025
# Remote Opioid Monitoring Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Remote Opioid Monitoring Act of 2025 would establish a system for remotely monitoring patients who are prescribed opioid medications. While specific details aren't available from the provided information, bills with this title typically aim to track opioid use through technology—such as digital monitoring devices or data systems—to help prevent misuse, overdose, and addiction among patients receiving these powerful painkillers. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact patients prescribed opioids (such as painkillers), healthcare providers who prescribe them, and potentially insurance companies and government health programs. It could also affect law enforcement and public health agencies involved in addressing opioid abuse. **Current Status:** As of the information provided, HR 2404 is in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Troy Balderson (R-OH), representing Ohio's 12th district. *Note: Specific provisions of this bill weren't detailed in the available information. For complete details about what the monitoring system would entail and how it would operate, you would need to review the full bill text.*
Spectrum Coordination Act
# Spectrum Coordination Act Summary **What It Does:** This bill would require two federal agencies—the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) and NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration)—to publicly document their coordination efforts whenever the FCC proposes to reassign radio frequency spectrum that could affect government agencies' use of that spectrum. Specifically, the NTIA would need to file a public report showing when the FCC notified them of the proposal, which federal agencies might be impacted, when those agencies were informed, and any concerns they raised about the change. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects federal government agencies that rely on radio frequency spectrum (like the military, NASA, and other departments), telecommunications companies that auction and use spectrum, and the general public—since spectrum decisions impact wireless services, emergency communications, and technology infrastructure. The bill's main purpose is transparency rather than changing spectrum policy itself. **Key Provision:** The core requirement is creating a public record of the coordination process between the two agencies, making it harder for spectrum reallocation decisions to happen without documented consideration of federal users' needs. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Withdrawal of Technical Amendment".
# Summary of HJRES 66 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would overturn a recent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) decision from January 2025. The EPA had decided to reinstate Ohio's Air Nuisance Rule (ANR) in the state's air quality plan, reversing a 2020 decision that had removed it. If passed, this bill would block that EPA action and keep the ANR out of Ohio's air quality plan. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects Ohio residents and businesses, as it concerns the state's air quality standards and regulations. Under the Clean Air Act, states must maintain air quality plans that meet federal standards, and the ANR relates to how Ohio manages air pollution and emissions. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Troy Balderson (R-OH) and is currently in committee. It uses a congressional procedure (called the Congressional Review Act) that allows Congress to disapprove of EPA regulations. The bill has not yet been voted on by the full House or Senate.
To nullify the final rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "New Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New, Modified, and Reconstructed Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; and Repeal of the Affordable Clean Energy Rule".
# Bill Summary: HR 1651 **What It Would Do** This bill would overturn a recent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that sets limits on greenhouse gas emissions from coal and natural gas power plants—both new facilities and existing ones. The rule, which was finalized by the EPA, aims to reduce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from the electricity generation sector. If passed, HR 1651 would eliminate these emission standards, effectively canceling the EPA's climate regulations for power plants. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily impacts electric utility companies that operate fossil fuel power plants, as they would no longer be required to meet the EPA's emission reduction standards. Environmental advocates and states that support climate action would oppose it, while fossil fuel industry representatives and those concerned about energy costs would likely support it. The legislation is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.