End Judge Shopping Act

# End Judge Shopping Act (HR 2795) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to prevent "judge shopping"—a practice where plaintiffs or defendants strategically file lawsuits in specific courtrooms to get a particular judge they believe will favor their case. The legislation would establish rules to distribute cases more randomly or systematically across judges in federal courts, rather than allowing parties to influence which judge hears their case. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect federal courts, lawyers, and litigants involved in civil lawsuits. By limiting judge selection tactics, it could impact how cases are assigned and potentially change outcomes for parties who have historically benefited from appearing before favorable judges.

The specific mechanisms for case assignment would be determined by the bill's detailed provisions. **Current Status** As of now, HR 2795 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ). Without additional information about the bill's specific provisions, further details about its likely impact or timeline for advancement are unavailable.